Sacituzumab Tirumotecan vs MMAE-ADCs in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma (FUSCC-SPARE-UC-01)

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phasePhase 2
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorFudan University

About this trial

The main goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a new targeted cancer drug called sacituzumab tirumotecan (sac-TMT) works to treat cancer while causing less nerve damage in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who have progressed on or could not tolerate previous treatment such as enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab (EVP) or disitamab vedotin plus toripalimab (DVT).

The main question it aims to answer is: Does sac-TMT lower the risk of getting severe nerve damage, as measured together by doctors, machines, and the participants?

Researchers will compare sac-TMT to alternative MMAE-based ADC drugs (switching to a different MMAE-based ADC after the first one stopped working) to see if sac-TMT causes less nerve damage while still effectively treating the cancer. A small group of participants who had to stop their previous MMAE-based ADC treatment because of nerve damage will also receive sac-TMT to learn if the drug is safe for their nerves.

Participants will:

1. Receive either sac-TMT or another MMAE-based ADC drug 2. Have regular physical exams by a doctor to check their nerves 3. Have machine tests to measure how well their nerves work 4. Answer survey questions about their pain, numbness, and daily activities

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Must voluntarily sign the written Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Ethics Committee (EC) approved informed consent form (ICF) prior to any screening procedures.

Age > 18 years at the time of signing the ICF.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed locally advanced (unresectable) or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC), including bladder, ureter, renal pelvis, or urethra. Participants with mixed histology are eligible provided that UC is the predominant component (> 50%).

Must have received at least one prior line of systemic therapy for locally advanced or metastatic UC (e.g., Enfortumab Vedotin plus Pembrolizumab, Disitamab Vedotin plus Toripalimab, platinum-based chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, Nectin-4 ADCs, HER2 ADCs, FGFR inhibitors, or other palliative chemotherapy regimens).

Disqualifiers

Prior treatment with TROP2-targeted ADCs, topoisomerase I inhibitors (e.g., irinotecan, topotecan), or ADCs containing topoisomerase I inhibitor payloads.

Patients previously treated with both Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) and Disitamab Vedotin (DV) are excluded from Cohorts A and B (eligible for Cohort C only).

Treatment with any investigational anti-tumor agents, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, monoclonal antibodies, targeted therapy, or radical radiotherapy within 2 weeks or 5 half-lives (whichever is shorter) prior to the first dose. Major surgery within 4 weeks prior to the first dose.

Active CNS or meningeal metastases. Patients with previously treated CNS metastases are eligible if clinically stable for ≥ 4 weeks, off systemic corticosteroids for ≥ 2 weeks (physiological replacement ≤ 10 mg/day prednisone equivalent is allowed), and no evidence of radiographic progression.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Sacituzumab Tirumotecan

    Drug

    4.0 mg/kg intravenously administered on Day 1 every 2 weeks.

  • MMAE-based ADC

    Drug

    EV (Enfortumab Vedotin): 1.25 mg/kg administered intravenously on Days 1, 8, and 15 of every 4 weeks. DV (Disitamab Vedotin): 2.0 mg/kg administered intravenously on Day 1 of every 2 weeks.

  • Sacituzumab Tirumotecan (Observational Cohort)

    Drug

    4.0 mg/kg intravenously administered on Day 1 every 2 weeks.

Treatment groups

75 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: ExperimentalExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Active ComparatorActive comparator 1 intervention
Group C: ObservationalOther 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Peripheral Neuropathy Progression Rate (PNPR)

The PNPR is defined as the proportion of participants who experience their first occurrence of treatment-emergent peripheral neurotoxicity of Grade 2 or higher from the time of randomization until the end of treatment. Neurotoxicity severity is graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 5.0, a 5-point ordinal scale ranging from Grade 1 (mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only) to Grade 5 (death related to adverse event). Higher grades indicate worse outcomes (i.e., more severe neurotoxicity). The difference in PNPR between treatment arms will be analyzed using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test, adjusted for stratification factors specified in the protocol.

Time frame
From randomization up to the end of treatment (approximately 24 months).

Secondary outcomes

1

Percent Change in NCS Parameters

The NCS percentage change is calculated as the relative change in electrophysiological parameters from baseline to each post-baseline assessment. The formula used is: \[(Post-baseline Value - Baseline Value) / Baseline Value\] × 100%.

Time frame
Baseline, and at protocol-specified time points (including the time of first occurrence of Grade ≥2 neurotoxicity symptoms) during the treatment period, up to approximately 24 months.
2

Cumulative Neurotoxicity Burden (CNB)

Cumulative Neurotoxicity Burden (CNB) quantifies total peripheral neurotoxicity exposure, incorporating both severity and duration. Neurotoxicity grades are assigned using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 5.0, a 5-point ordinal scale ranging from Grade 1 (mild) to Grade 5 (death); higher grades indicate worse outcomes. Two complementary CNB metrics are calculated: 1. Raw CNB: trapezoidal AUC of NCI-CTCAE grades plotted against time from randomization to end of treatment. Unit: grade-months. 2. Time-Standardized CNB (CNB-TS): Raw CNB divided by total observation duration, expressed as mean grade per unit time. CNB-TS = AUC / T(observation). This standardizes burden across participants with differing treatment durations. Higher values of both metrics indicate worse outcomes. Between-arm comparisons will use mixed-effects models adjusted for stratification factors.

Time frame
From randomization up to the end of treatment (approximately 24 months).
3

Health-Related Quality of Life: EORTC QLQ-C30

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), a 30-item validated cancer- specific questionnaire comprising 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain), 6 single-item symptom assessments, and a global health status/quality of life scale. All scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. For functional scales and the global health status/QoL scale, higher scores indicate better functioning or better quality of life (better outcomes). For symptom scales and single items, higher scores indicate a higher level of symptom burden (worse outcomes). Mean changes from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 subscale scores will be compared between treatment arms using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM), adjusted for stratification factors.

Time frame
From randomization up to the end of treatment (approximately 24 months), assessed at baseline and at protocol-specified time points.
4

Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Symptoms: EORTC QLQ-CIPN20

Patient-reported peripheral neuropathy symptoms are assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy 20-item module (EORTC QLQ-CIPN20), a validated 20-item instrument designed to specifically capture sensory, motor, and autonomic symptoms of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale (1 = "Not at all" to 4 = "Very much"). Raw scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores indicate a higher level of peripheral neuropathy symptom burden (worse outcomes). Mean changes from baseline in EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 sensory, motor, and autonomic subscale scores will be compared between treatment arms using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM), adjusted for stratification factors.

Time frame
From randomization up to the end of treatment (approximately 24 months), assessed at baseline and at protocol-specified time points.

Other outcomes

1

Serum Neurofilament Light Chain (sNfL) Levels

Serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) is a blood-based biomarker of neuronal axonal injury. Elevated sNfL levels reflect ongoing axonal damage and have been validated as a biomarker for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy and other neurodegenerative conditions. sNfL concentration is measured in serum using a quantitative single-molecule array (Simoa) immunoassay. Results are reported in picograms per milliliter (pg/mL). Higher sNfL levels indicate greater axonal injury (worse neurological outcomes). Outcomes assessed include: (1) absolute sNfL concentration at each time point, (2) change from baseline in sNfL concentration, and (3) fold change in sNfL from baseline. Between-arm comparisons will be performed using mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) on log-transformed values.

Time frame
Baseline, and at protocol-specified time points during treatment (including the time of first occurrence of Grade ≥2 neurotoxicity symptoms), up to approximately 24 months.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: