A Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Empasiprubart Versus IVIg in Adults With CIDP

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 3
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
Sponsorargenx

About this trial

The main purpose of this study is to compare empasiprubart and IVIg for treating people with CIDP. This study consists of a Part A where participants will either receive empasiprubart and a placebo resembling IVIg, or IVIg and a placebo resembling empasiprubart for 24 weeks (6 months). Following Part A, participants will enter Part B in which all participants will receive empasiprubart for 96 weeks (24 months).

More information can be found here: https://clinicaltrials.argenx.com/emvigorate

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Meets criteria for CIDP based on EAN/PNS Task Force CIDP guidelines, second revision (2021)

Has either typical CIDP or 1 of the following CIDP variants: motor CIDP, multifocal CIDP (also known as Lewis-Sumner syndrome), focal CIDP, or distal CIDP

Has responded to IVIg in the past 5 years

Receiving treatment with IVIg within a standard optimal maintenance dosing regimen, with a minimum weekly IVIg dose of at least 0.125 g/kg

Disqualifiers

Besides the indication under study, known autoimmune disease or any medical condition that would interfere with an accurate assessment of clinical symptoms of CIDP or puts the participant at undue risk, including polyneuropathy of other causes

Meets the criteria for possible or sensory CIDP based on EAN/PNS Task Force CIDP guidelines, second revision (2021)

Use of other long-acting immunomodulatory treatment

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • empasiprubart

    Biological/Vaccine

    Intravenous infusion of empasiprubart

  • IVIg

    Biological/Vaccine

    Intravenous infusion of IVIg

  • empasiprubart-placebo

    Other intervention

    A placebo resembling the empasiprubart treatment

  • IVIg-placebo

    Other intervention

    A placebo resembling the IVIg treatment

Treatment groups

218 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: Part A - empasiprubart + IVIg-placeboExperimental treatment 2 interventions
Group B: Part A - IVIg + empasiprubart-placeboActive comparator 2 interventions
Group C: Part B - empasiprubartExperimental treatment 2 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Reduction of ≥1 point compared with baseline in aINCAT score at week 24

The Adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment Disability Score (aINCAT) score is a 10-point scale that covers the functionality of legs and arms. The score varies between 0 and 10 (higher score, worse outcome).

Time frame
up to 24 weeks

Secondary outcomes

1

Change from baseline in I-RODS centile points score at week 24

Inflammatory Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (I-RODS) assesses the limitations of activities and social participation in patients with inflammatory neuropathies like CIDP. The score ranges from 0 to 100 (higher score, worse outcome).

Time frame
up to 24 weeks
2

Change from baseline in MRC-SS at week 24

The Medical Research Council Sum Score evaluates motor strength. Evaluated on 6 muscle groups on each side, the score varies from 0 to 60 (lower score, worse outcome).

Time frame
up to 24 weeks
3

Change from baseline in grip strength (3-day moving average) in the dominant hand at week 24

The grip strength will be measured daily by using a Martin-Vigorimeter. The 3 daily measurements of grip strength from the left hand and the 3 daily measurements of grip strength from the right hand will be recorded, and the daily average for the left hand and right hand will be calculated, respectively. The 3-day moving average will be generated based on the average of the obtained averages for each hand on the target day and the preceding 2 days.

Time frame
up to 24 weeks
4

Time to reduction of ≥1 point from baseline in aINCAT score

The Adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment Disability Score (aINCAT) score is a 10-point scale that covers the functionality of legs and arms. The score varies between 0 and 10 (higher score, worse outcome).

Time frame
up to 24 weeks

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.