Evaluation of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Lacosamide in Major Depressive Episodes of Bipolar Disorder Types I and II.

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 3
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-65
SponsorUniversity of Sao Paulo

About this trial

Initially, observational studies suggested a possible effect of Lacosamide on depressive and anxious symptoms in individuals with epilepsy, and later, an open-label study demonstrated the efficacy of lacosamide in improving depressive and manic symptoms in individuals with bipolar disorder (BD). The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of combining lacosamide as an augmentation treatment to first- or second-line medication treatments in moderate to severe major depressive episodes of treatment-resistant BD I and II (failure of at least two adequate treatments during the current episode). The main hypothesis of the study is that lacosamide produces a greater reduction in depression scores compared to a placebo treatment and that both groups will exhibit similar rates of side effects and adverse events. We will conduct a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group pilot study, comparing the enhancement of the treatment that patients had been using with lacosamide and placebo, over a duration of 12 weeks. Forty subjects aged between 18 and 65 years with a diagnosis of BD (I or II) in a moderate or severe major depressive episode, despite the use of first- or second-line treatments, will be selected. The primary outcome will be the assessment of lacosamide efficacy through the difference in scores on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) from the initial visit to the end of week 12 of intervention between the lacosamide and placebo groups.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Diagnosis of bipolar disorder (type I or II) confirmed by structured clinical interview;

acute major depressive episode of moderate or severe intensity;

no response to at least two adequate pharmacological interventions to treat the current episode.

Disqualifiers

Current diagnosis of schizophrenia, dementia, intellectual disability, organic mental disorder (by clinical assessment). Comorbidity with other psychiatric disorders (personality disorders, anxiety disorders, substance use disorders, eating disorders, and attention deficit disorder) will be permitted provided the primary diagnosis is bipolar disorder;

acute suicidal ideation (defined by HAMD-17 item 3 ≥ 3 points or by clinical assessment);

current depressive episode with psychotic features (by clinical assessment);

suspected or confirmed pregnancy;

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Lacosamide

    Drug

    Lacosamide 50mg will be give twice a day por 2 weeks, then Lacosamide 100mg twice a day until the end of the study.

  • Placebo

    Drug

    Placebo tablets are similar in its features to the active drug, but without any pharmacological agent inside.

Treatment groups

40 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Active GroupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Placebo GroupPlacebo comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Primary outcome

The efficacy of lacosamide assessed by the difference in Hamilton Depression Scale score from the initial visit to the end of week 12 of the intervention between the lacosamide and placebo groups. Minimum: 0 point Maximum: 50 points. The increase in the pontuation of the scale is related to worse outcomes.

Time frame
week 12

Secondary outcomes

1

Secondary Outcome

Difference in response rates (50% or more reduction) assessed by the Hamilton Depression Scale from the initial visit to the end of week 12 of intervention, between the lacosamide and placebo groups;

Time frame
week 12
2

Secondary outcome

Difference in response rates (50% or more reduction) assessed by the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rate Scale from the initial visit to the end of week 12 of intervention, between the lacosamide and placebo groups;

Time frame
week 12
3

Secondary outcome

Difference in remission rates (\< 7 points) assessed by the Hamilton Depression Scale from the initial visit to the end of week 12 of intervention, between the lacosamide and placebo groups;

Time frame
week 12
4

Secondary outcome

Difference in remission rates (\<11 points) assessed by the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rate Scale from the initial visit to the end of week 12 of intervention, between the lacosamide and placebo groups;

Time frame
week 12

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

University of Sao Paulo

Lead sponsor

Libbs Farmacêutica LTDA

Collaborator