Evaluation of Iopofosine I 131 vs. R-CD in WM Patients

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phasePhase 3
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorCellectar Biosciences, Inc.

About this trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether iopofosine I 131 is more effective than the combination Rituximab-Cyclophosphamide-Dexamethasone (R-CD). The main question the study aims to answer is:

• Does iopofosine I 131 work better than R-CD when looking at the length of time during and after the treatment that a patient lives with WM but it does not get worse.

Participants will:

* Be randomly assigned to received either iopofosine I 131 or R-CD. * If assigned to iopofosine I 131, have it administered via infusion 2 times each cycle for a total of 2 cycles (each cycle is about 3 months long). * If assigned to R-CD, it will be administered for up to six cycles, and each cycle is 3-weeks long * Visit the clinic once every 3 weeks for checkups and testing. * Report any side effects or new medications.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Histologically and serologically confirmed diagnosis of WM.

Received at least one prior therapy for WM.

Received treatment with a BTKi (including covalent BTKi or non-covalent BTKi).

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0 to 2.

Disqualifiers

Anti CD-20 MoAb < 6 months prior to study drug administration.

Any conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy ≤ four weeks prior to study drug administration.

Non-anti CD20 MoAb therapy for the treatment of WM ≤ three months prior to study drug administration. i. The only exception to this is for those patients who have documented evidence of progression while receiving non-anti CD20 MoAb therapy.

BTKi therapy ≤ 48 hours prior to study drug administration.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Iopofosine I 131

    Drug

    Fractionated dose

  • Rituximab (active comparator)

    Drug

    Rituximab

  • Cyclophosphamate

    Drug

    Cyclophosphamide

  • Dexamethasone

    Drug

    Dexamethasone

Treatment groups

219 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Iopofosine I 131Experimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: R-CDActive comparator 3 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Superiority of progression free survival (PFS)

A survival analysis will be performed comparing treatment arms using the Cox Proportional Hazard model to determine the hazard ratio, corresponding 95% CI, and p-value to determine superiority between iopofosine I 131 and R-CD.

Time frame
From baseline randomization through study completion of progressive disease, or death due to any reason (whichever status is recorded first).

Secondary outcomes

1

Major response rate (MRR)

Proportion of participants with CR, VGPR, or PR determined from the modified IWWM-11 response criteria. Corresponding 95% CO using the Clopper-Pearson method will be reported.

Time frame
Day 1 of Cycle 1 of dosing through the start of new antineoplastic treatment or early termination, whichever occurs first.
2

Overall response rate (ORR)

Proportion of participants with CR, VGPR, PR, or MR determined from the modified IWWM-11 response criteria. Corresponding 95% CO using the Clopper-Pearson method will be reported.

Time frame
Day 1 of Cycle 1 of dosing until start of new antineoplastic treatment or early termination, whichever occurs first.
3

VGPR/CR rates

Proportion of participants with VGPR or CR determined from the modified IWWM-11 response criteria. The corresponding 95% CI using the Clopper-Pearson method will be reported for each treatment group

Time frame
Day 1 of Cycle 1 of dosing until the start of new antineoplastic treatment or early termination, whichever occurs first.
4

Number of adverse events related to trial medications (iopofosine I 131 or R-CD)

Adverse events are graded per NCI CTCAE v5.0

Time frame
Assessed throughout the study through 1 year following completion of treatment.

Other outcomes

1

Overall survival (OS)

The Kaplan-Meier method, including descriptive statistics, median OS, and corresponding median OS 95% CI, will be used to characterize OS rates for both treatment groups

Time frame
From randomization until death from any cause or study closure (5 years after last patient first dose).
2

Duration of response (DOR)

The KM method, including descriptive statistics, median DOR, and corresponding median DOR 95% CI, will be used for analysis of DOR for both treatment groups.

Time frame
Time from the first documentation of response to the subsequent date of the first occurrence of PD or death due to any reason, or until study closure (5 years after last patient first dose).

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: