A Study Comparing the Combination of Pembrolizumab and Sacituzumab Govitecan-hziy Versus Standard of Care in the Treatment of Advanced Urothelial Cancer

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 3
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)

About this trial

This phase III trial compares the effectiveness of pembrolizumab and sacituzumab govitecan-hziy to standard of care in treating patients with urothelial cancer that has spread to nearby tissue or lymph nodes (locally advanced) or that has spread to other places in the body (metastatic). Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as pembrolizumab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Sacituzumab govitecan-hziy is a monoclonal antibody, called sacituzumab, linked to a chemotherapy drug called govitecan-hziy. Sacituzumab attaches to TROP2 positive tumor cells in a targeted way and delivers govitecan-hziy to kill them. The usual treatment approach is treatment with chemotherapy such as cisplatin, carboplatin, gemcitabine, docetaxel or paclitaxel. Cisplatin is in a class of medications known as platinum-containing compounds. It works by killing, stopping or slowing the growth of tumor cells. Carboplatin is in a class of medications known as platinum-containing compounds. It works in a way similar to the anticancer drug cisplatin, but may be better tolerated than cisplatin. Carboplatin works by killing, stopping or slowing the growth of tumor cells. Gemcitabine is a chemotherapy drug that blocks the cells from making deoxyribonucleic acid and may kill tumor cells. Docetaxel is in a class of medications called taxanes. It stops tumor cells from growing and dividing and may kill them. Paclitaxel is in a class of medications called antimicrotubule agents. It stops tumor cells from growing and dividing and may kill them. Giving pembrolizumab and sacituzumab govitecan-hziy may be more effective than usual care of carboplatin or cisplatin with gemcitabine, docetaxel or paclitaxel in treating patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patient must be ≥ 18 years of age

Patient must have Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2.

Patient must have locally advanced (unresectable and/or not amenable to curative intent therapy) or metastatic urothelial cancer

Patient must have histologically proven conventional urothelial carcinoma (UC) of any urinary tract origin [any histologic subtype except neuroendocrine (small or large cell)] are permitted so long as tumors include ≥ 1% conventional urothelial histology). NOTE: Pure non-urothelial histology is excluded

Disqualifiers

None

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Biospecimen Collection

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo blood sample collection

  • Carboplatin

    Drug

    Given IV

  • Cisplatin

    Drug

    Given IV

  • Computed Tomography

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo CT

  • Docetaxel

    Drug

    Given IV

  • Gemcitabine

    Drug

    Given IV

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo MRI

  • Paclitaxel

    Drug

    Given IV

  • Pembrolizumab

    Biological/Vaccine

    Given IV

  • Questionnaire Administration

    Other intervention

    Ancillary studies

  • Sacituzumab Govitecan

    Biological/Vaccine

    Given IV

Treatment groups

320 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Arm I (TPC chemotherapy)Active comparator 9 interventions
Group B: Arm II (pembrolizumab, sacituzumab govitecan-hziy)Experimental treatment 6 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Overall survival (OS)

OS will be characterized with the method of Kaplan-Meier and will be compared between the two treatment arms using stratified log-rank test. The hazard ratio (HR) will be estimated, and a 95% confidence interval (CI) will be reported.

Time frame
From randomization to death due to any cause, assessed up to 5 years

Secondary outcomes

1

Progression-free survival (PFS)

PFS will be assessed per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version (v) 1.1. PFS will be characterized with the method of Kaplan-Meier and will be compared between the two treatment arms using stratified log-rank test. The HR will be estimated, and a 95% CI will be reported.

Time frame
From randomization to the earlier progression or death due to any cause, assessed up to 5 years
2

Overall response rate (ORR)

ORR will be assessed among patients who received at least one dose of protocol therapy using RECIST v 1.1 criteria. ORR will be defined as the number of patients with complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) divided by the number of treated patients. ORR will be calculated based on the definition by arm and will be reported with 95% CI.

Time frame
Up to 5 years
3

Clinical benefit rate (CBR)

CBR will be defined as CR, PR, or stable disease per RECIST v 1.1. CBR will be calculated based on the definition by arm and will be reported with 95% CI.

Time frame
Up to 5 years
4

Duration of response (DOR)

DOR will be assessed by RECIST v1.1. DOR will be characterized with the method of Kaplan-Meier and will be compared between the two treatment arms using stratified log-rank test. The HR will be estimated, and a 95% CI will be reported.

Time frame
From the first occurrence of a documented objective response to disease progression or death, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 5 years

Other outcomes

1

Change in National Comprehensive Cancer Network/Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Bladder Symptom Index-18 (FBISI-18) summary score

Change in patient reported FBISI-18 score will be compared between arms using a two-sample t-test. Assessment time will be considered as a continuous variable if there is a linear trend in quality of life (QOL) assessments over time or a set of dummy variables if a non-linear trend exists. Patient demographics and disease characteristics will be adjusted in the mixed effect model. A t-test will be performed to explore change of FBISI-18 summary score.

Time frame
At baseline and at 3, 6 and 12 months
2

Change in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) summary score

Change in patient reported FACIT-F score will be compared between arms using a two-sample t-test. Mixed effect models will be constructed to estimate the time profile of FACIT-F in the two arms and to evaluate treatment-by-time interactions. Assessment time will be considered as a continuous variable if there is a linear trend in QOL assessments over time or a set of dummy variables if a non-linear trend exists. Patient demographics and disease characteristics will be adjusted in the mixed effect model.

Time frame
At baseline and at 3, 6 and 12 months
3

Change in quality-adjusted survival (assessed by the European Quality of Life Five Dimension Five Level scale [EQ-5D-5L]).

Change in patient reported EQ-5D-5L will be compared between the arms using a two-sample t-test. Quality-adjusted survival (assessed by the EQ-5D-5L), will be analyzed with quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity.

Time frame
At baseline and at 3, 6 and 12 months

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.