Dexamethasone Treatment for Sepsis-associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: a Multicenter, Randomised, Double-blinded, Controlled Trial

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 3
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
AgeNot listed
SponsorSoutheast University, China

About this trial

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a major cause of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in critically ill patients and is associated with substantial mortality. Current management is largely supportive, and no pharmacologic therapy has been shown consistently to reduce mortality in a broad population of patients with ARDS. Inflammation plays a central role in the pathogenesis of ARDS. Excessive inflammatory activation contributes to alveolar-capillary injury, impaired gas exchange, and progression of organ dysfunction. Glucocorticoids may mitigate these processes and have been associated in some studies with improved clinical outcomes, including shorter duration of mechanical ventilation. However, the effect of glucocorticoids on survival remains uncertain.

ARDS is a heterogeneous syndrome with diverse etiologies, and treatment response may vary according to the underlying cause. A post hoc analysis of the Dex-ARDS trial suggested that the treatment effect of glucocorticoids may be greater in ARDS caused by pneumonia or extrapulmonary sepsis. In a cross-sectional survey of 135 patients with ARDS from 20 ICUs in China, pneumonia- and extrapulmonary sepsis-associated ARDS accounted for 77.6% of cases, indicating that these are the predominant etiologic subtypes encountered in clinical practice in China. More importantly, compared with ARDS attributable to other causes, pneumonia- and extrapulmonary sepsis-associated ARDS has been associated with higher mortality, suggesting a greater disease burden, worse prognosis, and a more urgent need for improved treatment strategies. On this basis, the present trial will enroll patients with ARDS caused by sepsis, including pneumonia and extrapulmonary sepsis.

The primary hypothesis of this study is that, among patients with sepsis-associated ARDS, dexamethasone plus usual care, as compared with placebo plus usual care, will reduce 90-day all-cause mortality. We therefore designed a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial to evaluate the clinical efficacy of dexamethasone in patients with sepsis-associated ARDS. The primary objective is to compare dexamethasone plus usual care with placebo plus usual care with respect to 90-day all-cause mortality.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age 18 years or older

Suspected or confirmed infection

Receipt of invasive mechanical ventilation with a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of at least 5 cm H₂O, noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation with a PEEP of at least 5 cm H₂O, or high-flow nasal oxygen therapy with a flow rate of at least 30 L/min

Disqualifiers

Pregnancy

Planned withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment within the next 24 hours

Current hospitalization for more than 7 days before screening;

Clinical improvement within the 48 hours before randomization, based on the investigator's overall assessment

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Dexamethasone

    Drug

    Participants assigned to dexamethasone will receive 20 mg intravenously as soon as possible after randomization. Beginning after 10:00 am on the next calendar day following randomization, dexamethasone 20 mg will be administered once daily through day 5, followed by dexamethasone 10 mg once daily from Day 6 to Day 10.

  • Placebo

    Drug

    Participants assigned to the placebo group will receive 0.9% sodium chloride injection as matching placebo, administered according to the same schedule as dexamethasone

Treatment groups

1,704 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Dexamethasone GroupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Placebo GroupPlacebo comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

90-day all-cause mortality

The proportion of participants who die from any cause between randomization (day 0) and day 90 (inclusive)

Time frame
From randomization (day 0) to day 90 (inclusive)

Secondary outcomes

1

Ventilator-free days through day 28

The number of days from randomization (day 0) to day 28 (inclusive) during which the patient is alive and successfully liberated from invasive mechanical ventilation

Time frame
From randomization (day 0) to day 28 (inclusive)
2

Vasopressor-free days through day 28

The number of days from randomization (day 0) to day 28 (inclusive) during which the patient is alive and successfully discontinued from vasopressor therapy

Time frame
From randomization (day 0) to day 28 (inclusive)
3

Renal replacement therapy-free days through day 28

The number of days from randomization (day 0) to day 28 (inclusive) during which the patient is alive and does not require renal replacement therapy

Time frame
From randomization (day 0) to day 28 (inclusive)
4

28-day all-cause mortality

The proportion of participants who die from any cause between randomization (day 0) and day 28 (inclusive)

Time frame
From randomization (day 0) to day 28 (inclusive)

Other outcomes

1

Incidence of weaning success through day 28

For intubated patients, successful weaning was defined as survival without reintubation within 7 days after extubation, or liberation from invasive mechanical ventilation with ICU discharge within 7 days. For tracheostomized patients, successful weaning was defined as spontaneous breathing via tracheostomy without mechanical ventilation for at least 7 consecutive days, or liberation from invasive mechanical ventilation with ICU discharge within 7 days. Reintubation for diagnostic purposes (e.g., bronchoscopy) or planned surgical procedures (e.g., wound debridement, abdominal lavage, internal fixation of fractures, tracheostomy) was not considered weaning failure.

Time frame
From randomization (day 0) to day 28 (inclusive)
2

Incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding through day 28

The proportion of participants who developed acute gastrointestinal bleeding requiring transfusion of more than 1 unit of packed red blood cells within 24 hours

Time frame
From randomization (day 0) to day 28 (inclusive)
3

Incidence of secondary bloodstream infection through day 28

The proportion of participants who developed secondary bloodstream infection through day 28

Time frame
From randomization (day 0) to day 28 (inclusive)
4

Incidence of VAP through day 28

The proportion of participants who developed ventilator-associated pneumonia through day 28

Time frame
From randomization (day 0) to day 28 (inclusive)

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.