Pediatric Low Grade Glioma - MEKinhibitor TRIal vs Chemotherapy

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 2
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age1-25
SponsorUniversity Hospital, Strasbourg, France

About this trial

Pediatric low-grade glioma (PLGG) is a heterogeneous group of WHO grade I and II brain tumors, associated with a 10-year overall survival of 90%. It is the most common form of primary central nervous system (CNS) tumor arising during childhood, adolescence and young adulthood, accounting for over 30% of CNS tumors in this age group. A large group of PLGG patients will benefit from a complete resection of their tumor. Nevertheless, PLGG can occur anywhere and can be in some locations associated with neurological symptoms, unresectable or radiological progressive tumors that need medical treatments rapidly to avoid long-term sequelae. The current problem during this first line therapy is to improve tumor response, overall survival rate, as well as progression free survival. In our study, we will focus on a specific group of PLGGs without any congenital NF1 mutation and with a wild-type BRAF gene in the tumor. In this subgroup, for instance, the PFS is not increasing anymore above 50% at 3 years independently from the chemotherapeutic scheme. The two current standard therapies are carboplatin plus vincristine during 81 weeks or a weekly IV administration of vinblastine during 70 weeks. The most recent Canadian approach with vinblastine seems to have the same PFS rate, but with a better daily tolerance and less toxicities than the carboplatin/vincristine combination. Therefore, it is becoming the new standard approach in those patients. Nevertheless, we need to improve more their outcome with less recurs and a better first-line tumor response. The recent molecular discoveries involving the Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in those PLGG is opening a new era with specific targeted therapies that might be the key to improve their survivals and giving hope to less treatment lines and a better tumor response. Therefore, we designed a prospective open randomized phase II study, named PLGG-MEKTRIC, comparing the experimental arm (a daily MEK inhibitor, Trametinib, Mekinist©) to a standard arm comprising weekly vinblastine during 18 courses of 4 weeks each. The study will enroll 134 patients with a PLGG during childhood, adolescence or young adulthood with no NF1-related disease and without any BRAFv600 mutation located in brain or spine. 67 patients, in each treatment arm, are planned to be enrolled to answer our primary objective. This primary objective will be to determine in the experimental arm a 20% superiority of the 3-year PFS rate in comparison with the standard treatment administered during 18 courses (e.g. 72 weeks). A stratification of the patients will be done in both arms based on molecular tumor results and brain/spine locations to obtain two equivalent arms to be analyzed.

The recruitment time will be 36 months and the complete follow-up of each patient will last 3 years. The secondary objectives will be in both arms: the tumor response rate at 24 and 72 weeks of treatment, the 3-year PFS and OS rates and the frequency of AE/SAE/SUSAR (Adverse Event/Serious Adverse Event) based on CTCAE criteria during the 3 years after the first administration. A Quality of Life (QoL) assessment, based on PEDsQL questionnaires, at 24 weeks, at the end of treatment and 3 years after 1st treatment administration in both arms will be part of this study. Finally, 3-year PFS and OS will be analyzed according to molecular biomarkers and visual assessment (LogMar scale) in each arm. An economic analysis is also planned as an ancillary study to determine a cost effectiveness of the best arm and complementary ancillary molecular studies are already organized. In the future, we hope to push forward this new-targeted therapy as a referenced first line treatment of pediatric PLGG to obtain the best tolerance and positive long-term impact and to extend our knowledge of MEK inhibitor impact in molecular subgroups and in optical pathway locations. We also plan to do a "switch" strategy in patients relapsing in standard arm and we will propose systematically to those patients the experimental treatment (MEK inhibitor ).

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age: ≥ 1 month to ≤ 25 years

Signed written informed consent prior to study participation of the legal representatives and the patient if the patient can understand the impact of clinical trial and to give consent. For patients above 18 years, their written informed consent will be obtained.

Patient may be under guardianship or curatorship (for patient under legal guardianship, authorization is given by the legal representative of the patient under guardianship. For patient under curatorship, consent will be obtained from the adult assisted by his or her legal curator

Histologically proven grade 1 glioma/mixed glio-neuronal tumors or pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA) confirmed by local referee and the centrally pathology reviewing

Disqualifiers

None

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Trametinib

    Drug

    Mekinist© (Trametinib) taken orally each day with a 18-course schedule of 4 weeks each.

  • Vinblastine

    Drug

    weekly intra-venous Vinblastine (Velbe©) during 18 courses of 4 weeks each

Treatment groups

134 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Trametinib experimental armExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Vinblastine control armActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

The primary endpoint is the 3-year PFS (Progression Free Survival rates) comparing the two arms (standard vs experimental).

Time frame
At 3 years

Secondary outcomes

1

the OS rate:

the OS calculation will take into account the survival measured from time of 1st treatment administration up to death

Time frame
At 3 years
2

the tumor response based on the international and recognized RANO criteria,

the analysis comparing the 2 arms will be based on overall response rate (ORR) by central independent radiological review assessment. The analysis will be conducted in all patients at least at 24 weeks of completed treatment or earlier for the patients who have discontinued for progression reasons. The tumor response will classify the patients in 2 groups: PD subgroup versus CR/PR/SD subgroup.

Time frame
at 24 weeks
3

the tumor response based on the international and recognized RANO criteria,

the analysis comparing the 2 arms will be based on overall response rate (ORR) by central independent radiological review assessment. The analysis will be conducted in all patients at least at 24 weeks of completed treatment or earlier for the patients who have discontinued for progression reasons. The tumor response will classify the patients in 2 groups: PD subgroup versus CR/PR/SD subgroup.

Time frame
at 72 weeks
4

the frequency and description of AE (adverse event)/SAE (serious adverse event)

based on CTCAE criteria (using NCI-CTCAE version 5.0) focusing on visual disturbances, skin, intestinal and cardiac side effects in the experimental arm compared with the standard control arm.

Time frame
At the end of Cycle 18 (each cycle is 28 days)

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.