Retifanlimab with Bevacizumab and Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Recurrent Glioblastoma

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 2
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorAcademic and Community Cancer Research United

About this trial

This phase II trial tests how well retifanlimab with bevacizumab and hypofractionated radiotherapy, compared to bevacizumab and hypofractionated radiotherapy alone, works in treating patients with glioblastoma that has come back after a period of improvement (recurrent). A monoclonal antibody is a type of protein that can bind to certain targets in the body, such as molecules that cause the body to make an immune response (antigens). Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as retifanlimab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Bevacizumab is in a class of medications called antiangiogenic agents. It works by stopping the formation of blood vessels that bring oxygen and nutrients to tumor. This may slow the growth and spread of tumor. Hypofractionated radiation therapy delivers higher doses of radiation therapy over a shorter period of time and may kill more tumor cells and have fewer side effects. Giving retifanlimab with bevacizumab and hypofractionated radiotherapy may work better in treating patients with recurrent glioblastoma than bevacizumab and hypofractionated radiotherapy alone.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age ≥ 18 years

Recurrent World Health Organization (WHO) grade IV glioblastoma. Note: Any number of recurrences are allowable. Glioblastoma (GBM) variants and molecular GBM are allowed

Candidates for radiotherapy

Prior use of bevacizumab is allowed as long as the last treatment is > 4 months prior to randomization

Disqualifiers

Pregnant persons

Nursing persons

Persons of childbearing potential who are unwilling to employ adequate contraception (men and women)

Co-morbid systemic illness or other severe concurrent disease which, in the judgement of the investigator, would make the patient inappropriate for entry into the study or interfere significantly with the proper assessment of safety and toxicity of the prescribed regimens

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Bevacizumab

    Biological/Vaccine

    Given IV

  • Biospecimen Collection

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo blood sample collection

  • Computed Tomography

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo CT

  • Electronic Health Record Review

    Other intervention

    Ancillary studies

  • Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy

    Radiation

    Undergo radiation therapy

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo MRI

  • Retifanlimab

    Biological/Vaccine

    Given IV

Treatment groups

134 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Arm A (Retifanlimab, bevacizumab and HFRT)Experimental treatment 7 interventions
Group B: Arm B (Bevacizumab and radiation)Experimental treatment 6 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Overall survival (OS)

Defined as the proportion of patients who are alive 9 months after randomization based on Kaplan Meier estimate. The proportion of patients alive will be compared between treatment arms using a z-score test statistic. The 9-month OS Kaplan Meier estimate and corresponding 95% confidence interval for each arm will be reported.

Time frame
Time until death from any cause, assessed up to 9 months after registration

Secondary outcomes

1

OS

Overall survival is defined as the time from registration to death from any cause. OS will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The logrank test will be used to compare the distribution between treatment arms. The median OS and corresponding 95% confidence interval (by Brookmeyer and Crowley) will be reported for each treatment arm.

Time frame
Up to 4 years after registration
2

Progression free survival (PFS)

Progression free survival is defined as the time from randomization to documentation of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever is first. The distribution of PFS will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. PFS will be compared between the 2 treatment arms using the log-rank test. The median PFS and corresponding 95% confidence intervals will be reported.

Time frame
Up to 4 years after registration
3

Objective response rate (ORR)

Objective response is defined as experiencing a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) (as defined by RANO criteria, see section 11.0) while on protocol treatment. Objective response rate (ORR) is defined as the number of patients who experience objective response divided by the number of patients in the primary analysis population. ORR will be compared between the 2 treatment arms. Confidence intervals for ORR will be calculated according to the approach of Clopper and Pearson. Overall response rate and the corresponding 95% confidence interval will be reported.

Time frame
Up to 4 years after registration
4

Neurologic function domain scores

Neurologic function domain scores of the Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology be summarized by descriptive statistics including mean, median, standard deviation, and range for each regimen at each time point. The difference between baseline and 2 months (1st restaging scan) will be compared using a Wilcoxon Rank Sum test across arm for each domain. The median difference for each domain and 1st and 3rd quartile will be reported for each arm.

Time frame
Up to 2 months after registration

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Academic and Community Cancer Research United

Lead sponsor

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Collaborator