A Study to Compare Standard Chemotherapy to Therapy With CPX-351 and/or Gilteritinib for Patients With Newly Diagnosed AML With or Without FLT3 Mutations

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 3
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age6-21
SponsorChildren's Oncology Group

About this trial

This phase III trial compares standard chemotherapy to therapy with liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine (CPX-351) and/or gilteritinib for patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia with or without FLT3 mutations. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as daunorubicin, cytarabine, and gemtuzumab ozogamicin, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. CPX-351 is made up of daunorubicin and cytarabine and is made in a way that makes the drugs stay in the bone marrow longer and could be less likely to cause heart problems than traditional anthracycline drugs, a common class of chemotherapy drug. Some acute myeloid leukemia patients have an abnormality in the structure of a gene called FLT3. Genes are pieces of DNA (molecules that carry instructions for development, functioning, growth and reproduction) inside each cell that tell the cell what to do and when to grow and divide. FLT3 plays an important role in the normal making of blood cells. This gene can have permanent changes that cause it to function abnormally by making cancer cells grow. Gilteritinib may block the abnormal function of the FLT3 gene that makes cancer cells grow. The overall goals of this study are, 1) to compare the effects, good and/or bad, of CPX-351 with daunorubicin and cytarabine on people with newly diagnosed AML to find out which is better, 2) to study the effects, good and/or bad, of adding gilteritinib to AML therapy for patients with high amounts of FLT3/ITD or other FLT3 mutations and 3) to study changes in heart function during and after treatment for AML. Giving CPX-351 and/or gilteritinib with standard chemotherapy may work better in treating patients with acute myeloid leukemia compared to standard chemotherapy alone.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

All patients must be enrolled on APEC14B1 and consented to Eligibility Screening (Part A) prior to enrollment and treatment on AAML1831. Bone marrow and/or blood must have been submitted to the BPC via APEC14B1 for testing of FLT3 markers. Patients without samples submitted for FLT3 testing are not eligible

Patients must be at least 6 months of age and less than 22 years of age at the time of study enrollment

Patient must be newly diagnosed with de novo AML according to the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification with or without extramedullary disease

>= 20% bone marrow blasts (obtained within 14 days prior to enrollment)

Disqualifiers

Fanconi anemia

Shwachman Diamond syndrome

Patients with constitutional trisomy 21 or with constitutional mosaicism of trisomy 21

Telomere disorders

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo allogeneic HSCT

  • Asparaginase Erwinia chrysanthemi

    Drug

    Given IM or IV

  • Biospecimen Collection

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo blood sample collection

  • Bone Marrow Aspiration

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo BM aspiration

  • Bone Marrow Biopsy

    Procedure/Surgery

    BM biopsy

  • Computed Tomography

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo CT

  • Cytarabine

    Drug

    Given IV or IT

  • Daunorubicin Hydrochloride

    Drug

    Given IV

  • Dexrazoxane Hydrochloride

    Drug

    Given IV

  • Etoposide

    Drug

    Given IV

  • Fludeoxyglucose F-18

    Other intervention

    Undergo FDG-PET

  • Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin

    Drug

    Given IV

  • Gilteritinib Fumarate

    Drug

    Given PO/NG/G-tube

  • Liposome-encapsulated Daunorubicin-Cytarabine

    Drug

    Given IV

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo MRI

  • Methotrexate

    Drug

    Given IT

  • Mitoxantrone Hydrochloride

    Drug

    Given IV

  • Positron Emission Tomography

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo FDG-PET

  • Questionnaire Administration

    Other intervention

    Ancillary studies

  • Therapeutic Hydrocortisone

    Drug

    Given IT

Treatment groups

1,400 Participants
are divided into 14 treatment groups

14

Treatment groups

See each treatment group below.

Group A: Arm A High Risk GroupExperimental treatment 16 interventions
Group B: Arm A Low Risk Group 1Experimental treatment 16 interventions
Group C: Arm A Low Risk Group 2Experimental treatment 17 interventions
Group D: Arm AC High Risk GroupExperimental treatment 17 interventions
Group E: Arm AC Low Risk Group 2Experimental treatment 18 interventions
Group F: Arm AD High Risk GroupExperimental treatment 17 interventions
Group G: Arm AD Low Risk Group 2Experimental treatment 18 interventions
Group H: Arm B High Risk GroupExperimental treatment 15 interventions
Group I: Arm B Low Risk Group 1Experimental treatment 15 interventions
Group J: Arm B Low Risk Group 2Experimental treatment 15 interventions
Group K: Arm BC High Risk GroupExperimental treatment 16 interventions
Group L: Arm BC Low Risk Group 2Experimental treatment 18 interventions
Group M: Arm BD High Risk GroupExperimental treatment 16 interventions
Group N: Arm BD Low Risk Group 2Experimental treatment 18 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Event-free survival (EFS)

The Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate 3-year EFS, defined as the time from study entry until induction failure, relapse, or death.

Time frame
Up to 3 years

Secondary outcomes

1

Overall survival (OS)

The Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate 3-year OS, defined as the time from study entry until death.

Time frame
Up to 3 years
2

Proportion of patients positive for minimal residual disease (MRD+)

The proportion of patients MRD+ at end of induction 1 (EOI1) will be estimated as the number of patients MRD+ divided by the number of patients with evaluable EOI1 MRD results along with a corresponding 95% confidence interval determined using a binomial exact method.

Time frame
Up to 4 weeks
3

Proportion of patients who died during protocol therapy

The proportion of patients who died during protocol therapy will be estimated along with the corresponding 95% confidence interval determined using a binomial exact method.

Time frame
Up to 2 years
4

Incidence of adverse events

The proportion of patients experiencing at least one grade 3 or higher non-hematologic toxicity and infection while on protocol therapy will be estimated along with the corresponding 95% confidence interval determined using a binomial exact method. Toxicity will be assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.

Time frame
Up to 2 years

Other outcomes

1

Course duration

Median and range of the length of course duration will be determined.

Time frame
Up to 2 years
2

Length of hospitalization

Median and range of the length of hospitalization time during protocol therapy will be determined.

Time frame
Up to 2 years
3

Time to count recovery

Cumulative incidence estimates that account for competing events will be used to estimate time to count recovery in days where deaths are competing events.

Time frame
Up to 2 years
4

EFS by sex

National Institutes of Health (NIH)-required analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate 3-year EFS by sex. EFS is defined as the time from study entry until induction failure, relapse, or death.

Time frame
Up to 3 years

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Children's Oncology Group

Lead sponsor

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Collaborator