Low Amplitude Pulse Seizure Therapy Versus Standard Ultra-Brief Right Unilateral Electroconvulsive Therapy

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 2, Phase 3
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-90
SponsorMichigan State University

About this trial

This protocol proposes an initial randomized clinical trial that includes all patients with suicidal ideation (SI) at baseline, and with SI as the primary outcome measure to examine whether Right Unilateral Low-Amplitude Pulse - Seizure Therapy (RUL LAP-ST) treatment has more magnitude and rate of remission of SI as conventional pulse amplitude Right Unilateral Electroconvulsive Therapy (RUL ECT) (based on our prior secondary analysis). Our central hypothesis is that RUL LAP-ST has significantly less cognitive/memory side effects (no memory side effects were noted in our prior studies for 500mA and 600mA) and thus is more favorable in terms of side effects compared to RUL conventional pulse amplitude ECT, while maintaining better anti-suicidal effect.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients in whom ECT is clinically indicated: The referrals to ECT by the primary psychiatrist (before a consult by the ECT consultant) will serve to both increase the feasibility of the study and address any ethical concerns that the patient would not undergo ECT without having a valid full indication for the procedure as well as increase the external validity and generalizability of the study.

Male or female patients 18 to 90 years of age

Current DSM-5 criteria for MDE with any SI of major depressive, bipolar, or schizoaffective disorders

Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale (MADRS) with 2 or more on SI item

Disqualifiers

Unstable or serious medical condition that substantially increases risks of ECT or cognitive impairment

Female patients who are pregnant or plan to be pregnant during the study or are breast-feeding

History of neurological disorder if deemed by the treating ECT physician or PI to pose a significant risk with ECT, or if there is any metal in the head or history of known structural brain lesion or skull defect that is deemed to affect cognition or safe ECT treatment

Implanted devices that make ECT unsafe

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Sigma-Stim

    Device

    Right Ultra-Brief Low Amplitude Seizure Therapy at 600mA or 700mA vs Right Unilateral Ultra-Brief Standard ECT at 800mA.

  • RUL LAP-ST (Low-Amplitude Pulse Seizure Therapy - Right Unilateral)

    Procedure/Surgery

    Please see description above

Treatment groups

30 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: RUL LAP-ST (Low-Amplitude Pulse Seizure Therapy - Right Unilateral)Experimental treatment 2 interventions
Group B: RUL ECT (Electroconvulsive Therapy)Active comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Suicide Ideation - Self Report

Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (SSI-Worst and SSI-Current) - self reported. Minimum score of 0, maximum score of 42. Lower score indicates a better outcome.

Time frame
Through study completion, an average of four weeks
2

Suicide Ideation - Clinician Rated

Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) - clinician administered. Intensity of suicidal ideation: minimum score of 0, maximum score of 5. Lower score indicates a better outcome. Suicidal behavior not rated on a scale.

Time frame
Through study completion, an average of four weeks

Secondary outcomes

1

Depression - Clinician Rated

Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) - clinician administered. Minimum score of 0, maximum score of 60. Lower score indicates better outcome.

Time frame
Through study completion, an average of four weeks
2

Depression - Self Report

Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9) - self reported. Minimum score of 0, maximum score of 27. Lower score indicates better outcome.

Time frame
Through study completion, an average of four weeks
3

Depression - Self Report

Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR) - self reported. Minimum score of 0, maximum score of 27. Lower score indicates better outcome.

Time frame
Through study completion, an average of four weeks

Other outcomes

1

Anxiety

Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD7) - self reported. Minimum score 0, maximum score 21. Lower score indicates better outcome.

Time frame
Through study completion, an average of four weeks
2

Psychosis

Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) - clinician administered. Full scale minimum score of 31. Maximum score of 217. Lower score indicates better outcome.

Time frame
Through study completion, an average of four weeks
3

Global Clinical Assessment

Clinical Global Improvement (CGI) - clinician administered. Severity: minimum score of 0, maximum score of 7, lower score indicates better outcome. Improvement: minimum score of 0, maximum score of 7, lower score indicates better outcome.

Time frame
Through study completion, an average of four weeks
4

Time to Reorientation after ECT sessions

Time to Reorientation scale (TRO) - study staff administered. Minimum score 3 minutes, maximum score more than 20 minutes. Lower score indicates better outcome.

Time frame
Through study completion, an average of four weeks

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Michigan State University

Lead sponsor

Pine Rest Christian Mental Health Services

Collaborator