A Study Comparing AZD0120, a Dual-targeted CAR-T Against B-cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA) and CD19, Versus Standard Regimens in Participants With Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma (DURGA-4)

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 3
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorAstraZeneca

About this trial

This is a randomised, multicentre, controlled, open-label, Phase III global study comparing the efficacy and safety of AZD0120 versus standard regimens (DKd \[daratumumab, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone\], DPd \[daratumumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone\], PVd \[pomalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone\], or Kd \[carfilzomib and dexamethasone\]) in participants with RRMM.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age ≥ 18 years

Documented diagnosis of multiple myeloma according to the IMWG diagnostic criteria

Serum M-protein level ≥ 1 g/dL

Urine M-protein level ≥ 200 mg/24h

Disqualifiers

Known active, or prior history of CNS involvement or exhibits clinical signs of meningeal involvement of MM.

Primary amyloidosis, active plasma cell leukaemia, Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia or Polyneuropathy Organomegaly Endocrinopathy M-protein and Skin (POEMS) syndrome.

Participants with primary refractory MM (failed to generate at least a minimal response to any prior therapy)

Significant neurological or psychiatric condition

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • AZD0120

    Biological/Vaccine

    CAR-T Cells

  • Daratumumab

    Drug

    Daratumumab

  • Carfilzomib

    Drug

    Carfilzomib

  • Dexamethasone

    Drug

    Dexamethasone

  • Bortezomib

    Drug

    Bortezomib

  • Pomalidomide

    Drug

    Pomalidomides

Treatment groups

508 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Arm AExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Arm BActive comparator 5 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

To demonstrate the superiority of AZD0120 relative to standard therapy (DKd, DPd, PVd, or Kd) by assessment of PFS in participants with RRMM.

PFS: defined as time from randomisation until progression according to IMWG 2016 criteria as assessed by BICR, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first.

Time frame
3 years
2

To demonstrate the superiority of AZD0120 relative to standard therapy (DKd, DPd, PVd, or Kd) by assessment of MRD negativity rate at 9 months in participants with RRMM.

MRD negative CR rate at 9 months: defined as the proportion of participants with MRD negative status and have a response of CR or sCR (according to the IMWG 2016 criteria) at 9 months (± 3 months) from randomisation before initiation of subsequent anti-myeloma therapy.

Time frame
2 years

Secondary outcomes

1

To further demonstrate the effectiveness of AZD0120 relative to standard therapy (DKd, DPd, PVd, or Kd) by assessment of CRR in participants with RRMM.

Time frame
2 years
2

To further demonstrate the effectiveness of AZD0120 relative to standard therapy (DKd, DPd, PVd, or Kd) by assessment of ORR in participants with RRMM.

Time frame
2 years
3

To further demonstrate the effectiveness of AZD0120 relative to standard therapy (DKd, DPd, PVd, or Kd) by assessment of OS in participants with RRMM.

Time frame
5 years

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.