MAintenance Therapy With Aromatase Inhibitor in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (MATAO)

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 3
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexFemale
Age18+
SponsorSwiss GO Trial Group

About this trial

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of addition of letrozole to the standard maintenance therapy in subjects following a primary diagnosis of Estrogen-receptor (ER) positive high and low grade epithelial ovarian cancer (including fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer) and subsequent primary treatment surgery and chemotherapy. Half of the participants will receive to the standard maintenance treatment, letrozole, whilst the other half receives placebo.

The study's primary hypothesis is that the treatment with letrozole increases progression free survival in comparison to the maintenance standard treatment (superiority trial).

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients must be ≥ 18 years of age

Willing and able to attend the visits and to understand all study-related procedures.

Primary, newly diagnosed FIGO Stage II to IV and histologically confirmed low or high grade serous or endometrioid epithelial ovarian/fallopian tube/peritoneal cancer

(Interval-) debulking performed ECOG-Performance Status 0-2

Disqualifiers

Progressive disease at the end of adjuvant treatment as defined in chapter 9.2.1 of protocol

Women of childbearing potential (not having undergone a surgical or radiation sterilization and not getting a surgical resection, prior to the intervention in the therapeutical maintenance setting)

Pregnant or lactating women

Any other malignancy within the last 5 years which has impact on the prognosis of the patient

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Letrozole 2.5mg

    Drug

    Aromatase inhibitor

  • Placebo

    Other intervention

    Placebo tablet of Femara

Treatment groups

540 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Letrozole (aromatase inhibitor)Experimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: PlaceboPlacebo comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Progression-free survival (PFS) for each study group

PFS defined as the time from the date of first IMP administration until the date of progression (recurrence) or death by any cause in the absence of progression. Assessment of progression (recurrence) is generally indicated by SYMPTOMS and will be assessed by the investigator most commonly on the basis of CT scans of the pelvis, abdomen and thorax, according to RECIST v1.1 criteria recommended and mostly presented by an elevated CA-125 level. Elevated CA-125 levels alone shouldn't be considered as progression. Progression assessment according to local standard of care, however, is similarly acceptable.

Time frame
Up to approximately 12 years

Secondary outcomes

1

Overall survival (OS) for each study group

OS defined for each patient as the time from the date of first IMP administration until the date of death from any cause. Patients not having an event at the time of analysis will be censored at the date they were last known to be alive.

Time frame
Up to approximately 12 years
2

Quality-adjusted progression free survival (QAPFS) for each study group

QAPFS defined as the time from the date of first IMP administration until the date of progression (recurrence) or death by any cause in the absence of progression under consideration of the quality of life during this period. QAPFS incorporates progression-free survival (quantity) and quality of life during this period into a measure of net clinical benefit: QAPFS = PFS (years or months) x QoL (utility value). Utility values derived from the EQ-5D-L5 questionnaire will be used.

Time frame
Up to approximately 12 years
3

Time to first subsequent treatment (TFST) for each study group

TFST defined for each patient as the time from the date of first IMP administration until the date the patient started the next (second-line) subsequent anticancer treatment. Patients not receiving a subsequent anticancer treatment at the time of analysis will be censored at the date they were last known to be alive.

Time frame
Up to approximately 12 years
4

Quality-adjusted time without symptoms of toxicity (Q-TWiST) for each study group

Q-TWiST defined as the Quality adjusted Time Without appearance of any Symptoms of Toxicity related to either the progression of the cancer or side effects of the trial medication from the date of first IMP administration until dead. The Q-TWiST analysis considers the following three health states: * (1) the period experiencing toxicity (TOX) * (2) the period before progression without experiencing toxicity (TWiST) * (3) the period after relapse (REL) These periods are assigned preference utilities (u), which will be derived using the generic EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. The Q-TWiST will be calculated as the weighted sum of the time spent in each health state: Q-TWiST = uTox\*TOX + TWiST + uRel\*REL where u denotes the assigned utility for each respective health state.

Time frame
Up to approximately 12 years

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Swiss GO Trial Group

Lead sponsor

AGO Study Group

Collaborator

Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Austria

Collaborator

Reliable Cancer Therapies

Collaborator

Krebsliga Schweiz

Collaborator

Stiftung Guido Feger

Collaborator

Hoffmann-La Roche

Collaborator

Helsana AG

Collaborator

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Collaborator

Anticancer Fund, Belgium

Collaborator