Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (Anti-VEGF) Monotherapy vs Anti-VEGF Followed by Subthreshold Micropulse Laser for Treating Severe Diabetic Macular Oedema When the Central Retina Goes <400 Microns

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 3
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorBelfast Health and Social Care Trust

About this trial

The macula is the centre of the retina; it gives central sight, colour and fine detail. People with diabetes may develop diabetic macular oedema (DMO). In DMO, fluid leaks from blood vessels and builds up at the macula, causing sight loss. DMO can be mild or severe; this is determined by measuring, in microns (µm), how thick the macula is. One µm is one-thousandth of a millimetre. People presenting with mild DMO (macula less than 400 µm thick; normally it is around 250 µm but varies with sex and ethnicity) are offered macular laser treatment. Laser works well for these patients. Subthreshold micropulse laser (SML), which does not damage the macula, works as well as standard laser, which produces a burn, and is cost-effective. However, many people present with severe DMO (macula 400 µm or thicker) where the laser does not work well. The standard treatment is eye injections of anti-VEGFs. VEGF stands for vascular endothelial growth factor. VEGF is high in eyes with DMO and causes blood vessel leakage. Anti-VEGFs block VEGF. They are given monthly to begin with, then every 2-3 months for months or years until DMO clears. In many patients DMO comes back after clearing and anti-VEGFs need to be re-started most often monthly initially again. To improve the care of people with severe DMO this study will compare the current standard care (anti-VEGFs alone) with a strategy in which patients begin with an anti-VEGF but switch to SML once the macula is less than 400 µm thick.

Patients aged over 18 years with type 1 or type 2 diabetes and severe DMO can participate. They are randomly allocated either anti-VEGFs alone or anti-VEGFs then SML when the macula is less than 400 µm thick.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Adults (>18 years)

Diabetes type 1 or type 2

Presented with severe centre-involving (CI)-DMO (CRT ≥400 μm)

Within the first year of initiating anti-VEGF therapy but who still have DMO and their CRT is below 400 μm (and it remains, at the time of randomisation) following anti-VEGF therapy in either one eye or both eyes

Disqualifiers

Causes of macular oedema other than DMO

DMO with CRT ≥400 μm

Receipt of anti-VEGFs before their presentation with severe DMO (previous macular laser treatment for DMO is allowed)

Use of unlicensed anti-VEGFs (e.g. bevacizumab)

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Subthreshold Micropulse Laser (SML)

    Procedure/Surgery

    SML will be applied in line with the DAME Guideline and follow the DAME participant pathway.

  • Anti-VEGF Monotherapy (standard care)

    Drug

    Anti-VEGFs including ranibizumab and biosimilars, aflibercept, faricimab, and brolucizumab will be used, as per the standard of care at participating sites. The anti-VEGF should be administered in line with the summary of product characteristics (SmPC).

Treatment groups

264 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Subthreshold Micropulse Laser (SML)Active comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Anti-VEGF Monotherapy (standard care)Active comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)

Change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in the study eye from randomisation (baseline) to 104 weeks (24 months) (equivalence margin +/- 5 ETDRS letters)

Time frame
104 weeks after randomisation

Secondary outcomes

1

Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) in the study eye

CRT in the central 1 mm of the retina as measured using Spectral-Domain optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)

Time frame
104 weeks after randomisation
2

Health-related and vision-related quality of life

National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ) 25 and the EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ 5D 5L) questionnairewill be used. NEI VFQ-25 evaluates visual outcomes in participants with eye diseases. It elicits information about general health and vision, as well as difficulty with near vision, distance vision, driving and the the effect of light conditions on vision. It is used to produce a composite score between 0-100. Higher scores represent better functioning. EQ-5D-5L is a generic preference-based measure of health, providing a description of health using 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression) each with 5 levels of severity. Responses can be converted to an overall utility score and used to calculate QALYs. Respondents are also asked to place their health on a visual analogue scale where 0 represents the worst imaginable health state and 100 the best imaginable health state.

Time frame
104 weeks after randomisation
3

Safety of procedures

Based on determined safety outcomes, adverse events, and serious adverse events

Time frame
By 104 weeks after randomisation
4

Treatments used in the study eye

Number of treatments (anti-VEGF injections, SML sessions) used in the study eye

Time frame
By 104 weeks after randomisation

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Belfast Health and Social Care Trust

Lead sponsor

Queen's University, Belfast

Collaborator