About this trial
Building upon the results from the CCCG-ALL-2015, CCCG-ALL-2020 multicenter study cohort, concurrent research findings, and the latest clinical trials, the CCCG-ALL-2025 I/HR-B-ALL is thus developed to further improve the event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS), and quality of life (QoL) of children with intermediate- and high- risk B-cell childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (I/HR-B-ALL), while decreasing adverse reactions and transplantation rates. This trial primarily aims to explore:
1. The efficacy of two randomized Blinatumomab application scheme on I/HR-ALL as determined by MRD negatvitiy rate. 2. The efficacy of modified mini-hyperCVD + Venetoclax in I/HR-ALL cannot afford blinatumomab, in contrast to historical control as determined by MRD negatvitiy rate.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Age older than 1 month to younger than 18 years.
Diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia by bone marrow morphology.
Diagnosis of B-ALL by immunophenotyping.
Disqualifiers
Low-risk ALL
sIgM+
Acute leukemias of ambiguous lineage diagnosed according to WHO or EGIL criteria.
ALL evolved from chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Blinatumomab (Group A)
DrugFor Group A I/HR-ALL patients after induction remission phase, continuous 28 days' blinatumomab followed by 3 cycles of high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) will be applied, subsequently followed by interim continuation, late intensification, and maintenance therapy
Venetoclax (nonRand Group)
DrugFor I/HR patients non eligible for blinatumomab randomization, venetoclax+ mini-hyperCVD will be applied after PVDL induction, subsequently followed by CAT as intensification, interim continuation, late intensification, and maintenance therapy
Blinatumomab (Group B)
DrugFor Group B I/HR-ALL patients after induction remission phase: a two 14-day cycles of blinatumomab, alternating with three cycles of HDMTX will be applied, subsequently followed interim continuation, late intensification, and maintenance therapy
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
To investigate if Group B[2*(14-day blinatumomab + HDMTX*2)] can result in noninferior event-free survival (EFS) compared to Group A [28-day blinatumomab + HDMTX*4
* The randomization is stratified by hospitals and status of flow-cytometry MRD (positive or negative) immediately prior to the blinatumomab-HDMTX treatment. * Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates of each EFS function will be computed along with standard error by the default procedure in R. To test noninferiority the investigators consider a noninferiority margin of 0.04 for 5-year EFS as clinically meaningful. * Assume the EFS in the control group (Arm A) to be the same as the provisional I/HR in the CCCG-ALL2020 trial (preliminary data above), with the 1-year and 3-year EFS possibly 0.837 and 0.768 respectively. A simulation study with 10,000 rounds shows that by randomizing 1800 patients and 1.5 years of follow up, the above decision rule of declaring noninferiority has well controlled probabilities of false positive and false negative errors.
Secondary outcomes
Event-free survival (EFS) in the two randomized arms [2*(14-day blinatumomab + HDMTX*2)] and [28-day blinatumomab + HDMTX*4], in contrast to historical regimens.
EFS functions will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator of survival functions along with 95% confidence interval at 5 year. Standard error will be estimated using the default procedure in R. Follow up of the historical comparison cohort (CCCG-ALL-2020 and 2015) will continue during the course of the current trial. Comparisons of EFS will be performed using two-sided log-rank test. Multivariable regression modeling including trial (CCCGALL-2025 vs. 2020 or 2015) and other known prognostic factors as main effects may also be performed, using the Cox models.
Cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) in the two randomized arms [2*(14-day blinatumomab + HDMTX*2)] and [28-day blinatumomab + HDMTX*4], in contrast to historical regimen.
CIR functions of relapse will be estimated by the Kalbafleisch-Prentice method. Follow up of the historical comparison cohort (CCCG-ALL-2020 and 2015) will continue during the course of the current trial. Comparisons of CIR will be performed by Gray's test. Multivariable regression modeling including trial (CCCGALL-2025 vs. 2020 or 2015) and other known prognostic factors as main effects may also be performed, using the Fine-Gray models.
Overall survival (OS) in the two randomized arms [2*(14-day blinatumomab + HDMTX*2)] and [28-day blinatumomab + HDMTX*4], in contrast to historical regimens.
OS functions will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator of survival functions along with 95% confidence interval at 5 year. Standard error will be estimated using the default procedure in R. Follow up of the historical comparison cohort (CCCG-ALL-2020 and 2015) will continue during the course of the current trial. Comparisons of OS will be performed using two-sided log-rank test. Multivariable regression modeling including trial (CCCGALL-2025 vs. 2020 or 2015) and other known prognostic factors as main effects may also be performed, using the Cox models.
EFS in patients who receive 6 alternated venetoclax/Daunorubincin courses of interim continuation therapy.
EFS functions will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator of survival functions along with 95% confidence interval at 5 year. Standard error will be estimated using the default procedure in R. Follow up of the historical comparison cohort (CCCG-ALL-2020 and 2015) will continue during the course of the current trial. Comparisons of EFS will be performed using two-sided log-rank test.Multivariable regression modeling including trial (CCCGALL-2025 vs. 2020 or 2015) and other known prognostic factors as main effects may also be performed, using the Cox models.
Other outcomes
measurable residual diseases (MRD) positivity by next-generation sequencing of immunoglobulin gene(IgH NGS) after blinatumomab-HDMTX therapy between the two randomized arms [2*(14-day blinatumomab + HDMTX*2)] and [28-day blinatumomab + HDMTX*4].
Proportions of patients with positive IgH NGS MRD in each arm will be estimated by the sample proportion along with the 95% confidence interval. The NGS MRD positive proportions will be compared by the two-sample z test. If the NGS MRD positive proportions are very low in one or both arms, Fisher's exact test will be applied.
Cellular immune-status prior to Blinatumomab-HDMTX consolidation therapy
Descriptive statistics on T lymphocytes functions (exhaustion, activation, TCR diversity, etc.) including correlation coefficients (Pearson's or Spearman's) and regression modeling including possibly longitudinal data models will be applied as appropriate to analyze the biological associations.
Cellular immune functions after blinatumomab-HDMTX consolidation
Descriptive statistics on T lymphocytes functions (exhaustion, activation, TCR diversity, etc.).including correlation coefficients (Pearson's or Spearman's) and regression modeling including possibly longitudinal data models will be applied as appropriate to analyze the biological associations.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.