About this trial
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is characterized by difficulties paying attention, poor impulse control, and hyperactive behaviors. It is associated with several health and social detrimental outcomes and leads to increased risks of criminality and recidivism. However, to date, ADHD treatment has been neglected in prison. This project will test the efficacy of ADHD treatment using a randomized controlled trial.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
age between 18 and 65
good command of French
stay in prison approx. 4 months at eligibility visit
endorsing clinical diagnostic criteria for DSM-5 ADHD
Disqualifiers
presence of an acute uncontrolled comorbid psychiatric disorder
medical contraindication to stimulant prescription
potential adverse interaction with another medication
already receive ADHD treatment
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Concerta
DrugDosages of Concerta® will be defined according to the Swiss Compendium (from 18 to 72 mg/d). The psychiatrist will start with the smallest dosage (18 mg) and will adapt it on a weekly basis or on need, depending on tolerance (side effects measured at each visit), clinical response (subjective improvement felt by the patient in terms of attention, impulsivity, and hyperactivity), and according to the observations made by the professionals or patient's entourage in term of attention, impulsivity, hyperactivity, and for this project, behavioral problems. In general, the dose can be increased in 18 mg at weekly intervals. The treatment will be monitored weekly the first month, and then monthly, except for side effects which will be monitored daily in prison and every two weeks after release.
Placebo
DrugThe placebo will be strictly identical (same packaging, size no. 2 and color according to dosage, with no label). Procedure for adjustment of dosage will be the same as in the Concerta arm.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Severity of ADHD core symptoms
Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scale, range 0-78, higher score indicates worse outcome
Secondary outcomes
Number of acute events
Refusal to see doctors, nurses or lawyers, hunger strikes, self-harm events requiring a visit to the medical unit, fights requiring a visit to the medical unit, and disciplinary sanctions
Score of risk of recidivism
Dynamic risk assessment tool will be used to evaluate the risk of recidivism, score 0-30, higher score indicates better outcome
Percentage of adherence to medication
Binary variable (yes=adherence to medication, no=absence of adherence to medication)
Percentage of retention to study
Binary variable (yes=remain in the study, no=dropout from the study)
Other outcomes
Number of side effects
Side effects according to the Swiss compendium (number of side effects)
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Stéphanie Baggio
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Geneva
Sponsor institution
University of Lausanne
Collaborator
University of Geneva, Switzerland
Collaborator
Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement
Collaborator
School of Health Sciences Fribourg
Collaborator