Immunogenicity and Safety of Two Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccine Strategies in Lung and Allogeneic Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: A Phase 2 Trial

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phasePhase 2
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorHospices Civils de Lyon

About this trial

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a major cause of acute respiratory infections (ARIs), which occur in seasonal outbreaks. Among the adult population, immunocompromised individuals, particularly lung transplant recipients and recipients of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCTs), are at the highest risk of severe ARI. RSV can also cause prolonged inflammation of the airways, leading to persistent deterioration in lung function. Thus, in lung transplant recipients, RSV is a major cause of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), the leading cause of lung transplant failure and mortality beyond the first post-transplant year. In recipients of ACSH, RSV infection is associated with the onset and/or worsening of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, which leads to increased mortality. Preventing RSV-associated lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD) and its short- and long-term consequences in these populations is therefore a key priority.

Three inactivated RSV vaccines, targeting the RSV fusion glycoprotein in its pre-fusion conformation (RSVpreF), have recently been approved for use in adults. These comprise two recombinant protein vaccines - one with an adjuvant (RSVpreF3-AS01, Arexvy®, GSK) and one without (RSVpreF, Abrysvo®, Pfizer) - and one mRNA vaccine. Although these vaccines have demonstrated their safety, immunogenicity and efficacy (reducing the risk of RSV-related IMRI by approximately 80-85 per cent) in adults aged 60 and over, the pivotal trials excluded immunocompromised patients.

To date, there is limited data on the efficacy, immunogenicity and tolerability of these vaccines in high-risk immunocompromised populations, such as recipients of bone marrow transplants and allogeneic stem cell transplants. Real-world studies suggest that RSV vaccines may reduce the risk of RSV-associated acute respiratory infection and hospitalisations in elderly immunocompromised adults. With regard to immunogenicity, the available cohort studies, conducted on small sample sizes, indicate that the vaccine response is heterogeneous and, overall, lower than that observed in immunocompetent older people. Preliminary data suggest that booster vaccination regimens may be necessary to optimise the immune response in these populations.

Given the significant morbidity associated with RSV in recipients of bone marrow transplants and allogeneic stem cell transplants, it is a priority to assess the immunogenicity and safety profile of RSV vaccines, and to determine the optimal vaccination schedule for these high-risk, immunocompromised populations.

The investigators hypothesise that the immune response to RSV vaccines in severely immunocompromised TP and ACSH recipients is weaker than in immunocompetent older adults, and that enhanced vaccination strategies may be required. In this study, two vaccination strategies will be evaluated in these populations:

* a single dose of the adjuvanted RSVpreF3-AS01 vaccine (Arexvy®), * or a booster regimen comprising two doses of the non-adjuvanted RSVpreF vaccine (Abrysvo®), administered one month apart.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Prior lung transplantation (including combined transplants) performed ≥3 months before the first vaccine administration (LTR) OR prior allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation performed within ≥3 months to 5 years before the first vaccine administration (HSCTR);

Active follow-up at one of the study centres;

Age ≥18 years at inclusion;

Providing written, informed consent.

Disqualifiers

Previous vaccination with any licensed or investigational RSV vaccine;

History of any reaction or hypersensitivity likely to be exacerbated by any component of the vaccines;

Active malignant disease at inclusion (with the exclusion of non-melanoma skin cancer);

Receipt of immunoglobulins and/or any plasma derivatives during the period starting 90 days before the first study vaccine administration, or planned administration during the study period;

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • RSVpreF3-AS01

    Biological/Vaccine

    Administration of a single 0.5 mL dose on day 0 (D0) by intramuscular injection

  • RSVpreF3

    Biological/Vaccine

    Administration of a 0.5 mL dose on day 0 (D0) and a 0.5 mL dose on day 30 by intramuscular injection

Treatment groups

400 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Recipients of lung transplants (LTR)Experimental treatment 2 interventions
Group B: Recipients of haematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCTR)Experimental treatment 2 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

RSVpreF-binding antibody response to each of the two RSV vaccine strategies in two distinct subcohorts (LTR and HSCTR)

Proportion of participants in each group who achieve a seroresponse one month after completion of vaccination (visit 2). A seroresponse is defined as either (1) seroconversion, i.e., an RSVpreF-binding serum IgG concentration ≥4 times the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) when baseline is \<LLOQ, or (2) a ≥4-fold rise in RSVpreF-binding serum IgG concentration from baseline

Time frame
One month after completing vaccination (Visit 2 - Day 30 for patients with RSVpreF3-AS01 or Day 60 for patients with RSVApreF3)

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: