About this trial
This phase II trial tests the addition of venetoclax and/or blinatumomab to usual chemotherapy for treating infants with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) with a KMT2A gene rearrangement (KMT2A-rearranged \[R\]) or without a KMT2A gene rearrangement (KMT2A-germline \[G\]). Venetoclax is in a class of medications called B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) inhibitors. It may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking Bcl-2, a protein needed for cancer cell survival. Blinatumomab is a monoclonal antibody that may interfere with the ability of cancer cells to grow and spread. Chemotherapy drugs work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Adding venetoclax and/or blinatumomab to standard chemotherapy may be more effective at treating patients with ALL than standard chemotherapy alone, but it may also cause more side effects. This clinical trial evaluates the safety and effectiveness of adding venetoclax and/or blinatumomab to chemotherapy for the treatment of infants with KMT2A-R or KMT2A-G ALL.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
All patients must be enrolled on APEC14B1 and consented to eligibility screening (part A) prior to treatment and enrollment on AALL2321
Infants (aged 365 days or less) on the date of diagnosis are eligible; infants must be > 36 weeks gestational age (cumulative prenatal and postnatal age must be > 36 weeks) at the time of enrollment
Patients must have newly diagnosed B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL, 2017 World Health Organization [WHO] classification), also termed B-precursor ALL, or acute leukemia of ambiguous lineage (ALAL), which includes mixed phenotype acute leukemia. For patients with ALAL, the immunophenotype of the leukemia must comprise at least 50% B lineage
Diagnostic immunophenotype: Leukemia cells must express CD19
Disqualifiers
Patients with Down Syndrome
Patients with secondary B-ALL that developed after treatment of a prior malignancy with cytotoxic chemotherapy
PredniSONE, prednisoLONE, or methylPREDNISolone for ≤ 72 hours (3 days) in the 7 days prior to enrollment. The dose of predniSONE, prednisoLONE or methylPREDNISolone does not affect eligibility
Inhaled and topical steroids are not considered pretreatment
Trial design
Sequential
Treatments tested in this trial
Asparaginase Erwinia chrysanthemi
DrugGiven recombinant crisantaspase IM or crisantaspase IM or IV
Biospecimen Collection
Procedure/SurgeryUndergo collection of blood samples
Blinatumomab
Biological/VaccineGiven IV
Bone Marrow Aspiration
Procedure/SurgeryUndergo bone marrow aspiration
Calaspargase Pegol
DrugGiven IV
Computed Tomography
Procedure/SurgeryUndergo CT
Cyclophosphamide
DrugGiven IV
Cytarabine
DrugGiven IT or IV
Daunorubicin
DrugGiven IV
Dexamethasone
DrugGiven PO or NG or IV
Doxorubicin
DrugGiven IV
Echocardiography Test
Procedure/SurgeryUndergo ECHO
FDG-Positron Emission Tomography
Procedure/SurgeryUndergo FDG-PET
Leucovorin
DrugGiven PO or NG or IV
Levoleucovorin
DrugGiven IV
Lumbar Puncture
Procedure/SurgeryUndergo lumbar puncture
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Procedure/SurgeryUndergo MRI
Mercaptopurine
DrugGiven PO or NG
Methotrexate
DrugGiven IT or IV or PO or NG
Methylprednisolone
DrugGiven IV
Multigated Acquisition Scan
Procedure/SurgeryUndergo MUGA
Prednisolone
DrugGiven PO or NG
Prednisone
DrugGiven PO or NG
Therapeutic Hydrocortisone
DrugGiven IT
Thioguanine
DrugGiven PO or NG
Venetoclax
DrugGiven PO or NG
Vincristine
DrugGiven IV
Treatment groups
8
Treatment groupsSee each treatment group below.
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) (safety phase)
For the safety phase, DLTs of the induction + venetoclax cycle of KMT2A-rearranged (R) patients will be assessed.
Incidence of DLTs (expansion phase)
For the expansion phase, DLTs of Arm B will be assessed and monitored for the cycles that contain venetoclax (induction, consolidation, and MARMA cycles of Arm B).
Minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative remission rate
The end of induction MRD-negative remission rate will be compared between Arm A and Arm B. MRD negativity is defined as achievement of complete remission and MRD \< 0.01% by flow cytometry. The MRD-negative remission rate at the end of induction between Arm A and Arm B will be compared using a one-sided Z test of proportions with Type I error of 0.15.
Secondary outcomes
MRD-negative remission rate
MRD-negative remission rate at the end of induction and the standard error or 95% confidence interval will be estimated among infants with KMT2A-R acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treated with venetoclax at the RP2D. This analysis will include eligible KMT2A-R patients treated with venetoclax at the RP2D in the safety phase, as well as patients randomized to Arm B and treated with venetoclax in the expansion phase. MRD negativity is defined as \< 0.01% by flow cytometry.
Event free survival (EFS) rates of infants with KMT2A-R ALL
The EFS rates from date of randomization of Arm B will be compared to Arm A. Comparison of EFS rates between Arm A and Arm B will be based on a one-sided logrank test with Type I error of 0.15. In addition, EFS rates will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with Greenwood standard errors. Hazard ratios and confidence intervals will be estimated based on Cox regression models as appropriate. Cumulative incidence rates of each EFS event type (relapse, treatment failure, secondary malignant neoplasm and death) will also be estimated and presented with cumulative incidence curves and compared between arms as appropriate.
3-year EFS of infants with KMT2A-R ALL
For Arm A, the 3-year EFS rate (representing a plateau rate based on the shape of EFS curves of historical data in this patient population) from the date of randomization will be compared to the stable historical 3-year EFS rate of 35% observed in AALL0631 and other international trials.
Proportion of KMT2A-germline (G) patients in Arm C who are able to receive all treatment cycles before maintenance
The feasibility of treating KMT2A-G patients with a high-risk ALL backbone and two cycles of blinatumomab (Arm C) will be assessed. Arm C treatment will be considered feasible for KMT2A-G patients if the proportion of KMT2A-G patients in Arm C who are able to receive all treatment cycles before maintenance (i.e., up to interim maintenance 2) is more than 76.8%. The proportion of patients receiving all cycles before Maintenance will be compared to 76.8% with a one-sample exact test of proportion with Type I error of 0.15.
Other outcomes
3-year EFS of infants with KMT2A-R ALL treated on Arm B
Arm B, the 3-year EFS rate from date of randomization will be estimated, and will be compared to Arm A as described in the secondary objective, and to historical 3-year EFS. Comparison to historical rate will be based on a one-sample test of proportion with one-sided Type I error of 0.15.
Use of high-throughput sequencing (HTS) for MRD detection in infant ALL compared to centralized flow cytometry
Pre-treatment HTS clonality and HTS MRD tracking results will be collected and compared to the required centralized flow cytometry-based MRD data to evaluate the feasibility and prognostic utility of HTS MRD evaluation in the infant ALL population.
PK of calaspargase pegol in infants with ALL
PK of calaspargase pegol will be analyzed by monitoring asparaginase activity levels. Once a PK model is developed for calaspargase pegol, standard regression analysis will be used to describe the relationship between drug exposure and asparaginase activity. Additionally, asparaginase-associated toxicities will be described for the entire study population and correlated with activity levels when possible. The result of this analysis will be an estimation of potential optimal exposure expected to yield the maximum efficacy while limiting toxicity. These analyses will be exploratory and descriptive.
Incidence of CD19-negative relapse and myeloid switch relapse with protocol therapy
For patients who experience relapse, will collect information regarding the immunophenotype of the leukemic blasts at time of relapse. Will report on the rate of CD19 negative relapse as well as myeloid switch relapse for all patients enrolled on study. This analysis will be exploratory and descriptive.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.