Comparative Effectiveness Between Indomethacin and Pancreatic Stenting in the Prevention of Post ERCP Pancreatitis

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 3
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-99
SponsorChinese University of Hong Kong

About this trial

Post ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) occurs in 4 to 5% of patients and is associated with significant morbidities and occasional mortalities. The use of rectall administered indomethacin and pancreatic duct stent (PDS) placement have independently been proven to reduce PEP. The comparative effectiveness of the two methods has however not been studied. It is argued that in the context of indomethacin, the placement of a PDS is unnecessary. Advocates for PDS insertion however believe that mechanical decompression of the pancreatic duct is critical in the prevention of pancreatitis. The investigators propose a multi-centre randomised controlled trial to compare the use of rectal indomethacin to PDS insertion in high risk patients in the prevention of PEP.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

sphincter of Oddi dysfunction

history of PEP, pancreatic instrumentation or sphincterotomy, precut sphincterotomy,

difficult cannulation defined by >5 cannulation attempts

the use of double wire technique in bile duct access

Disqualifiers

patients intended for pancreatic stenting e.g. those with pancreatic duct strictures, ampullectomy,

without informed consents from patient or next of kin

age <18

pregnant or lactating women

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • pancreatic stenting

    Device

    a PD stent to be inserted during ERCP (a 3 to 5 cm 5Fr single pigtail pancreatic duct stent without inner flap is used, the stent is inserted after deep cannulation of pancreatic duct with a .025" or .035" wire)

  • Indomethacin

    Drug

    rectally administered indomethacin before or after ERCP

Treatment groups

1,734 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: indomethacinExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: pancreatic stentingExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group C: indomethacin plus pancreatic stentingExperimental treatment 2 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

post-ERCP pancreatitis

Percentage of Participants with post ERCP pancreatitis

Time frame
30 days
2

high severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis

Percentage of Participants with high severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis using the Clavian-Dindo classification (1 / 2 / 3 / 3a / 3b / 4 / 4a/ 4b / 5)

Time frame
30 days
3

pancreatitis with complications

Percentage of Participants with pancreatitis with complications using Atlanta classification (Mild / Moderate / Severe / Critical )

Time frame
30 days

Secondary outcomes

1

hospital stay

period of hospitalisation (days)

Time frame
30 days
2

endoscopic intervention due to PEP

Percentage of Participants with endoscopic intervention due to Post ERCP pancreatitis

Time frame
30 days
3

radiologic intervention due to PEP

Percentage of Participants with radiologic intervention due to Post ERCP pancreatitis

Time frame
30 days
4

surgery due to PEP

Percentage of Participants with Surgical intervention due to Post ERCP pancreatitis

Time frame
30 days

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Chinese University of Hong Kong

Lead sponsor

Xijing Hospital

Collaborator

Changhai Hospital

Collaborator

Tianjin Union Medical Center

Collaborator

Zhejiang University

Collaborator

Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital

Collaborator