Methotrexate Treatment in Hand Osteoarthritis Refractory to Usual Treatments

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 2, Phase 3
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age40-85
SponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice

About this trial

Randomized study comparing the structural efficacy of methotrexate versus placebo in digital osteoarthritis

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

None

Disqualifiers

Having a bilirubin level > 5 mg/dl (85.5 µmol/l)

Pregnant or breastfeeding women (a urine pregnancy test will be performed on women of childbearing age),

Injection of hyaluronic acid within the previous 6 months,

Injection of cortisone derivatives within the previous 3 months,

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Methotrexate Injectable Solution

    Drug

    Injection of methotrexate every week during 12 month

  • Placebo

    Drug

    The placebo consists of a 0.9% solution of sodium chloride (NaCl) in sterile distilled water for injection. This solution was chosen as the placebo. Injection every week during 12 month.

Treatment groups

170 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Methotrexate injectableActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: PlaceboPlacebo comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Structural lesion

The progression of structural damage between M0 and M12, the worsening of digital osteoarthritis in a joint, will be defined by the change in stage of the Verbruggen-Veys score. The Verbruggen-Veys anatomical scoring system for hand osteoarthritis, which evaluates the radiographic progression of interphalangeal joints. This scale classifies each joint into five stages (N, S, J, E, R) reflecting increasing severity of structural damage. Progression is defined as a transition to a more advanced stage between M0 and M12. As this is a categorical ordinal scale rather than a continuous numerical score, there are no minimum or maximum numerical values. However, higher stages correspond to more severe structural damage and thus a worse outcome.

Time frame
12 months

Secondary outcomes

1

Function

Hand function will be assessed using the Australian/Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index (AUSCAN). The AUSCAN is a validated patient-reported outcome measure that evaluates pain, stiffness, and physical function in hand osteoarthritis. The function subscale consists of 9 items, each scored on a Likert scale. The total function score ranges from 0 to 36, with higher scores indicating worse functional impairment. Changes in the AUSCAN function score between baseline (M0) and 12 months (M12) will be analyzed.

Time frame
12 months
2

Effectiveness of the treatment on pain

The effectiveness of the treatment on pain will be assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, a validated patient-reported outcome measure. The VAS consists of a 100 mm horizontal line, where 0 mm indicates "no pain" and 100 mm indicates "worst imaginable pain". The outcome will be expressed as the mean pain score (in millimeters) and the change in pain score from baseline (M0) at each time point (M3, M9, and M12). Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity and therefore a worse outcome.

Time frame
12 months

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.