Comparison of Azathioprine to Methotrexate in Combination Therapy With Adalimumab in Crohn's Disease: an Open-label Randomized Controlled Trial

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 3
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens

About this trial

Combination therapy, the association of an anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) to an immunosuppressant, is recognized as the most effective treatment during Crohn's disease (CD). Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain the superiority of combination therapy over monotherapy, the additive effect of two effective drugs or the prevention of anti-TNF immunogenicity. As the best combination therapy is unknown, both azathioprine (AZA) and methotrexate (MTX) are used. Some retrospective studies suggest a higher effectiveness of AZA. MTX may have an advantage in terms of safety.

The investigators hypothesize that AZA is more effective than MTX as combination therapy with adalimumab to improve short-term endoscopic, clinical and pharmacological outcomes in CD patients.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Male or female patients with age > 18 years

Crohn's disease for at least 6 weeks,

Clinically active with CDAI > 150

Active inflammation by endoscopy (CDEIS > 4) at baseline

Disqualifiers

Short bowel syndrome, ostomy, symptomatic stricture, abscess, recent history of abdominal surgery (<3 months)

Non-passable colonic stricture

Previous intolerance to thiopurines or MTX

Previous exposition to adalimumab

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • AZA capsules

    Drug

    oral AZA capsules at a daily dose of 2.5 mg per kilogram,

  • MTX

    Drug

    MTX 25 mg SC once a week

  • blood sample

    Biological/Vaccine

    The lab tests are: serum albumin, C-reactive protein, thrombocytosis and haemoglobin.

Treatment groups

166 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: AZA groupExperimental treatment 2 interventions
Group B: MTX groupExperimental treatment 2 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Variation of the endoscopic response between AZA and MTX groups

Variation of the endoscopic response to AZA in combination with adalimumab and to MTX in combination with adalimumab in patients with CD. The endoscopic reference score (EREFS) is used to determine severity of 5 endoscopic findings: edema, rings, exudates, furrows, and structures. The EREFS classification system rates the severity of edema (0-2), rings (0-3), exudates (0-2), furrows (0-2), and strictures (0-1)

Time frame
26 weeks

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens

Lead sponsor

Nantes University Hospital

Collaborator

AP-HP - HU BEAUJON

Collaborator

CHU de Reims

Collaborator

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon

Collaborator

CHRU LILLE

Collaborator

University Hospital, Bordeaux

Collaborator

Henri Mondor University Hospital

Collaborator

Hospices Civils de Lyon

Collaborator

Rennes University Hospital

Collaborator

CHU ROUEN - HOPITAL DE BOIS-GUILLAUME

Collaborator

CHRU TOURS

Collaborator

University Hospital, Toulouse

Collaborator

University Hospital, Montpellier

Collaborator

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice

Collaborator

Central Hospital, Nancy, France

Collaborator

University Hospital, Caen

Collaborator

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne

Collaborator

CH TOURCOING

Collaborator

Hopitaux Civils de Colmar

Collaborator

CH COTE BASQUE

Collaborator

CH ROUBAIX

Collaborator

CHI CRETEIL

Collaborator

CHI TOULON LA SEYNE

Collaborator

CH VALENCE

Collaborator

CMC Ambroise Paré, Pierre Cherest, Hartmann

Collaborator

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Collaborator