Preventing of GVHD with Post-transplantation Cyclophosphamide, Abatacept, Vedolizumab and Ruxolitinib At Children and Young Adults with Hemoblastosis

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 2, Phase 3
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age1-21
SponsorFederal Research Institute of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology

About this trial

GVHD prevention using a combination of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide in combination with abatacept, vedolizumab and Ruxolitinib in children and young adults with hematoloblastosis after myeloablative conditioning regimen with treosulfan/TBI, etoposide, fludarabine after HSCT from matched unrelated and haploidentical donors

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

acute lymphoblastic,

myeloblastic,

biphenotypic,

bilinear leukemia,

Disqualifiers

Patients with ALL outside clinical and hematological remission

Lansky/Karnowski index <70% (supplement No.1)

Heart function: left ventricular ejection fraction <40% according to ultrasound of the heart1

Kidney function: clearance of endogenous creatinine < 70 ml / min

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Conditioning regimen: Treosulfan 42 g/m2/course or total body irradiation 12 Gray/course, Etoposide 60 mg/kg , Fludarabine 150

    Drug

    The most significant adverse events limiting the use of HSCT from an unrelated donor are graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and prolonged immunodeficiency associated with the development of severe infectious complications. The use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide for the prevention of GVHD during allogeneic HSCT from unrelated and haploidentical donors has reduced the incidence of acute clinically significant GVHD in children to 25%, chronic GVHD to 12-30%, but the issue of GVHD control still remains extremely relevant. Emerging data on the use of abatacept, a selective blocker of the costimulatory signal from an antigen-presenting cell, in the prevention of intestinal GVHD and data on the effectiveness of Janus-kinase type 1/2 inhibitors (JAK-1/2) in the treatment and prevention of acute GVHD allow us to justify the use of these drugs in combination with post-transplant cyclophosphamide as a promising pharmacological platform for the prevention of GVHD.

Treatment groups

50 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: Prevention of GVHD: Cyclophosphamide, Abatacept, Vedolizumab, RuxolitinibExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

1. Cumulative Incidence stage II-IV after HSCT

Estimate the probability of developing acute GVHD stage II-IV after HSCT-

Time frame
up to 100 days
2

Kaplan Meier overal survival

Explore the safety based on an assessment of the frequency of occurrence severe (3-5 degrees) side effects of conditioning- 100-day transplant-associated mortality

Time frame
up to 100 days
3

1. Cumulative Incidence stage II-IV after HSCT

Estimate the probability of developing acute GVHD stage II-IV after HSCT

Time frame
up to 100-day
4

Kaplan Meier event free survival

Explore the safety based on an assessment of the frequency of occurrence severe (3-5 degrees) side effects of conditioning

Time frame
during 1 month

Secondary outcomes

1

event-free survival

Probability of developing a relapse of the primary disease, transplantation-associated mortality on the horizon of 100 days, general and event-free survival

Time frame
up to 100 days
2

Cumulative Incidence of leukocyte engraftment

Probability and kinetics of engraftment of leukocyte and platelet sprouts of donor origin

Time frame
up to 30 days
3

Cumulative Incidence of platelet engraftment

Probability and kinetics of engraftment of leukocyte and platelet sprouts of donor origin

Time frame
up to 30 days
4

Cumulative Incidence reactivation of CMV

Probability of reactivation of CMV, EBV, AdV, HHV6 infection

Time frame
up to 6 mouth or up to immunreconstitution

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.