About this trial
It is currently unclear if immediate curative treatment (radiotherapy or surgery) of high-risk prostate cancer without metastasis in older men (\>=75 years) generates the same survival benefits as in younger patients or if the harms/ side-effects of immediate curative treatment outweigh the benefits. In this study the investigators randomize older patients with high-risk, non-metastatic high-risk prostate cancer to either immediate curative therapy or to conservative, more problem-oriented therapy to investigate if immediate curative treatment prolongs life, improves quality of life and is cost-effective.
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
Participant must be 75 years of age or older, at the time of signing the informed consent.
Participants who are healthy as determined by medical evaluation and geriatric G8/ miniCOGTM evaluation (G8: Fit, score >14, or reversibly frail; miniCOGTM: score >2)
Gleason grade 8-10 (ISUP group 4 and 5) other than microscopic, low-volume disease (tumor must be either palpable or visible on MRI, i.e., PIRADS 4 or 5)
Locally advanced PCa (T3 or T4) (unequivocal findings of clinical/ radiological T3 or clinical/ radiological T4 on DRE or MRI; broad capsular contact of tumor on MRI is treated as localized disease, T2, in the context of this study)
Disqualifiers
Dementia (unable to consent) Prior/Concomitant Therapy
Prior radiation to the pelvis
Hormone therapy >3 months prior to randomization Diagnostic assessments
Lymph node metastasis (N0) on MRI, CT or PSMA-PET CT (equivocal N-findings =N0; borderline cases will be discussed and called by a study tumor board).
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Radiotherapy or surgery
Radiationsee arm/ group description
initial observation
Other interventionsee arm/ group description
Hormone therapy
Drugandrogen depression therapy (ADT) by either LHRH agonist or antagonist or androgen monotherapy
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Overall survival
overall survival
Burden of disease
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaire for assessment of health-related quality of life elderly patients with cancer (EORTC ELD 14), burden of disease scale (2 questions, score 0-100, high scores indicate high burden of disease)
Secondary outcomes
Role functioning
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaire for quality of life of cancer patients (EORTC-QLQ-C30), RF2 scale (2 questions, score 0-100, high scores indicate a high / healthy level of functioning)
Urinary irritative/ obstructive symptoms
Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form questionnaire (EPIC-26),urinary scales (score 0-100, higher scores indicating better outcomes)
bowel symptoms
Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form questionnaire (EPIC-26), bowel scales (score 0-100, higher scores indicating better outcomes)
Prostate cancer morbidity
hospitalizations, interventions, complications due to local progression/ systemic progression)
Other outcomes
Institutionalized care
at each follow-up visit the living status of the patients will be assessed. If patients have become dependent on permanent nursing home/ assisted care this will be registered.
Health-related quality of life in cancer patients
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaire for quality of life of cancer patients (EORTC-QLQ-C30), scales not primary/ secondary outcome measures (All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. Thus a high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems)
Health-related quality of life in older cancer patients
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaire for quality of life of cancer patients (EORTC-QLQ-C30), scales not primary outcome (All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. High scores indicate poor mobility, good family support, much worry about the future, good maintenance of autonomy and purpose)
Quality of Life issues in patients with prostate cancer
Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form questionnaire (EPIC-26), scales not secondary outcomes (score 0-100, higher scores indicating better outcomes)
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Sven Löffeler
Lead sponsor
The Hospital of Vestfold
Sponsor institution
Oslo University Hospital
Collaborator
Klinbeforsk
Collaborator