Respiratory Muscle Training Before Surgery in Preventing Lung Complications in Patients With Stage I-IIIB Lung Cancer

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 2
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorRoswell Park Cancer Institute

About this trial

This phase II trial studies how well respiratory muscle training before surgery works in preventing lung complications after surgery in patients with stage I-IIIB lung cancer. Patients with lung cancer who choose to undergo surgical resection often have complications after surgery such as pneumonia, unplanned intubations, difficulty breathing and reduced physical functioning, and increased medical costs and a reduced quality of life. Improving pre-surgical pulmonary health through respiratory muscle training may improve respiratory muscle strength, response to surgery, and quality of life after surgery in patients with lung cancer.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Documented stage I-IIIb lung cancer or is undergoing surgery for diagnosis

Participant is able to speak, read, and comprehend English

Participant must be undergoing or is anticipated to either video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS or robotic surgery) or laparoscopic surgery for curative intent lung resection

Patients with or without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) prior to surgery will be included

Disqualifiers

Documented ischemic heart disease; congestive heart failure or; significant cardiac arrhythmias that would exclude them from having surgery

Overall medical frailty (clinician discretion) or ECOG > 2

Pregnant or nursing female participants

Unwilling or unable to follow protocol requirements

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Best Practice

    Other intervention

    Receive usual care

  • Laparoscopic Surgery

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo laparoscopic surgery

  • Quality-of-Life Assessment

    Other intervention

    Ancillary studies

  • Questionnaire Administration

    Other intervention

    Ancillary studies

  • Respiratory Muscle Training Device

    Device

    Use power lung device to complete RMT

  • Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo video-assisted thoracic surgery

Treatment groups

220 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Arm I (usual care)Active comparator 5 interventions
Group B: Arm II (RMT + usual care)Experimental treatment 6 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Change in inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength

Will be treated as a continuous variable and will be summarized by treatment group and time-point using the mean, median, standard deviation, and the appropriate percentiles. The effectiveness of the respiratory muscle training (RMT) program on each respiratory outcome will be assessed by comparing the preoperative change between groups using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model, with an adjustment for the pretreatment levels. For each outcome, the preoperative change (T1-T0) will be modeled as a function of treatment group (RMT versus usual care) and pre-treatment levels. A one-sided Wald type-test about coefficient for treatment group will evaluate whether the RMT program had a beneficial impact on the given respiratory outcome. All model assumptions will be verified graphically using quantile-quantile and residual plots. Transformations will be applied as appropriate.

Time frame
Baseline up to 12 months
2

Change in pulmonary function and respiratory muscle endurance

Will be treated as a continuous variable and will be summarized by treatment group and time-point using the mean, median, standard deviation, and the appropriate percentiles. The effectiveness of the RMT program on each respiratory outcome will be assessed by comparing the preoperative change between groups using an ANCOVA model, with an adjustment for the pretreatment levels. For each outcome, the preoperative change (T1-T0) will be modeled as a function of treatment group (RMT versus usual care) and pre-treatment levels. A one-sided Wald type-test about coefficient for treatment group will evaluate whether the RMT program had a beneficial impact on the given respiratory outcome. All model assumptions will be verified graphically using quantile-quantile and residual plots. Transformations will be applied as appropriate.

Time frame
Baseline up to 12 months
3

Change in peak exercise capacity (VO2peak)

Will be treated as a continuous variable and will be summarized by treatment group and time-point using the mean, median, standard deviation, and the appropriate percentiles. The effectiveness of the RMT program on each respiratory outcome will be assessed by comparing the preoperative change between groups using an ANCOVA model, with an adjustment for the pretreatment levels. For each outcome, the preoperative change (T1-T0) will be modeled as a function of treatment group (RMT versus usual care) and pre-treatment levels. A one-sided Wald type-test about coefficient for treatment group will evaluate whether the RMT program had a beneficial impact on the given respiratory outcome. All model assumptions will be verified graphically using quantile-quantile and residual plots. Transformations will be applied as appropriate.

Time frame
Baseline up to 12 months

Secondary outcomes

1

Metabolic and muscle physiology marker analysis

Assays of muscle biopsies will be performed for metabolic and muscle physiology markers. The correlative markers will be compared between RMT responders, RMT non-responders, and usual care (control) in a pairwise fashion using Holm-Bonferroni adjusted t-tests. Responders will be those who present with a \> 15% increase in inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength. The gene-level raw count values of micro ribonucleic acid (mRNA)s will be analyzed with the edgeR Bioconductor package in R, first for normalization with the trimmed mean of M-values method, and then for comparison of expression between treatments using generalized linear models with negative binomial distribution and a likelihood ratio test to generate p values. False discovery rates (FDR) will be estimated from p-values with the Benjamini-Hochberg method, and mRNAs/genes with FDR \< 0.05 and fold-change values of \>= 1 log2 unit will be considered as differentially expressed.

Time frame
At time of surgical resection
2

Gene expression ribonucleic acid (RNA) extraction, reverse transcription, and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis

Assays of muscle biopsies will be performed for gene expression of RNA extraction, reverse transcription and real-time PCR. The correlative markers will be compared between RMT responders, RMT non-responders, and usual care (control) in a pairwise fashion using Holm-Bonferroni adjusted t-tests. Responders will be those who present with a \> 15% increase in inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength. The gene-level raw count values of mRNAs will be analyzed with the edgeR Bioconductor package in R, first for normalization with the trimmed mean of M-values method, and then for comparison of expression between treatments using generalized linear models with negative binomial distribution and a likelihood ratio test to generate p values. FDR will be estimated from p-values with the Benjamini-Hochberg method, and mRNAs/genes with FDR \< 0.05 and fold-change values of \>= 1 log2 unit will be considered as differentially expressed.

Time frame
At time of surgical resection
3

Change in quality of life (QoL)

Will be measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) - Core (C)30. The QoL measures are treated as continuous and will be summarized by treatment group and time-point using the mean, median, standard deviation, and the appropriate percentiles. The change in QoL measures (from baseline) will be modeled as a function of treatment group, time-point, their two-way interaction, and baseline levels using a general linear model. Comparisons of QoL at each time-point will utilize Holm-Bonferroni adjusted tests about the appropriate contrasts of model estimates. All model assumptions will be verified graphically using quantile-quantile and residual plots. Transformations will be applied as appropriate.

Time frame
Baseline up to 12 months
4

Change in QoL

Will be measured by EORTC QLQ - Lung Cancer 13. The QoL measures are treated as continuous and will be summarized by treatment group and time-point using the mean, median, standard deviation, and the appropriate percentiles. The change in QoL measures (from baseline) will be modeled as a function of treatment group, time-point, their two-way interaction, and baseline levels using a general linear model. Comparisons of QoL at each time-point will utilize Holm-Bonferroni adjusted tests about the appropriate contrasts of model estimates. All model assumptions will be verified graphically using quantile-quantile and residual plots. Transformations will be applied as appropriate.

Time frame
Baseline up to 12 months

Other outcomes

1

Total hospital length of stay (LOS)

Will be treated as continuous data and will be summarized by treatment group using the mean, median, standard deviation, and the appropriate percentiles. Comparisons between treatment groups will be made using one-sided t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests (as appropriate).

Time frame
Up to 12 months
2

Total intensive care unit LOS

Will be treated as continuous data and will be summarized by treatment group using the mean, median, standard deviation, and the appropriate percentiles. Comparisons between treatment groups will be made using one-sided t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests (as appropriate).

Time frame
Up to 12 months
3

Pre-operative LOS

Will be treated as continuous data and will be summarized by treatment group using the mean, median, standard deviation, and the appropriate percentiles. Comparisons between treatment groups will be made using one-sided t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests (as appropriate).

Time frame
From date of admission to the date of surgery
4

Lung infection rates

Lung infection will be treated as dichotomous data and will be summarized by treatment group using frequencies and relative frequencies. Comparison of infection rates between treatment groups will be made using Fisher?s exact test.

Time frame
Up to 12 months

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Roswell Park Cancer Institute

Lead sponsor

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Collaborator