The Effect of a Six Week Intensified Pharmacological Treatment for Major Depressive Disorder Compared to Treatment as Usual in Subjects Who Had a First-time Treatment Failure on Their First-line Treatment.

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 3
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-65
SponsorDr. Inge Winter

About this trial

Over 28 million people suffer from current depressive disorder in the European Union. Major depressive disorder (MDD) is one of the most common psychiatric illnesses. The symptoms cause clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, and other important areas of functioning. To treat MDD, there are several antidepressants available and prescribing medication is a process of trial-and-error. Guidelines do not explicitly advise on the order in which antidepressant medication should be prescribed. The choice of antidepressant should be tailored to the patient, while involving the patient in the decision-making process. In general, the choice for the first- and second-line treatment will be a second-generation antidepressant. Recently, esketamine nasal spray (intranasal (IN) administration) was approved for patients with treatment-resistant MDD (TRD). A patient is diagnosed with TRD when having used two antidepressants in sufficient duration and adequate dose without sufficient effect. TRD is associated with a negative impact on quality of life, higher risk for hospitalisations and suicide, comorbidities, poorer social and occupational functioning and a high carer burden. The efficacy of intranasal use of esketamine has been demonstrated in MDD subjects with treatment-resistant symptoms but also in subjects with non-treatment resistant depression, and is approved by the FDA and EMA as a third-line treatment. Besides the registered esketamine nasal spray, which is not available in all countries to all patients because of the high costs, off-label utilization of (es)ketamine infusions (IV) is growing extensively over time to treat TRD. Research conducted so far indicates an unequivocal initial substantial response to (es)ketamine IV in MDD populations, regardless of whether or not patients suffer from treatment resistant MDD. However, until now, there has not been a study investigating this in a sufficiently large population. This may be a unique opportunity to potentially prevent patients progressing into a treatment resistant illness stage. The potential implications of the results of the current study are the prevention of unnecessary trials of ineffective treatments, reducing subject burden substantially, as well as a reduction of healthcare and societal costs.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

In- or outpatients, at least 18 years of age up until 65.

Being willing and able to provide written informed consent. Having a legal guardian to cosign is allowed. Informed consent will be signed at visit 1, before any study procedure.

Female subjects of child bearing potential must use effective contraception during the trial as per the requirements of the applicable SmPCs and should have a negative pregnancy test at visit 1 or 2 (before randomisation).

Meeting diagnostic criteria for a primary diagnosis of major depressive disorder (without psychotic features), according to DSM-5. The primary diagnosis will be confirmed by the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI v7.0.2).

Disqualifiers

Being pregnant or breastfeeding.

Subject has used (es)ketamine previously for the treatment of depressive symptoms.

Subject has a known intolerance to (es)ketamine or to all TAU medication.

Meeting any of the contraindications for (es)ketamine, or to all TAU medication options, as specified within the applicable SmPC, supported by clinically significant abnormal values on local laboratory tests, electrocardiogram (ECG) or physical examinations.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Esketamine Nasal Product

    Drug

    See arm description

  • Ketamine Hydrochloride

    Drug

    See arm description

  • Esketamine hydrochloride

    Drug

    See arm description

  • Second-line Antidepressants

    Drug

    See arm description

Treatment groups

418 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Major Depressive Disorder EIPT: second-line antidepressant + esketamine nasal sprayExperimental treatment 3 interventions
Group B: Major Depressive Disorder TAU: second-line antidepressantActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Comparing the change in symptom severity on Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale

Change in symptom severity (EIPT vs. TAU) total score from baseline (visit 2) to end of treatment (visit 4). This is measured using the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale. Minimum score is 0, maximum score 60. A bigger mean change means a better outcome

Time frame
6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

1

Compare proportion of participants that is in symptomatic remission

Comparison of the proportion of participants (EIPT vs. TAU) that is in symptomatic remission at visit 4. Remission is defined as a Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating scale score of ≤ 12.

Time frame
6 weeks
2

Compare the change in the severity and improvement CGI-S sub-scores

To compare changes in the severity sub-score of the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI 2) between the two treatment arms (EIPT/TAU) over the four week treatment period (visit 2 versus visit 4). Higher scores indicate higher illness severity. Minimum score: 1, maximum score: 7

Time frame
6 weeks
3

Compare the change in the severity and improvement CGI-I sub-scores

To compare changes in the total improvement sub-score of the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI 2) between the two treatment arms (EIPT/TAU) over the four week treatment period (visit 2 versus visit 4). A higher score means lower treatment improvement. Minimum score: 1, maximum score: 7

Time frame
6 weeks
4

Compare the changes in the levels of depression and anxiety

To compare changes in the levels of depression and anxiety as assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale between the two treatment arms (EIPT/TAU) over the four week treatment period (visit 2 versus visit 4). Lower scores mean less depression and anxiety.

Time frame
6 weeks

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Dr. Inge Winter

Lead sponsor

UMC Utrecht

Sponsor institution

Universität Münster

Collaborator