Testing Repeat Radiation Therapy for Recurrent Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phasePhase 2
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorNRG Oncology

About this trial

This phase II trial compares repeat radiation therapy (RT) to standard drug treatment alone in treating patients with stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that has come back after initial radiation at or adjacent to the site of the original tumor (locally recurrent). Radiation therapy uses high energy x-rays, particles, or radioactive seeds to kill cancer cells and shrink tumors. Chemotherapy drugs used in standard drug treatment work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Immunotherapy drugs used in standard drug treatment may induce changes in body's immune system and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Targeted therapy drugs used in standard treatment identify and attack specific tumor cells. This trial may help doctors determine whether repeat RT delays the cancer from growing or spreading by 6 months or more after initial radiation compared to standard drug treatment alone in patients with stage II-III locally recurrent NSCLC.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

History of stage II-III NSCLC treated with fractionated (≤ 4 Gy per fraction) curative-intent (total dose ≥ 45 Gy) thoracic radiotherapy, completed ≥ 12 months before study entry

Participants must have recurrent/progressive disease in the lung and/or regional lymph nodes that is not suitable for treatment with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and for which palliative thoracic radiotherapy is not required at the time of study entry

Biopsy to confirm recurrent/progressive disease at some point after the previous course of thoracic radiotherapy and before entering this study is required

A portion of the disease that would be treated with radiotherapy on Arm 2 of this protocol must fall within the 50% isodose cloud of the radiotherapy plan

Disqualifiers

None

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Biospecimen Collection

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo blood sample collection

  • Computed Tomography

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo PET/CT and/or chest CT

  • Immunotherapy

    Other intervention

    Given SOC immunotherapy

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo MRI

  • Positron Emission Tomography

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo PET/CT

  • Radiation Therapy

    Radiation

    Undergo repeat RT

  • Systemic Chemotherapy

    Drug

    Given SOC chemotherapy

  • Targeted Therapy

    Other intervention

    Given SOC targeted therapy

Treatment groups

138 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Arm 1 (SOC systemic therapy)Active comparator 6 interventions
Group B: Arm 2 (repeat RT, chemotherapy)Experimental treatment 6 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Progression-free survival (PFS)

The primary analysis of PFS will be conducted in the intent-to-treat population, defined as all randomized patients. The distributions of PFS will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The primary comparison between arms will use a one-sided stratified log-rank test with the randomization stratification factors. A stratified Cox proportional hazards model will be used to estimate the hazard ratio and corresponding confidence interval. An unstratified log-rank test and unstratified Cox proportional hazards model will also be provided as sensitivity analyses. No post hoc modification or collapsing of stratification categories based on observed event counts will be performed. If the stratified Cox model is not estimable because of sparse data, the unstratified Cox model will be used to summarize the treatment hazard ratio and confidence interval, with the reason documented.

Time frame
From randomization to the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 5 years

Secondary outcomes

1

Overall survival

Will be summarized using Kaplan-Meier methods. Comparisons between arms will be summarized descriptively using hazard ratio estimates and corresponding confidence intervals.

Time frame
From randomization to death from any cause, assessed up to 5 years
2

Incidence of clinician-scored treatment-related adverse events

Clinician-scored adverse events will be summarized by study arm using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). For each patient, the maximum severity reported for each adverse event will be used in the summaries. Adverse events will be summarized regardless of relationship to protocol treatment as assessed by the investigator. All adverse events, adverse events leading to withdrawal, interruption or modification of protocol treatment, Grade ≥ 3 adverse events, and serious adverse events will be summarized. Deaths and cause of death will be summarized. Event summaries will be presented by type, grade, and attribution and will be performed at the time of the primary endpoint analysis.

Time frame
Up to 5 years
3

Incidence of patient-reported adverse events

A composite grading algorithm (Basch 2021) will be utilized to derive a single numerical grade for each adverse event scored at each timepoint using Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO)-CTCAE. Patient-reported adverse events measured using PRO-CTCAE will also be summarized descriptively by arm and time point, together with compliance and missing-data patterns.

Time frame
Up to 5 years
4

Site of first disease progression

Patterns of first failure will be summarized descriptively by arm using the categories specified in the protocol, including locoregional/intrathoracic progression, distant progression, or both. Formal hypothesis testing for these secondary endpoints is not planned unless otherwise specified in a future statistical analysis plan.

Time frame
Up to 5 years

Other outcomes

1

Clinical and dosimetric predictors of high-grade treatment-related toxicity

These analyses will be restricted to patients who initiate protocol reirradiation and will be descriptive and hypothesis-generating. Candidate predictors may include baseline clinical characteristics, prior treatment characteristics, and dosimetric parameters from the reirradiation and composite treatment plans. Associations with high-grade treatment-related toxicity will be summarized using appropriate descriptive and regression-based methods, as feasible given the number of observed events.

Time frame
Up to 5 years
2

Radiotherapy modality toxicity and efficacy outcomes

Will include descriptive comparisons of toxicity and efficacy outcomes, including time-to-event outcomes and treatment-related adverse events, among patients treated with proton versus photon radiotherapy within Arm 2. Because radiotherapy modality is selected by the treating team and not randomized within Arm 2, these analyses will be considered descriptive and hypothesis-generating only.

Time frame
Up to 5 years
3

Regional lung ventilation metrics

Among Arm 2 patients with available four-dimensional computed tomography planning scans, additional exploratory analyses may derive regional lung ventilation metrics and evaluate their association with pulmonary toxicity. These analyses are intended to identify potential imaging-based predictors of pulmonary toxicity and to generate hypotheses for future study.

Time frame
Up to 5 years

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: