Testing Immunotherapy With or Without Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Patients With Advanced Liver Cancer, HELIO-RT Trial

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 3
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorNRG Oncology

About this trial

This phase III trial compares the effect of immunotherapy (IO) with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to IO alone in treating patients with liver cancer (hepatocellular cancer) that may have spread from where it first started to nearby tissue, lymph nodes, or distant parts of the body (advanced). The usual approach is treatment with IO-based drug combinations, such as atezolizumab and bevacizumab, durvalumab and tremelimumab, or ipilimumab and nivolumab. IO with monoclonal antibodies, such as durvalumab, tremelimumab, atezolizumab, nivolumab and ipilimumab, may help the body's immune system attack the tumor, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Bevacizumab is in a class of medications called antiangiogenic agents. It works by stopping the formation of blood vessels that bring oxygen and nutrients to tumor. This may slow the growth and spread of tumor cells. Radiation therapy uses high energy x-rays, particles, or radioactive seeds to kill cancer cells and shrink tumors. SBRT is a type of external radiation therapy that uses special equipment to position a patient and precisely deliver radiation to tumors in the body (except the brain). The total dose of radiation is divided into smaller doses given over several days. This type of radiation therapy helps spare normal tissue. Giving IO with SBRT may be more effective than IO alone in helping patients with advanced hepatocellular cancer live longer.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Pathologically (histologically or cytologically) proven diagnosis of HCC (strongly recommended)

Radiographically proven (American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases [AASLD] criteria) diagnosis of HCC by multiphasic MRI and/or CT scan is allowed.

For patients with a prior or concurrent malignancy, pathologic confirmation of hepatocellular cancer is required.

HCC macrovascular invasion, defined as enhancing vascular thrombosis demonstrating arterial enhancement and venous or delayed venous washout on multiphasic MRI and/or CT is required.

Disqualifiers

None

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Atezolizumab

    Biological/Vaccine

    Given IV

  • Bevacizumab

    Biological/Vaccine

    Given IV

  • Biospecimen Collection

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo blood sample collection

  • Computed Tomography

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo CT and PET/CT

  • Durvalumab

    Biological/Vaccine

    Given IV

  • Ipilimumab

    Biological/Vaccine

    Given IV

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo MRI

  • Nivolumab

    Biological/Vaccine

    Given IV

  • Positron Emission Tomography

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo PET/CT

  • Questionnaire Administration

    Other intervention

    Ancillary studies

  • Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

    Radiation

    Undergo liver SBRT

  • Tremelimumab

    Biological/Vaccine

    Given IV

Treatment groups

226 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Arm 1 (IO-based systemic therapy alone [Treatment A/B/C])Active comparator 11 interventions
Group B: Arm 2 (SBRT + IO-based systemic therapy [Treatment A/B/C])Experimental treatment 12 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Overall survival (OS)

Will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method (Kaplan 1958). The distributions of the OS estimates between the two arms will be compared using a log-rank test. The Cox regression model will be used to analyze the effects of factors, in addition to treatment, including, but not limited to stratification factors, which may be associated with OS. The primary analysis will happen after at least 150 OS events (deaths) have occurred and will be tested with a 1-sided significance level of 0.022 (level based on not having stopped at either of the 2 planned interim analyses).

Time frame
From the date of randomization to the date of death or last follow-up, assessed up to 5 years

Secondary outcomes

1

Progression-free survival (PFS)

Defined as local progression, distant failure, or death due to any cause. PFS will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method (Kaplan 1958) and estimates between treatment arms will be compared using the log-rank test (Mantel 1966). The Cox proportional hazard regression model will be used to analyze the effects of factors, in addition to treatment, which may be associated with PFS (Cox 1972).

Time frame
From the date of randomization to the date of first PFS failure or last follow-up for patients without a reported PFS event, assessed up to 5 years
2

Objective response rate (ORR)

Defined as having a complete or partial response. ORR will be compared between treatment arms using a chi-squared test. Duration of response will also be reported.

Time frame
Up to 5 years
3

Vascular recanalization (VR)

Defined as having a complete or partial vascular thrombosis response. The VR proportion for each treatment arm will be determined and compared between treatment arms using a chi-squared test. Time to best VR response before progression and duration of VR response will be reported, but no statistical testing will be done.

Time frame
Up to 5 years
4

Short-term toxicity

Defined as grade ≥ 4 adverse events (AEs). Will be compared between the treatment arms using a Z-test.

Time frame
Up to 90 days from randomization

Other outcomes

1

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep) mean total score at 6 Months

Mean FACT-Hep total score will be compared between treatment arms using a t-test, if normality is met, or Wilcoxon rank-sum test if not. Regression modeling will be used to analyze the effects of factors (e.g. stratification factors and other relevant baseline factors), in addition to treatment, that may be associated with 6-month mean FACT-Hep total score. No statistical testing will be done for subscales.

Time frame
At 6 months
2

FACT-Hep total score over time

A mixed effects model will be used to assess changes over time. Fixed effects will include baseline scores, treatment arm, stratification factors, as well as the interaction between time and treatment. If the interaction between time and treatment is significant at the 0.05 level, t-tests assessing the between arm difference at each timepoint, within the context of the model, will be conducted.

Time frame
At baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months from randomization
3

Quality-adjusted survival

If the primary endpoint supports the primary hypothesis and/or the European Quality of Life Five Dimension (EQ-5D) significantly differs between treatment arms, the quality-adjusted survival of each treatment will be evaluated and compared using the EQ-5D scale. The EQ-5D is a 2-part self-assessment questionnaire. To examine trade-offs between the survival time and QOL, they will be combined for each patient into a single measurement: quality-adjusted life years (QALY). QALY is defined by the weighted sum of different time episodes added up to a total quality-adjusted survival time. QALY will be analyzed using the EQ-5D, using a 2-sided alpha=0.025 to adjust for multiple comparisons.

Time frame
At baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months post treatment completion
4

OS by sex

Estimates of the primary outcome treatment effect and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by sex will be provided.

Time frame
From the date of randomization to the date of death or last follow-up, assessed up to 5 years

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.