About this trial
This is a Phase III, multisite exploratory study for women ≥ 65 years of age with early stage estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer. These individuals will be treated randomly assigned to one of two groups:
Intervention, treated with 3 months of pre-operative endocrine therapy (pre-ET) OR Control, participants follow standard of care and proceed directly to breast cancer surgery.
Both arms will be assessed for tolerance and compliance to the endocrine therapy by patient reported outcome (PRO) measures (patient surveys).
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Diagnosis of ER+, PR +/-, and HER2- non amplified invasive breast cancer and clinically negative nodes
ECOG performance status 0-2
Females, aged ≥ 65 years
Patient is eligible for BCS and opted for BCS
Disqualifiers
Bilateral synchronous breast cancer
Multicentric disease
Prior use of Tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors
History of ipsilateral breast radiation therapy
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Tamoxifen, Letrozole, Anastrozole, or Exemestane
DrugChoice and dose of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy at the discretion of the treating medical oncologist.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Proportion of participants who omit Radiation Therapy (RT) and are non-adherent to Endocrine Therapy (ET)
Proportion of participants who omit RT and are non-adherent to ET as measure through the 24-month adjuvant follow-up visit
Proportion of participants who are treated with Breast Cancer Surgery (BCS) + RT + AET
Proportion of participants who are treated with BCS + RT + AET as measured through the 24-month adjuvant follow-up visit
Secondary outcomes
Treatment with pre-ET and its impact on Decision Conflict
Using Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) assessments of Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) to determine whether treatment with pre-ET lessens Decision Conflict. The DCS is a validated measure of patient perceptions of uncertainty surrounding treatment choices. The minimum score is a 0, which is interpreted as no decisional conflict, and the maximum score is 64, which is interpreted as the highest decisional conflict.
Treatment with pre-ET and its impact on Decision Regret
Using Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) assessments of Decision Regret Scale (DRS) to determine whether treatment with pre-ET lessens Decision Regret. The DRS is a validated, 5-item scale that measures self-reported regret after health care decisions. DRS scores range from 0 (no regret) to 100 (high regret).
Assessing whether patient's final treatment correlates with their beliefs about breast cancer
Using the PRO assessment "Beliefs about Illness Questionnaire (BIP-Q)" to determine patient's beliefs about breast cancer. The BIP-Q is a validated survey to assess cognitive and emotional perceptions of illness.
Assessing whether patient's final treatment correlates with their beliefs about breast cancer
Using the PRO assessment "Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ)" to determine patient's beliefs about breast cancer. The BMQ is a validated survey designed to capture patients' perceptions about medicines and medicine adherence.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.