A Study of the Drugs Selumetinib vs. Carboplatin and Vincristine in Patients With Low-Grade Glioma

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 3
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age2-21
SponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)

About this trial

This phase III trial compares the effect of selumetinib versus the standard of care treatment with carboplatin and vincristine (CV) in treating patients with newly diagnosed or previously untreated low-grade glioma (LGG) that does not have a genetic abnormality called BRAFV600E mutation and is not associated with systemic neurofibromatosis type 1. Selumetinib works by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth and may kill tumor cells. Carboplatin is in a class of medications known as platinum-containing compounds. It works in a way similar to the anticancer drug cisplatin, but may be better tolerated than cisplatin. Carboplatin works by killing, stopping or slowing the growth of tumor cells. Vincristine is in a class of medications called vinca alkaloids. It works by stopping tumor cells from growing and dividing and may kill them. The overall goal of this study is to see if selumetinib works just as well as the standard treatment of CV for patients with LGG. Another goal of this study is to compare the effects of selumetinib versus CV in subjects with LGG to find out which is better. Additionally, this trial will also examine if treatment with selumetinib improves the quality of life for subjects who take it.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients must be >= 2 years and =< 21 years at the time of enrollment

Patients must have a body surface area (BSA) of >= 0.5 m² at enrollment

Patients must have non-neurofibromatosis type 1 (non-NF1) low-grade glioma (LGG) without a BRAFV600E mutation as confirmed by Rapid Central Pathology and Molecular Screening Reviews performed on APEC14B1 (NCT02402244) Childhood Cancer Data Initiative (CCDI)-MCI, or accepted Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act (CLIA)-certified test and that has not been treated with any modality besides surgery. Note: Patients may be newly-diagnosed OR previously diagnosed, and there is no required time frame between biopsy/surgery and treatment initiation.

Patients with residual tumor after resection or progressive tumor after initial diagnosis (with or without surgery) who have not received treatment (chemotherapy and/or radiation) are eligible

Disqualifiers

Patients must not have received any prior tumor-directed therapy including chemotherapy, radiation therapy, immunotherapy, or bone marrow transplant. Prior surgical intervention (with the exclusion of laser interstitial thermal therapy [LITT]) is permitted

Patients with a concurrent malignancy or history of treatment (other than surgery) for another tumor within the last year are ineligible

Patients with diffuse intrinsic pontine tumors as seen on MRI (> 2/3 of pons involvement on imaging) are not eligible even if biopsy reveals grade I/II histology

Patients may not be receiving any other investigational agents

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Biospecimen Collection

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo blood sample collection

  • Carboplatin

    Drug

    Given IV

  • Echocardiography Test

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo ECHO

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo MRI

  • Questionnaire Administration

    Other intervention

    Ancillary studies

  • Selumetinib Sulfate

    Drug

    Given PO

  • Vincristine Sulfate

    Drug

    Given IV

Treatment groups

170 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Arm I (vincristine sulfate, carboplatin)Active comparator 5 interventions
Group B: Arm II (selumetinib sulfate)Experimental treatment 5 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Event-free survival (EFS)

The Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate EFS which is defined as the interval from randomization to first occurrence of clinical or radiographic disease progression, disease recurrence, second malignant neoplasm, or death from any cause, or to the date of last follow-up. Estimates with 95% confidence intervals will be reported by treatment arm. The hazard ratio with a confidence interval will also be reported to compare treatment arms based on a Cox proportional hazards model stratified by BRAF status, tumor location and size of residual tumor. Will also provide outcome estimates and their associated confidence intervals by sex, race and ethnicity, as descriptive summaries of outcome.

Time frame
Up to 10 years from date of randomization

Secondary outcomes

1

Radiographic tumor response rate

Percentages of patients with responses (complete or partial response) will be reported by treatment arm with 95% confidence intervals. The result of an exact binomial test to test for the difference in response rates between treatment arm will also be reported. Will also provide outcome estimates and their associated confidence intervals by sex, race and ethnicity, as descriptive summaries of outcome.

Time frame
Up to 10 years
2

Overall survival (OS)

The Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate OS by treatment arm, defined as the interval from randomization to death from any cause, or to the date of last follow-up. Estimates with confidence intervals will be reported by treatment arm. Will also provide outcome estimates and their associated confidence intervals by sex, race and ethnicity, as descriptive summaries of outcome.

Time frame
Up to 10 years from date of randomization
3

Number of patients who experience an improvement in visual acuity (VA)

Numbers of patients that show improvement in VA after 12 months of treatment will be reported by treatment arm. Patients with at least 1 impaired eye are evaluable. In a patient with a unilateral optic nerve glioma, only the affected eye is considered. In patients with bilateral visual impairment, if VA improves in 1 eye but worsens in the other, the patient will be coded as a treatment failure, whereas if 1 eye improves and the other is at least stable, the patient will be coded as a success.

Time frame
After the first 12 months of treatment
4

Change in motor function

Motor function is measured using the Vineland-3 Motor Scale. Only patients with motor function deficits at baseline are included. Magnitudes of change from baseline between the 2 treatment arms and provide a 90% 2-sided confidence interval for this difference.

Time frame
After 48 weeks of therapy

Other outcomes

1

Change in QOL scores over time

QOL scores for each domain of the PedsQL Generic module will be summarized by timepoint (4 timepoints) and treatment arm. Mean QOL scores will be reported with standard deviations. If scores do not follow normal distributions, medians and ranges will be reported instead.

Time frame
At baseline, 9 months, 30 months, and 60 months after treatment initiation
2

Change in neurocognitive functioning scores over time

Neurocognitive functioning scores for each index/scale of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Second Edition/Preschool Version/Adult will be summarized by timepoint (4 timepoints) and treatment arm. Mean scores will be reported with standard deviations. If scores do not follow normal distributions, medians and ranges will be reported instead.

Time frame
At baseline, 9 months, 30 months, and 60 months after treatment initiation
3

EFS by sex

Estimates of treatment effect and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals will be provided by sex.

Time frame
Up to 10 years from date of randomization
4

EFS by race

Estimates of treatment effect and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals will be provided by race.

Time frame
Up to 10 years from date of randomization

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.