Evaluating In Home Cancer Therapy Versus In Clinic Cancer Therapy in Black Men With Locally Advanced, Biochemically Recurrent and Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 2
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexMale
Age18+
SponsorMayo Clinic

About this trial

This phase II trial evaluates the impact of cancer therapy in the patients' home compared to in the clinic on safety, side effects, patient preference, and satisfaction in Black men with prostate cancer that has spread to nearby tissue or lymph nodes (locally advanced), that has increasing prostate-specific antigen after treatment (biochemically recurrent) or that has spread from where it first started (primary site) to other places in the body (metastatic). Typically drug-related cancer care is conducted at a medical center which causes patients to have to spend considerable time away from family, friends, and familiar surroundings. This separation may add to the physical, emotional, social, and financial burden for patients and their families during this difficult time in their lives. Therapy administered to a patient in the patients' residence in the comfort of familiar surrounding using Cancer Connected Access and Remote Expertise (CARE) Beyond Walls (CCBW) may help reduce psychological and financial distress, increase access to care and improve treatment compliance. Giving cancer therapy in the home compared in the clinic may be safe, tolerable and improve patient satisfaction with overall cancer care in Black men with locally advanced, biochemically recurrent or metastatic prostate cancer.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age ≥ 18 years

Participant must be receiving a standard-of-care treatment regimen listed in this protocol that is being used in accordance with standard medical practice. Specifically, it must be either a) FDA-approved for the participant's disease indication, or b) recommended in nationally recognized professional guidelines (e.g., NCCN, ASCO, ASH, etc.) as standard of care for the disease indication. Off-label use is permitted only if supported by such guidelines

Black or African American male patients with locally advanced, high risk, biochemical recurrent, or metastatic prostate cancer who are currently receiving or planning to start treatment with one or more of the eligible regimens. Patients may be on any combination of these regimens, provided that at least one is administered by a home health nurse [co-administration with second generation antiandrogens, poly adenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, oral gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRh) antagonists, estrogens, or older antiandrogens are allowed but combinations of oral regimens only are not permitted]

Leuprolide intramuscular (IM) or subcutaneous (SQ), 4 or 12 weeks cycle length

Disqualifiers

Receiving any other investigational agent which would be considered as a treatment for the primary neoplasm

Current inpatient hospitalization (excluding admission to the Advanced Care at Home program)

Co-morbid systemic illnesses or other severe concurrent disease which, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the patient inappropriate for entry into this study or interfere significantly with the proper assessment of safety and toxicity of the prescribed regimens

Ongoing or active infection

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Cancer Therapeutic Procedure

    Drug

    Given standard of care cancer treatment in clinic

  • Cancer Therapeutic Procedure

    Drug

    Given standard of care cancer treatment in home

  • Health Care Delivery

    Other intervention

    Receive in home cancer treatment with CCBW

  • Questionnaire Administration

    Other intervention

    Ancillary studies

Treatment groups

38 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: Treatment (in clinic treatment, in home treatment)Experimental treatment 3 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Patient rating of overall cancer care experience - CAHPS

Patient rating of their overall cancer care experience after 12 weeks of at-home cancer treatment will be compared to the same rating after 6 or 12 weeks of in-clinic cancer treatment. Will be assessed using patient ratings from a single item from the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers (CAHPS). Participants will rate "your overall cancer care experience" on a 0 to 10 scale where 0 is the worst experience possible and 10 is the best experience possible.

Time frame
Up to 48 weeks
2

Patient preferences regarding the location of cancer treatment delivery

Will be assessed by a single item asking patients to rate their preferred location for cancer treatment delivery on a 1 to 7 scale: 1=strongly prefer in clinic, 2=moderately prefer in clinic, 3=slightly prefer in clinic, 4=no preference, 5=slightly prefer at home, 6=moderately prefer at home, 7=strongly prefer at home.

Time frame
Up to 48 weeks
3

Incidence of grade 3+ adverse events (AEs)

Incidence, type, and severity of AEs experienced during the study period will be reported. The maximum grade for each type of adverse event will be summarized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. For individual adverse events and overall, the frequency and proportion of grade 3+ adverse events and grade 3+ adverse events at least possibly related to cancer treatment delivery will be reported for the entire study treatment period and by location of cancer treatment delivery (i.e., in clinic versus at home).

Time frame
Up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment
4

Acute care visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations

The frequency and proportion of patients who experience an acute care visit, emergency room visit, or hospitalization will be reported for the entire study treatment period and by location of cancer treatment delivery (i.e., during in clinic cancer treatment versus at-home cancer treatment).

Time frame
Up to 48 weeks

Secondary outcomes

1

Patient-reported function and global health status/quality of life

Will be measured by the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Functioning 17 (QLQ-F17), scored following its published scoring algorithm. Higher scores indicate better quality of life

Time frame
Up to 48 weeks
2

Patient-reported symptoms as measured by Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)-CTCAE

PRO-CTCAE uses a 0-4 scoring system for most items, with 0 representing the absence of a symptom or no impact, and 4 representing the highest severity or impact. Some items, specifically those assessing presence, use a 0/1 (absent/present) scale. The frequency and proportion of patients with a maximum baseline-adjusted composite score ≥ 3 during the study treatment period and by location of cancer treatment delivery will be reported.

Time frame
Up to 48 weeks
3

Patient-reported symptoms as measured by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy General Population 5 (FACT GP5)

The FACT GP5 consists of a single question, "I am bothered by side effects of treatment," rated on a scale of 0-4 where 0=not at all and 4=very much.

Time frame
Up to 48 weeks.
4

Patient Satisfaction and Feedback Questionnaire

Patient satisfaction will be measured by the Patient Satisfaction and Feedback Questionnaire (specific to this study). The questionnaire consists of 30 questions evaluating different aspects of care, including level of care (excellent, very good, good, faire poor), preference for location of care (at home vs in clinic), comparison of care at home vs in clinic (strongly agree, disagree, neither agree nor disagree, agree, strongly agree), communication received from care team (0-10 where 0=worst communication possible and 10=best communication possible), transition to care at home and use of at-home equipment (very easy, easy, neither, difficult, very difficult). Patient responses will be summarized descriptively.

Time frame
Up to 48 weeks

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Mayo Clinic

Lead sponsor

Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs

Collaborator