Fluorescence-Guided Surgical Resection for Reducing Unexpected Positive Margins in Patients With Sarcoma, SarcoSIGHT Trial

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 2
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
AgeNot listed
SponsorCity of Hope Medical Center

About this trial

This phase II trial compares standard of care surgical resection to fluorescence-guided surgical resection using indocyanine green and fluorescence imaging for reducing unexpected positive margin rates in patients with sarcoma. Surgical margins are one of the criteria used in assessing the effectiveness of a given surgical procedure. They are the edges or border of the tissue removed in cancer surgery. A negative margin means that the resected tumor is surrounded by normal tissue, which implies there is no disease left in the patient. By contrast, a positive margin means that sarcoma cells are visible at the edge of the tumor. Positive margins may be classified as planned when they are expected pre-operatively due to the preservation of a critical structure, or unexpected when the pathologist reports the presence of tumor at the margin despite the surgeon having intended to remove it in its entirety. Fluorescence-guided surgery is an established surgical method that involves the administration of fluorescent dye (in this case, indocyanine green) into the tumor, which can then be visualized with a special camera during surgery to help surgeons identify tumor versus healthy tissue. Fluorescence-guided surgery may reduce the rate of unexpected positive margins in patients undergoing surgery for sarcoma.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Documented written informed consent of the participant

Histologically confirmed diagnosis of intermediate to high grade sarcoma

All ages

Amenable to surgical resection as a part of curative intent for the patient

Disqualifiers

Due for surgery with palliative intent

Recurrent tumors

Intracranial, retroperitoneal, and visceral anatomical locations

A woman of childbearing potential who is currently pregnant (as confirmed by urine pregnancy test)

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Electronic Health Record Review

    Other intervention

    Ancillary studies

  • Fluorescence Imaging

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo fluorescence imaging

  • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo FGS

  • Indocyanine Green

    Drug

    Given IV

  • Questionnaire Administration

    Other intervention

    Ancillary studies

  • Resection

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo surgical resection

Treatment groups

22 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Arm I (standard of care)Active comparator 3 interventions
Group B: Arm II (FGS)Experimental treatment 5 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Unexpected positive margin (UPM) rate

The margin status of each tumor will be taken from the pathology report for each patient enrolled in the trial. This will be recorded at six months post- surgery and will be classified according to the R classification system. The UPM rate for each arm will be defined by calculating the percentage of patients in that arm with a UPM on histopathological assessment of the resection specimen. The percentage of patients with unexpected positive margins will be calculated for each group to give the unexpected positive margin rate. This will then be compared between the two groups. Will use a logistic regression that adjusts key covariates including stratification factors used in the randomization. A Wald test and a 95% confidence interval will be extracted from this model. A two-sided p-value will be found from the Wald test.

Time frame
At 6 months post-surgery

Secondary outcomes

1

Intraoperative complications

Intraoperative complications may include blood loss requiring transfusion, inadvertent damage to nerves, inadvertent damage to tendons/ligaments, inadvertent damage to bony structures, myocardial infarction, stroke, other events determined by the principal investigator to be a complication of the surgery. Will be compared between the two groups at the day of operation. Descriptive analysis will be performed to analyze the nature of the data. Secondary outcomes with binary/multiple measures will be analyzed with logistic regression. For variables with continuous measure, appropriate regression models will be used. Appropriate statistical tests depending on the nature of the variables (whether qualitative or quantitative) will be used for comparison between the two treatment arms.

Time frame
During surgical resection
2

Postoperative complications

Postoperative complications may include wound infection, wound dehiscence, seroma, flap complications, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, stroke, other events determined by the principal investigator to be a complication of the surgery. Post operative complications will be graded using the Calvien Dindo Classifications of Surgical Complications. Will be compared between the two groups at the day of operation and at 1-, 6- and 12-month follow-up time points. Descriptive analysis will be performed to analyze the nature of the data. Secondary outcomes with binary/multiple measures will be analyzed with logistic regression. For variables with continuous measure, appropriate regression models will be used. Appropriate statistical tests depending on the nature of the variables (whether qualitative or quantitative) will be used for comparison between the two treatment arms.

Time frame
Up to 12 months
3

Length of index operation

Will be measured in minutes. Will be compared between groups on the day of operation. Descriptive analysis will be performed to analyze the nature of the data. Secondary outcomes with binary/multiple measures will be analyzed with logistic regression. For variables with continuous measure, appropriate regression models will be used. Appropriate statistical tests depending on the nature of the variables (whether qualitative or quantitative) will be used for comparison between the two treatment arms.

Time frame
During surgical resection
4

Length of inpatient stay

Will be measured in days. Will be compared between the two groups at the day of operation and at 1-, 6- and 12-month follow-up time points. Descriptive analysis will be performed to analyze the nature of the data. Secondary outcomes with binary/multiple measures will be analyzed with logistic regression. For variables with continuous measure, appropriate regression models will be used. Appropriate statistical tests depending on the nature of the variables (whether qualitative or quantitative) will be used for comparison between the two treatment arms.

Time frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

City of Hope Medical Center

Lead sponsor

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Collaborator