Efficacy of Diloxanide Furoate as Additional Luminal Agent Along With Metronidazole for the Treatment of Amoebic Liver Abscess

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phasePhase 3
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh

About this trial

Liver abscess is a common cause of presentation to medical emergency. Among the various causes of liver abscess, Amoebic liver abscess (ALA) is a frequent cause that can resemble pyogenic infections in tropical regions. Prompt diagnosis and empirical antimicrobials along with drainage or aspiration produces successful clinical recovery.

Metronidazole has been the cornerstone of ALA therapy and achieves clinical cure in approximately 90% of uncomplicated cases. It is active against both luminal and tissue forms of Entamoeba histolytica, however it has relatively limited effect against the intestinal (luminal) form of parasite, so intestine may remain colonized after apparent resolution. This persistent intestinal carriage can lead to relapse or ongoing transmission. This prompts physicians to consider Diloxanide furoate as additional luminal agent for treatment of ALA along with metronidazole therapy.

Diloxanide furoate is traditionally administered after metronidazole to eradicate residual intestinal infection and lower relapse rates. However, many patients receive only metronidazole because of cost, limited awareness about luminal therapy, poor adherence, or absence of local comparative evidence. Studies have shown that 30-40% of patients can have inadequate luminal parasite clearance following standard metronidazole therapy for ALA. Frequent relapses have been seen in ALA after treatment with metronidazole. As per literature, Diloxanide furoate eradicates intraluminal cysts in approximately 85-95% of patients with non-invasive amoebiasis.

It remains unclear whether giving Diloxanide furoate at the same time as Metronidazole has any additional benefit compared with Metronidazole alone for patients with ALA. Theoretically, addition of diloxanide furoate could increase overall cure rate, rapid parasite clearance and reduce recurrence.

However, there is no randomized controlled trial available at present to address the research question whether dual therapy with Diloxanide furoate with Metronidazole has any added benefits in ALA. So, this randomized controlled trial has been planned to evaluate whether adding Diloxanide furoate to Metronidazole treatment improves outcomes. This study will generate robust data to formulate/modify the existing guidelines of management of ALA especially in endemic areas.

Research question:

Whether addition of Diloxanide furoate with Metronidazole is more efficacious than Metronidazole monotherapy for treatment of amoebic liver abscess in terms of achieving better clinical cure, parasitic clearance and reduced recurrence.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age >18 years

Male or Female

Patients with newly diagnosed amoebic liver abscess

Disqualifiers

Patients not able to take orally

Patients receiving antimicrobials for more than 72 hours before the enrolment in the study

History of hypersensitivity reactions to Metronidazole or Diloxanide furoate

Pregnancy

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Diloxanide furoate

    Drug

    Diloxanide furoate group will receive oral Diloxanide furoate 500mg 1 tab TDS for 10 days

  • Placebo

    Other intervention

    matched placebo 1 tab TDS for 10 days

Treatment groups

220 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Diloxanide furoate groupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Placebo groupPlacebo comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Clinical cure

"Clinical cure" is defined as number of participants becoming asymptomatic with fever resolution for ≥48 hours, including USG demonstrating no drainable collection in the liver along with removal of the pigtail catheter if any.

Time frame
8 weeks
2

Treatment failure

"Treatment failure" is defined as the number of participants fulfilling of any one or more of the following conditions: 1. Persistently symptomatic even after 72 h of antimicrobial therapy and percutaneous aspiration or drainage of the hepatic collection 2. Emergence of new collection in the liver during the course of antimicrobial therapy 3. Emergence of shock and or new onset organ failure (Encephalopathy, ARDS, AKI, MODS) during the course of therapy e. Patients requiring persistent drainage or repeated aspiration of the abscess even after 4 weeks of antimicrobial therapy

Time frame
8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

1

1. Parasitic clearance

Number of participant's Stool EH DNA PCR becomes negative after initial positive test at 2 \& 8 weeks.

Time frame
8 weeks
2

Recurrence of liver abscess

Number of participants with occurrence of new liver abscess after achieving clinical cure during 8 weeks of follow up.

Time frame
8 weeks
3

Duration of the therapy

Number of days of antimicrobial therapy required to achieve clinical cure

Time frame
8 weeks
4

Adverse drug reaction (ADR)

Incidence of adverse drug reaction related to the ongoing antimicrobial therapy.

Time frame
8 weeks

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: