Testing the Addition of the Anti-cancer Drug Venetoclax and/or the Anti-cancer Immunotherapy Blinatumomab to the Usual Chemotherapy Treatment for Infants With Newly Diagnosed KMT2A-rearranged or KMT2A-non-rearranged Leukemia

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 2
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
AgeUp to 365
SponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)

About this trial

This phase II trial tests the addition of venetoclax and/or blinatumomab to usual chemotherapy for treating infants with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) with a KMT2A gene rearrangement (KMT2A-rearranged \[R\]) or without a KMT2A gene rearrangement (KMT2A-germline \[G\]). Venetoclax is in a class of medications called B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) inhibitors. It may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking Bcl-2, a protein needed for cancer cell survival. Blinatumomab is a monoclonal antibody that may interfere with the ability of cancer cells to grow and spread. Chemotherapy drugs work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Adding venetoclax and/or blinatumomab to standard chemotherapy may be more effective at treating patients with ALL than standard chemotherapy alone, but it may also cause more side effects. This clinical trial evaluates the safety and effectiveness of adding venetoclax and/or blinatumomab to chemotherapy for the treatment of infants with KMT2A-R or KMT2A-G ALL.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

All patients must be enrolled on APEC14B1 and consented to eligibility screening (part A) prior to treatment and enrollment on AALL2321

Infants (aged 365 days or less) on the date of diagnosis are eligible; infants must be > 36 weeks gestational age (cumulative prenatal and postnatal age must be > 36 weeks) at the time of enrollment

Patients must have newly diagnosed B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL, 2017 World Health Organization [WHO] classification), also termed B-precursor ALL, or acute leukemia of ambiguous lineage (ALAL), which includes mixed phenotype acute leukemia. For patients with ALAL, the immunophenotype of the leukemia must comprise at least 50% B lineage

Diagnostic immunophenotype: Leukemia cells must express CD19

Disqualifiers

Patients with Down Syndrome

Patients with secondary B-ALL that developed after treatment of a prior malignancy with cytotoxic chemotherapy

PredniSONE, prednisoLONE, or methylPREDNISolone for ≤ 72 hours (3 days) in the 7 days prior to enrollment. The dose of predniSONE, prednisoLONE or methylPREDNISolone does not affect eligibility

Inhaled and topical steroids are not considered pretreatment

Trial design

Design model

Sequential

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Asparaginase Erwinia chrysanthemi

    Drug

    Given recombinant crisantaspase IM or crisantaspase IM or IV

  • Biospecimen Collection

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo collection of blood samples

  • Blinatumomab

    Biological/Vaccine

    Given IV

  • Bone Marrow Aspiration

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo bone marrow aspiration

  • Calaspargase Pegol

    Drug

    Given IV

  • Computed Tomography

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo CT

  • Cyclophosphamide

    Drug

    Given IV

  • Cytarabine

    Drug

    Given IT or IV

  • Daunorubicin

    Drug

    Given IV

  • Dexamethasone

    Drug

    Given PO or NG or IV

  • Doxorubicin

    Drug

    Given IV

  • Echocardiography Test

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo ECHO

  • FDG-Positron Emission Tomography

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo FDG-PET

  • Leucovorin

    Drug

    Given PO or NG or IV

  • Levoleucovorin

    Drug

    Given IV

  • Lumbar Puncture

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo lumbar puncture

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo MRI

  • Mercaptopurine

    Drug

    Given PO or NG

  • Methotrexate

    Drug

    Given IT or IV or PO or NG

  • Methylprednisolone

    Drug

    Given IV

  • Multigated Acquisition Scan

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo MUGA

  • Prednisolone

    Drug

    Given PO or NG

  • Prednisone

    Drug

    Given PO or NG

  • Therapeutic Hydrocortisone

    Drug

    Given IT

  • Thioguanine

    Drug

    Given PO or NG

  • Venetoclax

    Drug

    Given PO or NG

  • Vincristine

    Drug

    Given IV

Treatment groups

153 Participants
are divided into 8 treatment groups

8

Treatment groups

See each treatment group below.

Group A: Arm AExperimental treatment 22 interventions
Group B: Arm B, Cohort 1Experimental treatment 23 interventions
Group C: Arm B, Cohort 2Experimental treatment 23 interventions
Group D: Arm B, Cohort 3Experimental treatment 23 interventions
Group E: Arm B, Cohort 4Experimental treatment 23 interventions
Group F: Arm CExperimental treatment 25 interventions
Group G: Safety Phase CohortExperimental treatment 23 interventions
Group H: Steroid Prephase(prednisone, prednisolone, methylprednisolone)Experimental treatment 11 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) (safety phase)

For the safety phase, DLTs of the induction + venetoclax cycle of KMT2A-rearranged (R) patients will be assessed.

Time frame
For the duration of the induction + venetoclax cycle
2

Incidence of DLTs (expansion phase)

For the expansion phase, DLTs of Arm B will be assessed and monitored for the cycles that contain venetoclax (induction, consolidation, and MARMA cycles of Arm B).

Time frame
During the induction, consolidation, and MARMA cycles of Arm B
3

Minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative remission rate

The end of induction MRD-negative remission rate will be compared between Arm A and Arm B. MRD negativity is defined as achievement of complete remission and MRD \< 0.01% by flow cytometry. The MRD-negative remission rate at the end of induction between Arm A and Arm B will be compared using a one-sided Z test of proportions with Type I error of 0.15.

Time frame
At the end of induction

Secondary outcomes

1

MRD-negative remission rate

MRD-negative remission rate at the end of induction and the standard error or 95% confidence interval will be estimated among infants with KMT2A-R acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treated with venetoclax at the RP2D. This analysis will include eligible KMT2A-R patients treated with venetoclax at the RP2D in the safety phase, as well as patients randomized to Arm B and treated with venetoclax in the expansion phase. MRD negativity is defined as \< 0.01% by flow cytometry.

Time frame
At the end of induction
2

Event free survival (EFS) rates of infants with KMT2A-R ALL

The EFS rates from date of randomization of Arm B will be compared to Arm A. Comparison of EFS rates between Arm A and Arm B will be based on a one-sided logrank test with Type I error of 0.15. In addition, EFS rates will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with Greenwood standard errors. Hazard ratios and confidence intervals will be estimated based on Cox regression models as appropriate. Cumulative incidence rates of each EFS event type (relapse, treatment failure, secondary malignant neoplasm and death) will also be estimated and presented with cumulative incidence curves and compared between arms as appropriate.

Time frame
From date of randomization to treatment failure, first documented relapse following achievement of remission-1, occurrence of a second or secondary malignant neoplasm, or death, assessed up to 3 years
3

3-year EFS of infants with KMT2A-R ALL

For Arm A, the 3-year EFS rate (representing a plateau rate based on the shape of EFS curves of historical data in this patient population) from the date of randomization will be compared to the stable historical 3-year EFS rate of 35% observed in AALL0631 and other international trials.

Time frame
From date of randomization to treatment failure, first documented relapse following achievement of remission-1, occurrence of a second or secondary malignant neoplasm, or death, assessed up to 3 years
4

Proportion of KMT2A-germline (G) patients in Arm C who are able to receive all treatment cycles before maintenance

The feasibility of treating KMT2A-G patients with a high-risk ALL backbone and two cycles of blinatumomab (Arm C) will be assessed. Arm C treatment will be considered feasible for KMT2A-G patients if the proportion of KMT2A-G patients in Arm C who are able to receive all treatment cycles before maintenance (i.e., up to interim maintenance 2) is more than 76.8%. The proportion of patients receiving all cycles before Maintenance will be compared to 76.8% with a one-sample exact test of proportion with Type I error of 0.15.

Time frame
Up to interim maintenance 2

Other outcomes

1

3-year EFS of infants with KMT2A-R ALL treated on Arm B

Arm B, the 3-year EFS rate from date of randomization will be estimated, and will be compared to Arm A as described in the secondary objective, and to historical 3-year EFS. Comparison to historical rate will be based on a one-sample test of proportion with one-sided Type I error of 0.15.

Time frame
From date of randomization to treatment failure, first documented relapse following achievement of remission-1, occurrence of a second or secondary malignant neoplasm, or death, assessed up to 3 years
2

Use of high-throughput sequencing (HTS) for MRD detection in infant ALL compared to centralized flow cytometry

Pre-treatment HTS clonality and HTS MRD tracking results will be collected and compared to the required centralized flow cytometry-based MRD data to evaluate the feasibility and prognostic utility of HTS MRD evaluation in the infant ALL population.

Time frame
Up to 3 years
3

PK of calaspargase pegol in infants with ALL

PK of calaspargase pegol will be analyzed by monitoring asparaginase activity levels. Once a PK model is developed for calaspargase pegol, standard regression analysis will be used to describe the relationship between drug exposure and asparaginase activity. Additionally, asparaginase-associated toxicities will be described for the entire study population and correlated with activity levels when possible. The result of this analysis will be an estimation of potential optimal exposure expected to yield the maximum efficacy while limiting toxicity. These analyses will be exploratory and descriptive.

Time frame
At completion of the trial, up to 3 years
4

Incidence of CD19-negative relapse and myeloid switch relapse with protocol therapy

For patients who experience relapse, will collect information regarding the immunophenotype of the leukemic blasts at time of relapse. Will report on the rate of CD19 negative relapse as well as myeloid switch relapse for all patients enrolled on study. This analysis will be exploratory and descriptive.

Time frame
At the time of relapse, up to 3 years

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.