Comparison Partial Versus Total Omentectomy in Minimal Invasive Distal Gastrectomy for cT3/4a Gastric Cancer (KLASS-10)

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 3
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age20-85
SponsorGangnam Severance Hospital

About this trial

For advanced gastric cancer, surgical resection is the only curable therapeutic strategy. According to minimally invasive approach is adopted in various field of oncologic surgery, laparoscopic gastrectomy with lymph node dissection is becoming a standard not only for early gastric cancer but also for advanced gastric cancer.

The greater omentum is an organ is known to play a role in removing bacteria in the abdominal cavity as a primary defense. Complete resection of the greater omentum has been considered essential to ensure the elimination of micrometastasis during surgery for advanced gastric cancer. However, the oncological effect of total omentectomy is still lack of evidence. Especially in minimal invasive gastrectomy, total omentectomy procedure is known to increases the operating time, increase the risk of bleeding, colonic injury, and postoperative complications such as intra-abdominal abscess, ascites, anastomotic leakage, ileus and wound infections. Therefore, in the case of minimal invasive surgery in early gastric cancer, omentectomy is omitted usually or routinely. Partial omentectomy preserves the omentum more than 3cm away from the gastro-epiploic vessels. Advanced energy devices facilitate partial omentectomy during laparoscopic gastrectomy.

According to the Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines, partial omentectomy (omentum preservation) is feasible for T1 or T2 tumors, and total omentectomy is recommended for clinical T3 or deeper tumors. However, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network(NCCN) guideline suggests total omentectomy and the European Society for Medical Oncology(ESMO) guideline does not mentioned about it.

It is still controversial whether total omentectomy should be performed in advanced gastric cancer. Therefore, we aimed to verify the non-inferiority of partial omentectomy, oncologic safety compared with total omentectomy via multicenter randomized clinical trial.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the stomach

Age between 20 to 85 years old

ECOG PS 0-1, ASA class I-III

Endoscopically Borrmann type I, II, III

Disqualifiers

Confirmed distant metastasis in preoperative examinations

Confirmed metastasis in abdominal cavity or distant organs during surgery

Confirmed no infiltration of the serosa layer or unable to confirm the tumor location during surgery (sT1-2)

Confirmed invasion of surrounding organs (sT4b)

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Arm I (Total omentectomy),

    Procedure/Surgery

    The surgery is performed with minimal invasive surgery, and the range of the surgery is radical gastrectomy and D2 lymph node dissection. Depending on the random assignment, total omentectomy and partial omentectomy (omentum preservation) will be performed for the control group and the experimental group, respectively. Total omentectomy removes whole greater omentum, while partial omentectomy preserves the omentum more than 3cm away from the gastro-epiploic vessels. Other surgical procedures are the same as usual in both groups.

  • Arm II (Partial omentectomy)

    Procedure/Surgery

    The surgery is performed with minimal invasive surgery, and the range of the surgery is radical gastrectomy and D2 lymph node dissection. Depending on the random assignment, total omentectomy and partial omentectomy (omentum preservation) will be performed for the control group and the experimental group, respectively. Total omentectomy removes whole greater omentum, while partial omentectomy preserves the omentum more than 3cm away from the gastro-epiploic vessels. Other surgical procedures are the same as usual in both groups.

Treatment groups

440 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Total omentectomy groupActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Partial omentectomy groupExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

3-year relapse free survival

Verify the non-inferiority of partial omentectomy(omentum preservation) in 3-year relapse free survival(RFS). Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests will be used.

Time frame
3 year after surgery

Secondary outcomes

1

3-year overall survival

To compare surgical outcomes between the partial omentectomy and total omentectomy in patients with advanced gastric cancer, especially clinical T3 and T4a tumors without distant metastasis, who underwent minimal invasive radical gastrectomy and D2 lymph node dissection. Clinicopathologic features and surgical outcomes will be analyzed using an paired t-test for continuous variables and the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for nominal variables. In the survival analysis, the Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests will be used. Surgical complications will be graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.

Time frame
3 year after surgery
2

Estimated blood loss

To compare surgical outcomes between the partial omentectomy and total omentectomy in patients with advanced gastric cancer, especially clinical T3 and T4a tumors without distant metastasis, who underwent minimal invasive radical gastrectomy and D2 lymph node dissection. Clinicopathologic features and surgical outcomes will be analyzed using an paired t-test for continuous variables and the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for nominal variables. In the survival analysis, the Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests will be used. Surgical complications will be graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.

Time frame
during surgery
3

Operation time

To compare surgical outcomes between the partial omentectomy and total omentectomy in patients with advanced gastric cancer, especially clinical T3 and T4a tumors without distant metastasis, who underwent minimal invasive radical gastrectomy and D2 lymph node dissection. Clinicopathologic features and surgical outcomes will be analyzed using an paired t-test for continuous variables and the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for nominal variables. In the survival analysis, the Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests will be used. Surgical complications will be graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.

Time frame
during surgery
4

Post-operative complications (Early, and delayed complication)

To compare surgical outcomes between the partial omentectomy and total omentectomy in patients with advanced gastric cancer, especially clinical T3 and T4a tumors without distant metastasis, who underwent minimal invasive radical gastrectomy and D2 lymph node dissection. Clinicopathologic features and surgical outcomes will be analyzed using an paired t-test for continuous variables and the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for nominal variables. In the survival analysis, the Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests will be used. Surgical complications will be graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.

Time frame
1 month after surgery & 3 year after surgery ( Evaluate 2 times to analyze early complication, and delayed complication respectively)

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.