Testing the Investigational Medication Pembrolizumab After Kidney Removal for Patients With Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phasePhase 3
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)

About this trial

This phase III trial compares the effect of pembrolizumab to active surveillance after a surgical procedure to completely or partially remove a kidney (nephrectomy) in improving time without disease in patients with non-clear cell renal cell cancer. Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as pembrolizumab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Giving pembrolizumab after nephrectomy may be more effective than the usual active surveillance approach for improving time without disease in patients with non-clear cell renal cell cancer.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patient must be ≥ 18 years of age

Patient must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2

Patient must have histologically confirmed non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) with ≥ pT3Nx or pTanyN+ or pTanyNanyM1 with no evidence of disease (NED) per the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition

Patient must not have renal medullary carcinoma

Disqualifiers

None

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Biospecimen Collection

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo collection of blood samples

  • Bone Scan

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo bone scan

  • Computed Tomography

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo CT and PET/CT

  • Echocardiography Test

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo ECHO

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo MRI

  • Patient Observation

    Other intervention

    Undergo active surveillance

  • Pembrolizumab

    Biological/Vaccine

    Given IV

  • Positron Emission Tomography

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo PET/CT

Treatment groups

400 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Arm A (active surveillance)Active comparator 7 interventions
Group B: Arm B (pembrolizumab)Experimental treatment 7 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Disease-free survival (DFS)

A superiority test of DFS for pembrolizumab arm versus (vs.) active surveillance arm will be performed at one-sided 0.025 significance level, using a stratified log-rank test assuming exponential failure.

Time frame
From randomization to first documented local recurrence, distant metastasis, secondary systemic malignancy, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 10 years

Secondary outcomes

1

Overall survival (OS)

OS will be assessed among all randomized patients. Kaplan-Meier estimate will characterize OS and OS comparison will be made for pembrolizumab vs. active surveillance arm using stratified log-rank test and assuming exponential failure.

Time frame
From randomization to death from any cause, assessed up to 10 years
2

Incidence of adverse events

Adverse events will be described separately for patients treated on each arm to evaluate safety and tolerability. Toxicity will be defined using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. All patients who receive treatment, regardless of eligibility, will be evaluated for toxicity. The 90% confidence interval for the true probability of observing a toxicity of Grade 4 or higher on a given arm will be no wider than 12.1% for each arm. The probability of observing one or more toxicities on a given arm with a true rate of 1% is 86.6% for each arm.

Time frame
Up to 1 year
3

DFS among those that are circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid (ctDNA) positive

The first ctDNA analysis objective is to compare DFS between patients randomized to pembrolizumab arm vs. active surveillance arm among patients that are ctDNA positive at baseline. Among patients that are ctDNA positive at baseline, DFS will be compared between patients randomized to pembrolizumab arm vs. surveillance arm using a stratified log-rank test at 0.05 two-sided alpha level assuming exponential failure. Hazard ratios (HRs) for recurrence or death will be reported using a univariable cox proportional hazards model.

Time frame
Up to 10 years
4

OS among those that are ctDNA positive

The second ctDNA analysis objective is to compare OS between patients randomized to pembrolizumab arm vs. active surveillance arm among patients that are ctDNA positive at baseline. Among 72 patients that are predicted to be ctDNA positive at baseline, OS will be compared between patients randomized to Pembrolizumab arm vs. surveillance arm using a stratified log-rank test at 0.05 two-sided alpha level assuming exponential failure. HRs for recurrence or death will be reported using a univariable cox proportional hazards model.

Time frame
Up to 10 years

Other outcomes

1

DFS by sex

Estimates of the primary outcome treatment effect and the corresponding 95% confidence interval will be provided by sex.

Time frame
Up to 10 years
2

DFS by race

Estimates of the primary outcome treatment effect and the corresponding 95% confidence interval will be provided by race.

Time frame
Up to 10 years
3

DFS by ethnicity

Estimates of the primary outcome treatment effect and the corresponding 95% confidence interval will be provided by ethnicity.

Time frame
Up to 10 years

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: