About this trial
This phase III trial compares the effect of adding chemotherapy to immunotherapy (pembrolizumab) versus immunotherapy alone in treating patients with stage IIIB-IV lung cancer. Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as pembrolizumab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Chemotherapy drugs work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Giving pembrolizumab and chemotherapy may help stabilize lung cancer.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
STEP 1 REGISTRATION
Patient must be ≥ 70 years of age
Patient must have histologically or cytologically confirmed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) range of 1-49%
Patient must have Stage IIIB, IIIC or IV disease and not be candidates for combined chemo-radiation. NOTE: Prior chemo-radiation therapy (RT) for stage III with recurrence is allowed
Disqualifiers
None
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Carboplatin
DrugGiven IV
Computed Tomography
Procedure/SurgeryUndergo CT scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Procedure/SurgeryUndergo MRI
Nab-paclitaxel
DrugGiven IV
Paclitaxel
DrugGiven IV
Pembrolizumab
Biological/VaccineGiven IV
Pemetrexed
DrugGiven IV
Positron Emission Tomography
Procedure/SurgeryUndergo PET
Questionnaire Administration
Other interventionAncillary studies
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Overall survival (OS)
Will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox proportional hazards models will be used to estimate hazard ratios. Comparison of OS will use a logrank test stratified on the randomization stratification factors with a one-sided type I error rate of 0.025. Other comparisons of groups will be made using the log rank test and Cox modeling.
Secondary outcomes
Progression free survival (PFS)
Will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox proportional hazards models will be used to estimate hazard ratios.
Six month PFS
Defined as the proportion of patients who remained alive and progression-free at 6 months. Will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox proportional hazards models will be used to estimate hazard ratios.
Best objective response
Will be evaluated via RECIST 1.1 criteria. Best objective response rate is defined as the proportion of patients with measurable disease at baseline achieved complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as best response from the start of the treatment until disease progression/recurrence or start of non-protocol therapy. Patients who do not start treatment and patients who do not have any follow-up disease evaluation and do not meet RECIST criteria for clinical progression are coded as not evaluable. Patients who are not evaluable are included in the calculation of response rates (as non-responders).
Incidence of adverse events
Toxicity will be determined using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Toxicity will be assessed by summaries by CTCAE grade.
Other outcomes
Gut microbe abundances
Will relate gut microbe abundances to treatment outcomes, toxicity, and geriatric assessments.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.