About this trial
A randomized trial to determine whether simultaneous treatment with spectacles and patching has an equivalent VA outcome compared with sequential treatment, first with spectacles alone followed by patching (if needed), for previously untreated amblyopia in children 3 to \<13 years of age.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Age 3 to <13 years at the time of randomization
Amblyopia associated with anisometropia, strabismus, or both
Presence of a heterotropia on examination at distance or near fixation (with or without optical correction)
Documented history of strabismus which is no longer present (which in the judgment of the investigator could have caused amblyopia)
Disqualifiers
Myopia greater than -6.00 D spherical equivalent in either eye.
Previous intraocular or refractive surgery.
Planned strabismus surgery in the next 56 weeks.
Any previous treatment for amblyopia (patching, atropine, Bangerter filter, vision therapy, or binocular treatment).
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Patching
Other interventionProcedure in which the eye is covered utilizing a patch to increase the strength of the uncovered eye.
Glasses
Other interventionEye Glasses are created and worn by patient to improve vision
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Mean Change in Amblyopic Eye logMAR distance Visual Acuity
1. Amblyopic eye VA (calculated as mean of test and retest) at the last visit that was the basis for a "stable resolved" or "stable residual" determination (in the sequential group, stable residual amblyopia criteria can be reached only after patching has been instituted); or 2. 56-week visit amblyopic-eye VA (calculated as mean of test and retest) in those completing a 56-week visit without ever meeting criteria for "stable resolved" or "stable residual" amblyopia (if retest missing at 56 weeks, the single test value will be used).
Secondary outcomes
Pediatric Eye Questionnaire (PedEyeQ)
Rasch scores for each questionnaire item will be obtained from published look-up tables available at www.pedig.net, and used to calculate a score for each participant and a separate treatment group mean for the three PedEyeQ domains of the Child, Proxy and Parent PedEyeQ at randomization and at each visit. Scores will also be converted to a 0-100 scale to aid in interpretation. Multiplicity adjusted two sided P-values and confidence intervals will be produced. Child PedEyeQ: Functional Vision, Bothered by Eyes and Vision, Social, Frustration / Worry Proxy PedEyeQ: Functional Vision, Bothered by Eyes and Vision, Social, Frustration / Worry, Eyecare Parent PedEyeQ: Impact on Parent and Family, Worry about Child's Eye Condition, Worry about Self-perception and Interactions, Worry about Functional Vision
Proportion Achieving Stable Resolved Outcome with Spectacles Alone
The proportion of participants in the Sequential Spectacles group who achieve "stable resolved" outcome status with spectacles alone will be calculated, along with a multiplicity adjusted two sided P-value and confidence interval.
Proportion of participants who achieve Binary distance visual acuity outcomes
The proportion of participants who achieve the following binary outcomes will be tabulated by treatment group to aid in the interpretation of the primary outcome: * The proportion of participants with outcome amblyopic-eye distance VA improvement of ≥ 2 logMAR lines (≥ 10 letters if E-ETDRS) from baseline. * The proportion of participants with stable resolved VA. Poisson regression with the log link will be used to estimate the relative risk of each outcome for the sequential versus simultaneous and a multiplicity adjusted two sided P-value and confidence interval. The Poisson models will include an adjustment for baseline amblyopic eye VA. In the event the number of outcomes is too small for reliable estimation with Poisson regression,43 a treatment group difference and 95% confidence interval will be estimated using the Farrington-Manning Score test or other exact method with no adjustment for baseline VA.
Time to Stable Resolved Amblyopia
For those participants who are classified as "stable resolved," the time from baseline to the time meeting that classification will be compared between treatment groups, using a Kaplan-Meier analysis with the logrank test. Multiplicity adjusted two sided P-values and confidence intervals will be produced.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Jaeb Center for Health Research
Lead sponsor
National Eye Institute (NEI)
Collaborator
Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group
Collaborator