Testing Higher Dose Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 3
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorNRG Oncology

About this trial

This phase III trial compares the effect of dose-escalated radiation therapy to usual care in patients with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who have received an initial 4-8 months of chemotherapy. Usual care options include additional chemotherapy, observation, or standard lower-dose radiation therapy. These treatments may delay tumor growth but have not been shown to improve survival. Radiation therapy uses high energy X-rays to kill cancer cells and shrink tumors. Dose-escalated radiation therapy involves the precise delivery of higher doses to the tumor, often over a shorter period of time. This trial assesses whether using dose-escalated radiation therapy can prolong survival.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

At time of enrollment, the patient must have received 4-8 months of active chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX or NALIRIFOX or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. Patients are permitted to receive more than 1 type of chemotherapy for reasons other than radiographic progression by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (i.e. chemotherapy regimen switch is allowed for toxicity, and/or switch is allowed for toxicity and/or CA19-9 level not declining). Patients are allowed to receive chemotherapy after restaging scans, as long as 1) restaging scans are performed after at least 4 months of chemotherapy and 2) the total chemotherapy duration does not exceed 8 months

"Active chemotherapy" refers to time on chemotherapy not counting treatment breaks (i.e. if a patient had 1 month of chemotherapy followed by 1 month break, this would count as 1 month chemotherapy). Study registration must occur within 45 days of last day of pre-study entry chemotherapy

Pathologically (histologically or cytologically) proven diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Locally advanced unresectable disease (as defined per the National Comprehensive Cancer Network [NCCN] guidelines and institutional tumor board review)

Disqualifiers

None

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Biopsy Procedure

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo tumor tissue biopsy

  • Biospecimen Collection

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo blood sample collection

  • Capecitabine

    Drug

    Given capecitabine

  • Computed Tomography

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo CT or PET/CT

  • Dose-escalated Radiation Therapy

    Radiation

    Undergo dose-escalated radiation using intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning

  • Fluorouracil

    Drug

    Given fluorouracil

  • Gemcitabine

    Drug

    Given gemcitabine

  • Irinotecan Hydrochloride

    Drug

    Given irinotecan hydrochloride

  • Irinotecan Sucrosofate

    Drug

    Given liposomal irinotecan

  • Leucovorin Calcium

    Drug

    Given leucovorin calcium

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo MRI

  • Nab-paclitaxel

    Drug

    Given nab-paclitaxel

  • Observation Activity

    Other intervention

    Undergo observation

  • Oxaliplatin

    Drug

    Given oxaliplatin

  • Positron Emission Tomography

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo PET/CT

  • Questionnaire Administration

    Other intervention

    Ancillary studies

  • Radiation Therapy

    Radiation

    Undergo standard radiation therapy

  • Tumor Treating Fields Therapy

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo TTF

Treatment groups

356 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Arm I (Options 1, 2, or 3)Active comparator 17 interventions
Group B: Arm II (dose-escalated RT)Experimental treatment 9 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Overall survival (OS)

OS will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method (Kaplan 1958). The 3-year OS estimates between the two arms will be compared using a Z-test. A logistic regression model will be used to analyze the effects of factors, in addition to treatment, including, but not limited to the stratification factor, which may be associated with 3-year OS. The primary hypothesis of improved 3-year OS will be tested with a 1-sided significance level of 0.023 (level based on not having stopped at either of the 2 planned interim analyses).

Time frame
From randomization to the date of death or last follow-up, assessed up to 3 years

Secondary outcomes

1

Local progression (LP)

Defined as progression of the primary tumor/nodes as determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria. LP will be estimated by the cumulative incidence method (Kalbfleish 1980), with death as a competing risk, and compared between treatment arms using Gray's test (Gray 1988). The Fine-Gray regression model will be used to analyze the effects of factors, in addition to treatment, which may be associated with LP (Fine 1999).

Time frame
From randomization to date of failure, date of death (competing event), or last known follow-up date, assessed up to 5 years
2

Progression-free survival (PFS)

Defined as local progression, distant failure, or death due to any cause. PFS will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method (Kaplan 1958) and estimates between treatment arms will be compared using the log-rank test (Mantel 1966). The Cox proportional hazard regression model will be used to analyze the effects of factors, in addition to treatment, which may be associated with PFS (Cox 1972).

Time frame
From the date of randomization to the date of first PFS failure or last follow-up for patients without a reported PFS event, assessed up to 5 years
3

Chemotherapy-free interval (CFI)

Defined as the time in months without chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer post the initial chemotherapy treatment. Mean CFI will be compared between treatment arms using a Z-test. Regression modeling will be used to analyze the effects of factors, in addition to treatment, which may be associated with CFI.

Time frame
From the date of last dose of initial chemotherapy to the date of first dose of second line chemotherapy for progression, assessed up to 5 years
4

Long-term radiation-related ≥ grade 3 adverse events

The percentage of patients on the dose-escalated radiation therapy arm will be reported.

Time frame
Up to 1 year after randomization

Other outcomes

1

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep) total score at 6 months

Mean FACT-Hep total score at 6 months will be compared between treatment arms using a t-test, if normality is met, or Wilcoxon test if not. Regression modeling will be used to analyze the effects of factors (e.g. stratification factor and other relevant baseline factors), in addition to treatment, that may be associated with 6-month mean FACT-Hep Total Score.

Time frame
At 6 months
2

FACT-Hep score nadir

The nadir is defined as the lowest score after baseline assessment. Mean nadir (for each of total score and Hep subscale) will be compared between treatment arms using a t-test, if normality is met, or Wilcoxon test if not, using 2-sided alpha=0.01 to account for multiple comparisons.

Time frame
From baseline to 24 months from randomization
3

FACT-Hep total score over time

Longitudinal analyses incorporating all follow-up time points will be done using longitudinal linear modeling methods to assess FACT-Hep Total Score trends across time. Baseline scores, treatment arm, time, treatment by time interaction (if significant), the stratification factor, and relevant covariates will be included in the model analyses. Other than baseline score, treatment arm, and time, only covariates with a 2-sided p-value \< 0.01, to account for multiple comparisons, will be retained in the model.

Time frame
From baseline to 24 months from randomization

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.