About this trial
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening condition with a diffuse, inflammatory form of lung injury, causing pulmonary infiltration and respiratory failure leading to poor oxygenation. It is a rapidly progressive form of respiratory failure and accounts for approximately 10% of admissions to the intensive care unit (ICU) and has a high mortality (40%) in severe cases. Globally, approximately 3 million ARDS cases are reported each year, with around 200,000 cases seen in the United States.
The etiology of ARDS could be pulmonary or extra-pulmonary. Patients with ARDS have symptoms like difficulty in breathing, shortness of breath, and cyanosis, and they may require assisted breathing/ventilatory support/extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. About 25% of ARDS patients need mechanical ventilation to support breathing; however, a ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) is known to further exacerbate ARDS in many of them. In recent decades, numerous efforts have been made to develop therapies for treating/managing ARDS. Unfortunately, they have been largely unsuccessful or inconclusive, and at present, no effective pharmacological therapy for ARDS is available. Hence, development of better therapeutics for ARDS is an unmet need.
Centhaquine is a first-in-class resuscitative agent for hypovolemic shock approved for marketing in India. Centhaquine has been found to be an effective resuscitative agent in rat, rabbit, and swine models of hemorrhagic shock. Its safety and tolerability have been demonstrated in a human phase I study in 25 subjects (CTRI/2014/06/004647). Results from multicentric, randomized, double-blind, parallel, controlled clinical phase II (CTRI/2017/03/008184) and phase III (CTRI/2019/01/017196) studies conducted in India indicate that centhaquine is a novel, first-in-class, highly effective resuscitative agent for hypovolemic shock. A total of 155 patients with hypovolemic shock have been studied in the combined phase II and III trials, while a multicentric phase IV study (NCT05956418) in 400 patients with hypovolemic shock is currently being conducted in India. The outcomes of the completed trials indicate that centhaquine is safe and reduces mortality significantly (P=0.0271) compared to standard treatment of hypovolemic shock. In the phase II and III studies, ARDS and MODS were evaluated as secondary endpoints. Centhaquine provided hemodynamic stability and significantly reduced ARDS and multiple organ dysfunction score (MODS) in patients enrolled in these trials, which suggests that centhaquine has potential beyond treating hypovolemic shock and could be useful for ARDS treatment. Centhaquine is likely to provide hemodynamic stability, improve tissue oxygenation, reduce pulmonary edema, reduce ARDS score, and reduce MODS in patients with ARDS.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Adult male or female aged 18 years or older
Hospitalized in the ICU diagnosed with moderate to severe ARDS having a PaO2/FiO2 ratio of < 200 mmHg or the SPO2/FiO2 ratio of ≤ 235( if SPO2 ≤ 97 %) with PEEP ≥ 5 cm H20 include the patient receiving invasive /non-invasive ventilation (NIV/CPAP).
The first dose of the study drug should be administered within 48 hours of confirming moderate to severe ARDS.
Requires vasopressor support
Disqualifiers
Receiving or expected to receive extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or high-frequency oscillatory ventilation
Confirmed pregnancy
Breast feeding
Participating in another interventional study
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Normal Saline
DrugPlacebo (Dose: equal volume saline) + Standard of care
Centhaquine
DrugCenthaquine (Dose: 0.01 mg/kg) + Standard of care
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Improvement of PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≥200 mmHg or relative increase by 50 mmHg from baseline
The study's primary objective is to determine the clinical effect of centhaquine in patients with moderate to severe ARDS.
Secondary outcomes
28-day all-cause mortality
Incidence of 28-day all-cause mortality
60-day all-cause mortality
Incidence of 60-day all-cause mortality
Time to clinical improvement on WHO 8-point ordinal scale
Time to clinical improvement on WHO 8-point ordinal scale (ranging from 1-Ambulatory to 8-Death)
Hospital free days
Hospital free days \[Time frame: The number of days beginning with the day of randomization counted as "Day 1" through Day 28\]
Locations
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: