About this trial
This is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, Phase 3 study in participants with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma to evaluate the benefits of teclistamab in combination with lenalidomide and teclistamab alone versus lenalidomide alone as maintenance therapy after autologous stem cell transplant.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Must have a new diagnosis of multiple myeloma according to IMWG criteria and have received induction +/- consolidation.
Must have received only one line of therapy and achieved at least a partial response (≥PR) as per IMWG 2016 response criteria (Kumar 2016) without evidence of progression at the time of first treatment dose.
Must not be intolerant to the starting dose of lenalidomide.
Must not have received any maintenance therapy.
Disqualifiers
Received any prior BCMA-directed therapy.
Any previous therapy with an immune cell redirecting agent or gene modified adoptive cell therapy (eg, chimeric antigen receptor modified T cells, NK cells).
Discontinued treatment due to any AE related to lenalidomide as determined by the investigator.
Progressed on multiple myeloma therapy at any time prior to screening.
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Teclistamab
DrugTeclistamab will be administered via a subcutaneous injection (SC)
Lenalidomide
DrugLenalidomide will be administered orally
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of disease progression (as assessed by IMWG criteria) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first.
Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)-negative Complete Response (CR)
12-month MRD-negative CR is defined as participants who achieve MRD-negative status at 12 months, as determined by next-generation flow cytometry (NGF) with sensitivity of 10\^-5, prior to progressive disease or subsequent anti-myeloma therapy, whichever is earlier, and who also achieve CR of better, according to IMWG criteria.
Secondary outcomes
Comparison of efficacy
Efficacy, assessed by rate of CR or better, MRD negative CR, sustained MRD negativity, CR and MRD negative conversion PFS after next line of therapy (PFS2), time to next treatment (TTNT), OS and also safety, PK and immunogenicity
Overall Survival (OS)
Overall Survival (OS), measured from the date of from randomization to the date the subject's death
Change in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire 30-item Core module (EORTC QLQ-C30) score and the difference between-treatment arms
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire containing both single and multi-item measures. These include five functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, and Social Functioning), three symptom scales (Fatigue, Pain, and Nausea/Vomiting), a Global Health Status/ Quality-of-Life (QoL) scale, and six single items (Constipation, Diarrhea, Insomnia, Dyspnea, Appetite Loss, and Financial Difficulties). The scores ranges from 0-100, a high score for functional scales and for Global Health Status/QoL represent better functioning ability or Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HRQoL), whereas a high score for symptom scales and single items represents significant symptomatology.
EQ-5D-5L health utility values and the difference between-treatment arms
The EQ-5D-5L is a 5 item questionnaire that assesses 5 domains including mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression plus a visual analog scale rating "health today"
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
European Myeloma Network B.V.
Lead sponsor
Janssen Pharmaceutica
Collaborator