Evaluating a Nitric Oxide Generator, Nebivolol as a Disease Modifier in Patients With Diabetic Neuropathy.

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 2, Phase 3
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
AgeUp to 18
SponsorSt. John's Research Institute

About this trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to test in patients with diabetic neuropathy,

* Can Nevibolol at a dose of 2.5 mg- 10 mg compared with standard pain modulating treatment conserve the mean nerve action potential amplitude (sural and tibial nerves) at 24 weeks follow- up. * Can Nevibolol at a dose of 2.5 mg- 10 mg compared with a combination of Alpha Lipoic Acid (600 mg/day)+EPALRESTAT (150 mg/day) conserve the mean nerve action potential amplitude (sural and tibial nerves) at 24 weeks follow- up

* All potential participants will undergo screening- about 10 ml of blood will be drawn to perform the following assesments at screening- HbA1c, FBS,Vit B12, TSH, fT4. * Baseline assessments conducting a nerve conduction study, quality of life assesment using Eq-5D-5L and NRS pain score. * 20% of patients (24 patients) will undergo Sudoscan, Corneal confocal microscopy and a skin biopsy for assessing IENFD (Intra Epidermal Nerve Fibre Density). * 15th day, 1 month and 3rd month followup for evaluating patients status and medication adherance. * 6th month followup for evaluating patients status and medication adherance.

Researchers will compare Nebivolol against combination of Epalrestat+Alpha Lipoic Acid against standard pain modulating treatment to evaluate their diseaes modifying effect as reflected by nerve conduction study parameters.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients aged >= 18 years diagnosed with diabetes mellitus, of a duration of <= 5 years since their diagnosis

HbA1c < 9 at enrolment with stable glycemic control for the last three months

Neuropathy meeting the following 'Toronto criteria' (8) - (a) abnormal nerve conduction study* based on age-matched controls at the site and - (b) a symptom or sign of neuropathy defined as one of either a diabetic neuropathy symptom score of >= 1/4 Or neuropathy disability score of >= 3/10 (9).

Abnormal NCS defined as one or more abnormal Z score in two or more nerves, based on sural nerve amplitude (antidromic stimulation), tibial and peroneal NCV, tibial amplitude, increased F-wave minimum latency (F-min), and absent F-waves (only considered abnormal in tibial nerve)

Disqualifiers

Absolute contra-indications for nebivolol - sick-sinus syndrome, sinus bradycardia with a resting heart rate < 50/ minute, second or third degree AV-nodal blocks fascicular blocks, severe asthma or COPD and acute heart failure

Patients with a compelling indication for a non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (CCB)

Patients with compelling need for another beta-blocker in the judgement of the treating team

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Nebivolol+ Standard care arm

    Drug

    This arm will receive tablet Nebivolol 2.5 mg OD uptitrated at 2 weeks to 5 mg and at 4 weeks if well tolerated to 10 mg/day which the participant will continue upto week 24

  • Epalrestat + Alpha Lipoic Acid +Standard care

    Drug

    This arm will receive tablet Epalrestat -150mg OD+ cap Alpha Lipoic Acid 600mg OD for 24 weeks.

  • Standard care alone

    Drug

    Patients in this arm will receive standard care as judged by their treating physicians which is generally pain modifying treatment.

Treatment groups

120 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: Nebivolol+ Standard care armExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Epalrestat + Alpha Lipoic Acid +Standard careActive comparator 1 intervention
Group C: Standard care aloneActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

The mean nerve action potential amplitude (sural and tibial nerves) between Arm 1 and Arm 3 at 24 weeks follow-up.

As part of nerve conduction study, the mean nerve action potential amplitude (sural and tibial nerves) will be compared between Arm 1 and Arm 3 at 24 weeks follow-up.

Time frame
Baseline and 24 weeks

Secondary outcomes

1

The proportion of patients who progress to develop severe neuropathy

To compare - 1. The proportion of patients who progress to severe neuropathy at week 24 follow-up. 2. The proportion of patients having a pain numerical rating scale(NRS) score \& between Nebivolol, lipoic acid+epalrestat and standard care arms at weeks 4 and 12. 3. Quantifying the intra-epidermal nerve fibre density (IENFD), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels and GAP-43 (neuromodulin) in a randomly selected sample (stratified by sex and baseline disease severity) of 20% patients each from the 3 arms pre and post-intervention and corneal nerve fibre length and density in all patients in the 3 arms at week 24.

Time frame
Baseline and 24 weeks

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.