The Effect of a Six Week Intensified Pharmacological Treatment for Bipolar Depression Compared to Treatment as Usual in Subjects Who Had a First-time Treatment Failure on Their First-line Treatment.

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 3
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorDr. Inge Winter

About this trial

Bipolar disorders affect approximately 4.5 million people across the European Union (EU) and are associated with high annual healthcare and societal costs. Bipolar disorder I and II represent disorders that cause extreme fluctuation in a person's mood, energy, and ability to function, in which symptoms of (hypo)mania and depression alternate. The depressive episodes of bipolar disorders are often referred to as bipolar depression (BD). In other words: it is a phase/state of the disorder. For many patients with BD, the depressive polarity is often more pervasive and more debilitating than manic states, with estimates that depressed mood accounts for up to two-thirds of the time spent unwell, even with treatment. The burden of not received an effective treatment for BD is high: more severe psychopathology, higher rates of unemployment, more hospitalisations, lower quality of life, lower cognitive functioning, risk of suicide, comorbidities and poorer social and occupational functioning and thus more carer burden. For BD, the treatment guidelines are very heterogeneous, amongst other reasons because the disease is heterogeneous and treatments should be tailored to the patients. There is no clear treatment algorithm and it cannot yet be predicted which treatment will be effective. Especially the place of adjunctive antidepressants is under debate. Usually, for psychiatric disorders (including bipolar disorder), a patient is considered to be treatment-resistant is two medicinal treatments have been tried (in sufficient duration and dosage) without sufficient success. For BD, there is no consensus on when to consider a patient as treatment-resistant, but the most common definition is after one prior treatment failure. This raises the research question whether adjunctive antidepressants to treat BD should be introduced earlier in the treatment. Additionally, The INTENSIFY trial is part of the larger Horizon 2021 project, with the central goal of paving the way for a shift towards a treatment decision-making process tailored for the individual at risk for treatment resistance. To that end, we aim to establish evidence-based criteria to make decisions of early intense treatment in individuals at risk for treatment resistance across the major psychiatric disorders of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depression.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

In- or out patients, at least 18 years of age.

Being willing and able to provide written informed consent. Having a legal guardian to cosign is allowed. Informed consent will be signed at visit 1, before any study procedure.

Female subjects of child bearing potential must use effective contraception during the trial as per the requirements of the applicable SmPCs and should have a negative pregnancy test at visit 1 or 2 (before randomisation). Male subjects that will use valproate acid during the trial must use effective contraceptive measures during the trial (see section 8.2.1).

Meeting diagnostic criteria for a primary diagnosis of bipolar depression (bipolar disorder type I and II currently in a depressive episode), according to DSM-5. The primary diagnosis will be confirmed by the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI v7.0.2).

Disqualifiers

Being pregnant or breastfeeding.

Subject has a known intolerance to quetiapine or to all EIPT medication or to all TAU medication.

Meeting any of the contraindications for quetiapine, or to all EIPT medication or to all TAU medication options, as specified within the applicable SmPC, supported by clinically significant abnormal values on local laboratory tests, electrocardiogram (ECG) or physical examinations.

Subject has participated in another clinical trial in which the subject received an experimental or investigational drug or agent within 30 days before visit 1.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Escitalopram

    Drug

    See arm description

  • Sertraline

    Drug

    See arm description

  • Venlafaxine

    Drug

    See arm description

  • Lithium

    Drug

    See arm description

  • Valproate acid

    Drug

    See arm description

  • Quetiapine

    Drug

    See arm description

  • Bupropion

    Drug

    See arm description

Treatment groups

418 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Bipolar Depression EIPT: Switch to one of the following combinations:Experimental treatment 7 interventions
Group B: Bipolar Depression TAU: Switch to quetiapine plus lithium or valproate acidActive comparator 3 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Comparing the change in symptom severity on Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale

Mean in symptom severity (EIPT vs. TAU) total score from baseline (visit 2) to end of treatment (visit 4). This is measured using the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale.Minimum score is 0, maximum score is 60. A bigger mean change means a better outcome

Time frame
6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

1

Compare proportion of participants that is in symptomatic remission

Comparison of the proportion of participants (EIPT vs. TAU) that is in symptomatic remission at visit 4. Remission is defined as a Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating scale score of ≤ 12.

Time frame
6 weeks
2

Compare the change in the severity and improvement CGI-S sub-scores

To compare changes in the severity sub-score of the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI 2) between the two treatment arms (EIPT/TAU) over the six week treatment period (visit 2 versus visit 4). Higher scores indicate higher illness severity. Minimum score: 1, maximum score: 7

Time frame
6 weeks
3

Compare the change in the severity and improvement CGI-I sub-scores

To compare mean changes in the total improvement sub-score of the Clinical Global Impression (CGI 2) between the two treatment arms (EIPT/TAU) over the six week treatment period (visit 2 versus visit 4). A higher score means lower treatment improvement. Minimum score: 1, maximum score: 7

Time frame
6 weeks
4

Compare the changes in the levels of depression and anxiety

To compare changes in the levels of depression and anxiety as assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale between the two treatment arms (EIPT/TAU) over the four week treatment period (visit 2 versus visit 4). Lower scores mean less depression and anxiety.

Time frame
6 weeks

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Dr. Inge Winter

Lead sponsor

UMC Utrecht

Sponsor institution

Universität Münster

Collaborator