Testing the Use of High Dose Testosterone Followed by Darolutamide Compared to the Usual Care for Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phasePhase 2, Phase 3
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group

About this trial

This phase II/II trial compares the effect of high dose testosterone followed by darolutamide with the usual care in treating patients with prostate cancer that has spread from where it first started (primary site) to other places in the body (metastatic) and keeps growing even when the amount of testosterone in the body is reduced to very low levels (castration-resistant). Usual care treatment for patients with metastatic prostate cancer includes surgery or medical castration which involves drugs to suppress the function of the testes. After receiving this therapy, a period of disease stability occurs, followed typically by cancer regrowth and castration-resistant disease. Castration-resistant prostate cancer occurs because the tumor cells are eventually able to adapt to the very low levels of testosterone in the body. A new type of therapy called Bipolar Androgen Therapy (BAT) involves giving patients very high doses of testosterone every 28 days. This results in a cycle of higher than normal testosterone levels (i.e., "supraphysiologic") to near castrate levels over the 28 days. BAT may be able to stop prostate tumor cells from becoming castrate-resistant. In this trial, patients who receive BAT with high dose testosterone and experience disease progression then receive darolutamide. Darolutamide is in a class of medications called androgen receptor inhibitors. It works by blocking the effects of androgen (a male reproductive hormone) to stop the growth and spread of tumor cells. Adding BAT with high dose testosterone prior to darolutamide after disease progression may help shrink or stabilize metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer better than usual treatments alone.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patient must be ≥ 18 years of age

Patient must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0-2

Patient must have documented histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression defined as PSA ≥ 2 ng/mL and rising on two successive measurements at least 14 days apart (most recent PSA value must be within 28 days prior to randomization) AND

Disqualifiers

None

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Abiraterone Acetate

    Drug

    Given PO

  • Biospecimen Collection

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo biospecimen collection

  • Bone Scan

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo bone imaging

  • Cabazitaxel

    Drug

    Given IV

  • Computed Tomography

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo CT

  • Darolutamide

    Drug

    Given PO

  • Dexamethasone

    Drug

    Given dexamethasone

  • Docetaxel

    Drug

    Given IV

  • Enzalutamide

    Drug

    Given PO

  • Lutetium Lu 177 Vipivotide Tetraxetan

    Drug

    Given IV

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo MRI

  • Methylprednisolone

    Drug

    Given methylprednisolone

  • Prednisone

    Drug

    Given prednisone

  • Questionnaire Administration

    Other intervention

    Ancillary studies

  • Testosterone Cypionate

    Drug

    Given IM

Treatment groups

432 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Arm A (SOC1, SOC2)Active comparator 13 interventions
Group B: Arm B (testosterone cypionate, darolutamide)Experimental treatment 7 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Second progression-free survival (PFS2) (Phase II)

Definition of progression includes radiographic progression per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 or Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) for bone lesions, and clinical progression determined by treating physician. The phase II part will be conducted first and only if the treatment of Bipolar Androgen Therapy (BAT) followed by darolutamide significantly improves PFS2 compared to the SOC (SOC1 followed by SOC2) arm, then the study will continue to the phase III part. The primary comparisons will be an intention-to-treat analysis including all randomized patients. The phase II part of the study will have 89.5% power to detect the above difference in PFS2 using a one-sided 0.15 level stratified log-rank test.

Time frame
From randomization to disease progression or death, whichever occurs first after initiation of second treatment (standard of care [SOC]2 or darolutamide), assessed up to 60 months
2

Overall survival (OS) (Phase III)

The phase II part will be conducted first and only if the treatment of BAT followed by darolutamide significantly improves PFS2 compared to the SOC (SOC1 followed by SOC2) arm, then the study will continue to the phase III part. The primary comparisons will be an intention-to-treat analysis including all randomized patients.

Time frame
From randomization until death from any cause or date last known alive, assessed up to 60 months
3

Overall quality of life (QOL)

Will compare overall QOL, measured by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) total score, between the two arms. Mixed-effects models will be constructed, utilizing all available data, with fixed effects for treatment arm, assessment time, and the treatment-by-time interactions. A random intercept per patient will be included to account for within-subject correlations. Patients will rate physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being along with additional concerns on a scale from "not at all" to "very much". Interpretation of higher vs. lower scores being better is dependent on which subsection is being scored (i.e."I am able to work" rated as very much is not comparable to "I feel sad" rated as very much).

Time frame
At randomization,12, 24 and 48 weeks after randomization

Secondary outcomes

1

Progression-free survival (PFS)

Will be determined using RECIST 1.1 criteria (for soft tissue metastases) and PCWG3 criteria (for bone metastases). Will be evaluated for each of the two treatments in a given arm.

Time frame
From randomization to disease progression or death, whichever occurs first prior to initiation of the second treatment of the study, assessed up to 60 months
2

PFS

Will be determined using RECIST 1.1 criteria (for soft tissue metastases) and PCWG3 criteria (for bone metastases). Will be evaluated for each of the two treatments in a given arm.

Time frame
From initiation of second treatment to disease progression, clinical progression, or death, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 60 months
3

Radiographic response rate

Will be determined using RECIST 1.1 criteria. Will be evaluated for each of the two treatments in a given arm.

Time frame
From initial randomization up to 60 months
4

Radiographic response rate

Will be determined using RECIST 1.1 criteria. Will be evaluated for each of the two treatments in a given arm.

Time frame
From initiation of second treatment up to 60 months

Other outcomes

1

Estimates of the primary outcome treatment effect by sex

Will estimate the primary outcome treatment effect and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by sex.

Time frame
From randomization until death from any cause or date last known alive, assessed up to 60 months
2

Estimates of the primary outcome treatment effect by race

Will estimate the primary outcome treatment effect and the corresponding 95% CIs by race.

Time frame
Up to 60 months
3

Estimates of the primary outcome treatment effect by ethnicity

Will estimate the primary outcome treatment effect and the corresponding 95% CIs by ethnicity.

Time frame
Up to 60 months

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group

Lead sponsor

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: