Repeated Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for Radiation-Induced Hyposalivation and Xerostomia in Head and Neck Cancer Survivors

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phasePhase 2
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorChristian von Buchwald

About this trial

Dry mouth leads to debilitating symptoms 24/7. The two primary causes for dry mouth are Sjögrens disease and after radiotherapy of a head and neck cancer. Former clinical trials have investigated mesenchymal stem cell treatment for dry mouth with promising results. However, few of the participants evolved normal salivary flow rate. Therefore, in this randomized clinical trial, two treatments of mesenchymal stem cells are administered, 4 months apart. This has not been done before.

The hypothesis is that two treatments of mesenchymal stem cells results in a higher salivary flow rate and ameliorate symptoms from dry mouth.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Former radiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma, or adenocarcinoma, of the nasal sinus, larynx, pharynx, and oral cavity

WHO Performance status 0-1

Presence of xerostomia daily

UWS of 0.05 mL/min to 0.5 ml/min

Disqualifiers

Any malignant cancer diagnosis excluding head and neck cancers

Xerogenic medications at inclusion

Penicillin or streptomycin allergy assessed by health personnel

Any other previous or active disease of the salivary glands (e.g. Sjögren's Disease, sialolothiasis)

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • ALLOGENEIC AND EXPANDED ADIPOSE TISSUE-DERIVED MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS

    Drug

    Suspended in 10% DMSO. Manufactured by OUH CELL BENCH in Odense, Denmark.

  • Placebo

    Drug

    Sterile isotonic saline water

Treatment groups

100 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Mesenchymal Stem CellsExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: PlaceboPlacebo comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Unstimulated whole salivary flow rate

Unstimulated whole salivary flow rate measured in mL/min

Time frame
T=0 months, T=4 months and T=8 months (primary endpoint assessed after 8 months)

Secondary outcomes

1

Stimulated whole salivary flow rate

Stimulated whole salivary flow rate measured in mL/min

Time frame
T=0 months, T=4 months, T=8 months (Key secondary endpoint assessed after 8 months).
2

Patient-Reported Outcome of xerostomia: The Groningen Radiotherapy-Induced Xerostomia questionnaire (GRIX).

For evaluation of the participants´ perception of xerostomia, the participants will answer validated questionnaires in Danish.

Time frame
T=0 months, T=4 months, T=8 months (Key secondary endpoint assessed after 8 months).
3

Patient-Reported Outcome of xerostomia: The European organization for research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire, head and neck-35 (EORTC QLQ-H&N35).

For evaluation of the participants´ perception of xerostomia, the participants will answer validated questionnaires in Danish. Patients will fill out the EORTC-QLQ- H\&N35 (evaluates overall implications of the xerostomia) for the following domains: * HNDR: dry mouth * HNSS: sticky saliva * HNSW: swallowing

Time frame
T=0 months, T=4 months, T=8 months (Key secondary endpoint assessed after 8 months).
4

Immune response

Measured by positivity of de novo drug specific antibodies (binary outcome)

Time frame
T=0 months, T=4 months, T=8 months (Key secondary endpoint assessed after 8 months).

Other outcomes

1

Incidence of treatment-related adverse events and serious adverse events

Evaluated by serious adverse events (SAEs), Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reactions (SUSARs), treatment-related adverse events, and deaths.

Time frame
Continually assessed from inclusion (T=0 months) to last visit (T=24 months).
2

Outcome 1 to 6 assessed at long term follow-up

Time frame
T=0 months, T=4 months, T=8 months, T=12 months, and T=24 months
3

5-point transition scale for determining the minimal important difference (evaluated at 8 months)

The 5-point transition scale is critical in the exploratory secondary objective of developing Minimal Important Differences (MIDs) for all the outcome measures applied in the trial because it provides a subjective, patient-centered anchor to assess meaningful change. The scale, which typically ranges from "much worse" to "much better," captures participants' perceptions of change in their condition over time. By linking participants' responses on this scale to corresponding changes in clinical outcome measures, the transition scale helps identify the smallest change in those measures that is considered important or beneficial by the participants themselves. This subjective assessment of change is essential for establishing MIDs, as it ensures that the derived thresholds reflect clinically relevant improvements or deteriorations from the patients' perspectives.

Time frame
T=4 months, T=8 months.

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Christian von Buchwald

Lead sponsor

Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Sponsor institution

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: