Micronized Progesterone Versus Norethisterone Acetate in Combination With Estrogen as Menopausal Hormone Therapy

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 3
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexFemale
Age45-60
SponsorAngelica Lindén Hirschberg

About this trial

About one third of all women during menopausal transition have significant climacteric symptoms with considerable impact on quality of life. Meta-analysis has shown a beneficial risk profile with menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) for women 50 to 60 years. Still, there is a great need to find safe MHT able to control excessive endometrial stimulation by estrogen without stimulatory effects on the breast by the combination of estrogen/progestogen. Recent observational studies indicate a lower risk for breast cancer using micronized progesterone (mP) combined with estrogen but increased risk of endometrial cancer than by standard MHT. In a randomized trial, the balance between benefits and risks of mP vs. progestogens (norethisterone (NETA)) in combination with estrogen will be explored. For apparent reasons, long-term largescale clinical trials with endometrial and breast cancer as the primary endpoints, are not feasible. However, much knowledge can be obtained using relevant surrogate markers. Mammographic breast density is a strong risk factor for breast cancer, and endometrial hyperplasia is a strong risk factor for endometrial cancer. The primary objective is to compare the effects of one year treatment with mP versus progestogen, in combination with estradiol on mammographic breast density. Furthermore, to evaluate the effect of one year treatment with mP in continuous combination with estradiol on endometrial pathology (hyperplasia and cancer).

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Healthy and naturally postmenopausal women (more than one year since last menstruation or FSH > 40 IE/L) with climacteric symptoms (sweating, hot flush and/or sleep problems) that adversely affect the quality of life

Age 45-60 years

BMI > 19 kg/m2 and ≤ 32 kg/m2

Intact uterus

Disqualifiers

Previous history or risk factors for breast cancer, breast cancer in situ or abnormal mammogram at baseline as assessed clinically by a radiology expert

Previous history or risk factors for endometrial cancer or hyperplasia or abnormal/proliferative endometrial biopsy at baseline

Vaginal bleeding

Any concomitant medical treatment except for well-controlled hypertension, non-insulin treated type 2 diabetes, asthma and hypothyroidism

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Micronized progesterone in continuous combination with oral estrogen

    Drug

    Capsule 100 mg mP (Utrogestan®) orally per day in continuous combination with 1 mg encapsulated estradiol (Estrofem®)

  • Norethisterone acetate in continuous combination with oral estrogen

    Drug

    Capsule 0.5 mg NETA/ 1 mg estradiol (Activelle®) orally per day (encapsulated and identical to Estrofem® and one matched placebo to Utrogestan

Treatment groups

520 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Micronized progesterone in continuous combination with oral estrogenActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Norethisterone acetate in continuous combination with oral estrogenActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Mammographic breast density

Percentage change in mammographic density

Time frame
At baseline and 12 months treatment
2

Endometrial pathology

The incidence of endometrial pathology (hyperplasia or cancer)

Time frame
At baseline and 12 months treatment

Secondary outcomes

1

Breast cell proliferation

Percentage change in breast cell proliferation (proliferation marker Ki-67)

Time frame
At baseline and 12 months treatment
2

Endometrial histology and cell proliferation

Percentage change in endometrial cell proliferation (histology classification and proliferation marker Ki-67)

Time frame
At baseline and 12 months treatment
3

Endometrial thickness

Change in endometrial thickness by ultrasound

Time frame
At baseline and 12 months treatment
4

Bleeding pattern

Bleeding patterns registered in diary (number of days of bleedings)

Time frame
3, 6, 9 and 12 months

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Angelica Lindén Hirschberg

Lead sponsor

Karolinska University Hospital

Sponsor institution