Using Biomarker Tests to Select and Test New, Personalized Treatments for Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer, PRISM Study

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 2
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorSWOG Cancer Research Network

About this trial

This phase II trial tests how well biomarker tests on patients tumor tissue works in selecting personalized treatments for patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Biomarker tests look for certain features in cancer cells that may give doctors more information about what is driving cancer and how to treat it. Based on the biomarker test results, study doctors can determine the subtype of ES-SCLC that study treatments can target. This study also tests different types of maintenance treatment for ES-SCLC with drugs durvalumab, saruparib, ceralasertib or monalizumab. Maintenance treatment is given after initial treatment and is given to help keep the cancer under control and prevent it from getting worse. Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as durvalumab and monalizumab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Saruparib is a PARP inhibitor. PARP is a protein that helps repair damaged deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA). Blocking PARP may prevent cancer cells from repairing their damaged DNA, causing them to die. PARP inhibitors are a type of targeted therapy. Ceralasertib may stop the growth of tumor cells and may kill them by blocking some of the enzymes needed for tumor cell growth. Giving biomarker selected personalized maintenance treatment with durvalumab, saruparib, ceralasertib or monalizumab may work better in treating patients with ES-SCLC.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

STEP 1: SCREENING AND INDUCTION TREATMENT REGISTRATION: Participants must not have a prior or concurrent malignancy whose natural history or treatment (in the opinion of the treating physician) has the potential to interfere with the safety or efficacy assessment of the investigational regimen

STEP 1: SCREENING AND INDUCTION TREATMENT REGISTRATION: Participants must not have a history of limited stage small cell lung cancer

Treatment naïve and planning to receive frontline induction treatment with platinum plus etoposide in combination with durvalumab, OR,

Have initiated frontline induction therapy and completed at least 1 (≥ 1) cycle and at most 3 (≤ 3) cycles of platinum and etoposide. At most 2 (≤ 2) of these cycles could have been given without durvalumab

Disqualifiers

None

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Biospecimen Collection

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo tissue and blood sample collection

  • Ceralasertib

    Drug

    Given PO

  • Computed Tomography

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo CT scan

  • Durvalumab

    Biological/Vaccine

    Given IV

  • Etoposide

    Drug

    Given etoposide

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo MRI

  • Monalizumab

    Biological/Vaccine

    Given IV

  • Platinum Compound

    Drug

    Given platinum compound

  • Positron Emission Tomography

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo PET/CT scan

  • Saruparib

    Drug

    Given PO

  • Thoracic Radiation Therapy

    Radiation

    Undergo thoracic radiation

Treatment groups

900 Participants
are divided into 6 treatment groups

6

Treatment groups

See each treatment group below.

Group A: Cohort A, Arm 1 (durvalumab)Experimental treatment 8 interventions
Group B: Cohort A, Arm 2 (durvalumab, saruparib)Experimental treatment 9 interventions
Group C: Cohort B, Arm 1 (durvalumab)Experimental treatment 8 interventions
Group D: Cohort B, Arm 2 (durvalumab, ceralasertib)Experimental treatment 9 interventions
Group E: Cohort C, Arm 1 (durvalumab)Experimental treatment 8 interventions
Group F: Cohort C, Arm 2 (durvalumab, monalizumab)Experimental treatment 9 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Screen success rate (Screening)

Will test participants' tissue specimens to determine their eligibility to 1 of the 3 treatment cohorts created based on their small cell lung cancer (SCLC) subtype and SLFN11 status. Will evaluate rate of participants who successfully get a cohort assignment based on SCLC subtype and SLNFN11 status, as appropriate.

Time frame
Up to 3 years
2

Progression-free survival (PFS) (Cohort A)

Will compare PFS in participants with extensive stage SCLC (ES-SCLC) (subtypes A or N \& SLFN11 positive) or ES-SCLC (subtype P) randomized to durvalumab (MEDI4736) with or without saruparib (AZD5305) as maintenance therapy following induction chemoimmunotherapy with platinum, etoposide, and durvalumab (MEDI4736). Will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Associated confidence intervals about the median will be performed using the Brookmeyer-Crowley method. Binary proportions and associated confidence intervals will be calculated.

Time frame
From date of randomization to treatment within a cohort to date of first documentation of progression, symptomatic deterioration, or death due to any cause, assessed up to 3 years
3

PFS (Cohort B)

Will compare PFS in participants with ES-SCLC subtypes A or N and SLFN11 negative randomized to durvalumab with or without ceralasertib (AZD6738) as maintenance therapy following induction chemoimmunotherapy with cisplatin or carboplatin, etoposide, and durvalumab (MEDI4736). Will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Associated confidence intervals about the median will be performed using the Brookmeyer-Crowley method.

Time frame
From date of randomization to treatment within a cohort to date of first documentation of progression, symptomatic deterioration, or death due to any cause, assessed up to 3 years
4

PFS (Cohort C)

Will compare PFS participants with ES-SCLC subtype I randomized to durvalumab (MEDI4736) with or without monalizumab (IPH2201) as maintenance therapy following induction chemoimmunotherapy with cisplatin or carboplatin, etoposide, and durvalumab (MEDI4736). Will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Associated confidence intervals about the median will be performed using the Brookmeyer-Crowley method.

Time frame
From date of randomization to treatment within a cohort to date of first documentation of progression, symptomatic deterioration, or death due to any cause, assessed up to 3 years

Secondary outcomes

1

SCLC subtype status (Screening)

Will evaluate the percentage of participant tissue that are able to have SCLC subtype status determined.

Time frame
Up to 3 years
2

SLFN11 status (Screening)

Will evaluate the percentage of participant tissue that are able to have SLFN11 status determined.

Time frame
Up to 3 years
3

Assigned to a cohort and register to be randomized (Screening)

Will estimate the percentage of participants assigned to a cohort that register to be randomized.

Time frame
Up to 3 years
4

Incidence of dose limiting toxicity (DLT) (Cohort A, safety run-in)

Will evaluate the safety of saruparib (AZD5305) in combination with durvalumab by estimating the rate of DLTs in the safety-run-in population. Will be assessed by treatment-related grade 3 or higher non hematologic toxicity, treatment-related grade 4 or higher hematologic toxicity, or any grade of treatment-related toxicity that in the opinion of the treating physician directly leads to that participant decision to drug discontinuation.

Time frame
During the first cycle of treatment (each cycle is 28 days)

Other outcomes

1

Bank specimens

Will bank specimens for future correlative studies.

Time frame
Up to 3 years

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

SWOG Cancer Research Network

Lead sponsor

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Collaborator