Nedaplatin Versus Cisplatin in Treatment for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 3
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-65
SponsorAffiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University

About this trial

To compare the effectiveness and toxicity of nedaplatin versus cisplatin in induction chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients with newly histologically confirmed non-keratinizing nasopharyngeal carcinoma, including WHO II or III

Original clinical staged as III-IVa (except T3-4N0) according to the 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system

No evidence of distant metastasis (M0)

Age between 18-65

Disqualifiers

Histologically confirmed keratinizing nasopharyngeal carcinoma (WHO I)

Age >65 or < 18 years

Treatment with palliative intent

Prior malignancy except adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, in situ cervical cancer

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Docetaxel, nedaplatin, fluorouracil

    Drug

    Induction chemotherapy. Docetaxel 60 mg/m2 intravenous day1. Nedaplatin 60 mg/m2 intravenous day1. Fluorouracil 3000 mg/m2 continuous intravenous infusion 120 hours from day1. Every 21 days, 3 cycles.

  • Docetaxel, cisplatin, fluorouracil

    Drug

    Induction chemotherapy. Docetaxel 60 mg/m2 intravenous day1. Cisplatin 60 mg/m2 intravenous day1. Fluorouracil 3000 mg/m2 continuous intravenous infusion 120 hours from day1. Every 21 days, 3 cycles.

  • Nedaplatin

    Drug

    Concurrent chemotherapy. Nedaplatin 100 mg/m2 intravenous at day1, 22, 43 of radiotherapy.

  • Cisplatin

    Drug

    Concurrent chemotherapy. Cisplatin 100 mg/m2 intravenous at day1, 22, 43 of radiotherapy.

  • Intensity modulated-radiotherapy

    Radiation

    Intensity modulated-radiotherapy (IMRT) is given as 2.0-2.33 Gy per fraction with five daily fractions per week for 6-7 weeks to a total dose of 66 Gy or greater to the primary tumor.

Treatment groups

352 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: DNF-NExperimental treatment 3 interventions
Group B: DPF-PActive comparator 3 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Progress-Free Survival (PFS)

Progress-free survival is calculated from the date of randomisation to the date of locoregional failure, distant failure, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first.

Time frame
3 years

Secondary outcomes

1

Overall Survival(OS)

The OS was defined as the duration from the date of random assignment to the date of death from any cause or censored at the date of the last follow-up.

Time frame
3 years
2

Locoregional Relapse-Free Survival(LRRFS)

Relapse-free survival was defined as the time from random assignment to local or regional relapse, or death from any cause.

Time frame
3 years
3

Distant metastasis-Free Survival(DMFS)

Distant metastasis-free survival was defined as the time from random assignment to distant metastasis, or death from any cause.

Time frame
3 years
4

Quality of life (QoL)

Quality of life (QoL) was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire module for head and neck (EORTC QLQ-H\&N35). The EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 scale employs a 4-point response format ("not at all" to "very much"). Scale scores are transformed to a scale from 0 to 100 according to the EORTC scoring algorithm. For the functioning and the global QoL scale, a higher score indicates better health. For the symptom scales, a higher score indicates a higher level of symptom burden. Either English or Chinese version will be used according to patient's language habits.

Time frame
3 years

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.