About this trial
This is a two-part study, comprised of an initial open-label run-in phase (Part 1) in a subset of 3 subjects to provide first data regarding safety, and feasibility of the percutaneous endovascular catheter-facilitated intramyocardial delivery of XC001 in patients with RA due to obstructive CAD.
Part 1 of the study is comprised of 3 subjects with RA (CCS class II-IV) who will receive 4×1011 viral particles (vp) XC001. An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC), the committee will review safety and feasibility data and approval to commence enrollment in Part 2 of the study.
Part 2 is a randomized, double-blind, sham-procedure control study. Subjects with RA (CCS class II-IV) with no therapeutic options will be randomized 1:1 to either the treatment group with catheter delivery of 4×1011 vp XC001 (approximately N=53) or a sham procedure group (approximately N=53). It is estimated that approximately 106 subjects will be randomized to result in 100 evaluable subjects. All subjects enrolled in Part 1, as well as Part 2 will follow all screening and safety monitoring procedures for up to 12 months (Table 2), and will be included in the safety analysis of the study.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Males and females, age 18 to 85 years, inclusive, at the time of signing the ICF.
Diagnosis of chronic angina due to obstructive CAD that is refractory to drug therapy and unsuitable for revascularization via coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (as defined by ESC Joint Study Group on the Treatment of Refractory Angina Refractory, Mannheimer et al, EHJ 2002 and the 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease, Montalescot et al, EHJ 2013; and Jolicoeur et al 2008).
Angina class II-IV as measured by CCS Functional Classification of Angina Pectoris.
History of evidence of reversible left ventricular ischemia, as assessed by stress ECG (including screening), stress echocardiography, single- photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), CT angiography imaging with fractional flow reserve analysis, stress PET (including screening) or cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging that has not resolved with intervention or by an acute coronary event.
Disqualifiers
ST-Elevation or non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI or NSTEMI) not requiring revascularization, transmural MI, or cerebral vascular accident within the past 60 days prior to the screening visit.
Uncontrolled hypercholesterolemia defined as low-density lipoprotein (LDL) above 190 mg/dL.
Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure [BP] >180 mmHg, diastolic BP >100 mmHg) despite maximal medical treatment.
Current untreated malignant ventricular arrhythmias (with episode of sustained or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) in last 30 days; suspected/probable/definite).
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
XC001
Combination productXC001 administered by percutaneous catheter delivery using the Extroducer® Infusion Catheter System.
Sham (No Treatment)
Combination productSubjects randomized to the sham catheterization procedure group will receive the same procedure as the treatment group (with introduction of an iliofemoral or radial sheath, positioning of the pigtail catheter in the left ventricle, generation of ventriculograms, and mimicking of the injection procedure by the interventional team following a Cath Lab script), except they will not have the delivery catheter inserted and will not receive any endocardial injections
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Composite endpoint
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of XC001 on a composite endpoint of a) TED from a graded treadmill test (ETT), as assessed by a core lab, b) angina frequency from a diary (extracting the 2 weeks prior to the Week 12 and Week 26 visit) and c) ischemic burden, as quantified by stress imaging by PET (as assessed by a core lab) at 12 and 26 weeks following a one-time endocardial administration to CAD patients with RA compared to the sham procedure.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.