Pain Outcomes After Digital Amputation Using Tulavi Allay™ Nerve Cap

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 2
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age22+
SponsorMassachusetts General Hospital

About this trial

In 2016, one in five individuals in the United States (US) experienced chronic pain, and approximately 40% of them suffered from neuropathic pain. The physical and emotional burden on patients results in costs of billions of dollars annually. Digital amputations affect over 23,000 people each year in the US and may lead to neuropathic pain and neuroma formation in the transected nerves. Previous studies have reported a 6.6% incidence of symptomatic neuroma, and more than 60% of these patients require surgery to reduce the negative impact on their daily living activities.

To minimize neuroma formation after digital amputation, various techniques have been described, such as traction neurectomies (TN) and dorsal transpositions (DT), with and without nerve coaptation. However, it remains unclear whether these techniques improve patient-reported outcome measures in individuals undergoing this type of procedure. Previously published studies are descriptive in nature, focus on a single surgical technique, or include patients with established symptomatic neuromas. The only prospective trial on this topic was published in 2000 and compared two conventional techniques that have since been modified to better minimize neuroma formation or to reduce mechanical pressure by transposing the nerve ends to the dorsal aspect of the hand. However, that study used different scales to measure outcomes and did not incorporate aspects of pain that affect patients' emotional and social well-being.

Currently, two randomized controlled trials are enrolling patients. One compares surgical techniques for the treatment of neuroma rather than its prevention. The other excludes digits with injuries located distal to the interphalangeal joints. Both studies focus on more complex surgical techniques.

Given the extent of this problem, there has been recent innovation aimed at preventing neuroma formation. One promising product is the Tulavi Allay™ Nerve Cap, which has demonstrated encouraging results in basic science studies and anecdotally in early clinical use cases. In this study, the investigators have designed a prospective trial to assess the efficacy of the Tulavi Allay™ Nerve Cap when used to prevent symptomatic digital nerve neuroma following traumatic digital amputation.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients undergoing traumatic amputation of a single or multiple digits at MGB

English-speaking

Disqualifiers

Patients undergoing revision amputation or non-traumatic amputation

Patients under 22 years old

Patients who are pregnant and/or breastfeeding

Unable or unwilling to participate in a trial study

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Tulavi allay Nerve Cap

    Device

    The Tulavi allay Nerve Capfirst and only fully absorbable in situ forming technology designed to protect transected nerves, prevent axonal escape, and reduce the risk of neuroma formation. https://tulavi.com/allay-nerve-cap/

Treatment groups

20 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: Tulavi allay Nerve CapExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Visual Analog / Numerical Rating Scale (VAS/NRS) Scores)

• Numerical Rating Scale (NRS): is a standard pain scale measured on a 11 point (0-10) where 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain. There are no values defined as a clinically important difference for painful conditions in amputated digits, but previous studies on chronic painful conditions define a reduction of 2 points as a clinically important difference.

Time frame
12 months
2

• Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference (PROMIS PI)

• Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference (PROMIS PI): this scale incorporates other aspects of pain that influence patient´s emotional and social life. We will use the most recent version PROMIS Pain Interference computer-adaptive testing (PROMIS IP CAT) that measures pain interference over the past 7 days. PROMIS scores have a mean of 50 and a SD of 10 in the reference population (U.S general population with a painful condition).

Time frame
12 months
3

Cold Intolerance Symptom Severity score (CISS)

• Cold Intolerance Symptom Severity score (CISS) is a 6 questions scale with a possible total score from 4-100. Each question has a score of 0=no symptoms to 10=the most severe symptoms you can possibly imagine (the first question does not count for the final score). Previous studies suggested CISS\>50 as a clinical cut-off for pathological cold intolerance.

Time frame
12 months

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Massachusetts General Hospital

Lead sponsor

Tulavi Therapeutics,Inc.

Collaborator