Comparison Study of EAP and Disease-Specific Chemotherapy Regimens in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization for Lymphoma

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 3
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-75
SponsorThe Affiliated People's Hospital of Ningbo University

About this trial

This study utilizes a prospective, multicenter, randomized two-arm design to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the etoposide, cytarabine, and pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) combination therapy (EAP regimen) in mobilizing hematopoietic stem cells in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). A total of 99 NHL patients will be enrolled as research subjects and will be randomly allocated in a 2:1 ratio to compare the EAP regimen versus disease-specific chemotherapy mobilization regimen. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients achieving the ideal collection value after a single collection (CD34+ cells ≥5×10\^6/kg).

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Diagnosed with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma before enrollment.

Indication for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT).

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0~1.

Achieved complete remission after multiple courses of chemotherapy.

Disqualifiers

Cardiac function class II or higher or cardiac ejection fraction < 40%.

Serum direct bilirubin (DBIL) more than twice of the upper limit of normal (ULN).

Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) more than three times the upper limit of normal (ULN).

Serum creatinine clearance rate ≤ 50%.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Etoposide

    Drug

    Day 1\~Day 2: 75mg/m\^2

  • Cytarabine

    Drug

    Day 1\~Day 2: 200g/m\^2, q12h

  • PEG-rhG-CSF

    Drug

    Day 6: 6mg

  • G-CSF

    Drug

    Starting from the 9th day, if the white blood cell count is less than 20,000/μL, administer G-CSF at a dose of 5μg/kg by subcutaneous injection until the collection is completed.

  • CHOP

    Combination product

    \[Cyclophosphamide (Cy) + Doxorubicin (ADM) + Vincristine (VDS) + Prednisone (Pred) \]± Rituximab (R)

  • Hyper-CVAD

    Combination product

    \[Cyclophosphamide + Doxorubicin + Vincristine + Dexamethasone (DXM)\] ± Rituximab

  • ID-MTX + Ara-C

    Combination product

    \[High-Dose Methotrexate (MTX) + Cytarabine\] ± Rituximab

  • DA-EPOCH

    Combination product

    \[Etoposide + Doxorubicin + Vincristine + Cyclophosphamide + Prednisone\] ± Rituximab

  • GDP

    Combination product

    \[Gemcitabine (G) + Cisplatin (P) + Dexamethasone (DXM)\] ± Rituximab

  • GDPE

    Combination product

    \[Gemcitabine + Cisplatin + Dexamethasone + Etoposide\] ± Rituximab

  • ICE

    Combination product

    \[Etoposide + Ifosfamide (IFO) + Carboplatin\] ± Rituximab

  • DICE

    Combination product

    \[Dexamethasone + Ifosfamide + Ifosfamide + Etoposide\] ± Rituximab

  • G-CSF

    Drug

    From Day 6, administer G-CSF at a dose of 5μg/kg by subcutaneous injection until the collection is completed.

Treatment groups

99 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: EAP regimen groupExperimental treatment 4 interventions
Group B: Disease-specific chemotherapy mobilization regimens groupActive comparator 9 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

% of patients achieving the collection of ≥5×10^6 CD34+ cells/kg

Proportion of patients who achieve the ideal collection value (CD34+ cells ≥5×10\^6/kg) after a single collection.

Time frame
1 month

Secondary outcomes

1

% of patients achieving the collection of ≥2×10^6 CD34+ cells/kg

To observe and compare the proportion of patients who cumulatively achieve the target collection value (CD34+ cells ≥ 2×10\^6/kg) between the EAP regimen and the disease-specific chemotherapy regimen; the proportion of patients who achieve the ideal collection value.

Time frame
1 month
2

CD34+ cells and the average number of collections

To observe and compare the total cumulative collection of CD34+ cells and the average number of collections between the EAP regimen and the disease-specific chemotherapy regimen.

Time frame
1 month
3

Adverse Rvents (AEs)

To observe and compare the hematological and non-hematological adverse reactions between the EAP regimen and the disease-specific chemotherapy regimen.

Time frame
1 month
4

% of patients who use Plerixafor

To observe and compare the proportion of patients who receive plerixafor added to the EAP regimen and the disease-specific chemotherapy regimen.

Time frame
1 month

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

The Affiliated People's Hospital of Ningbo University

Lead sponsor

First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University

Collaborator

First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University

Collaborator

Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University

Collaborator

Jinhua People's Hospital

Collaborator

The Central Hospital of Lishui City

Collaborator

Shaoxing People's Hospital

Collaborator

Shaoxing Second Hospital

Collaborator

Zhejiang Provincial Tongde Hospital

Collaborator

Taizhou Hospital

Collaborator

Dongyang People's Hospital

Collaborator

Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University

Collaborator

Huzhou Central Hospital

Collaborator

Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University

Collaborator

Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital

Collaborator

Jinhua Municipal Central Hospital

Collaborator