Utility of Adjusting Chemotherapy Dose & Dosing Schedule With the SALVage Weekly Dose-dense Regimen in Patients With Poor Prognostic OVARian Cancers Based on the Tumor Unfavorable Primary Chemosensitivity and Incomplete Debulking Surgery

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 3
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexFemale
Age18+
SponsorARCAGY/ GINECO GROUP

About this trial

SALVOVAR will be a pragmatic open-label multicenter randomized phase III trial (ratio 1:1) comparing the efficacy of the salvage weekly dose-dense regimen with those of the continuation of the standard regimen.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Histologically confirmed high-grade epithelial (serous, endometrioid, or carcinosarcoma with a ≥30% epithelial tumor component) ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian-tube carcinoma

Adult patient aged ≥ 18 years old

Advanced stage III or IV disease

Unfavorable standardized KELIMTM score < 1.0 calculated with the KELIMTM academic tool and available for free on internet site (https://www.biomarker-kinetics.org/CA-125-neo) (poor primary chemosensitivity)

Disqualifiers

None

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Carboplatin

    Drug

    Patients will be randomized 1:1: * Experimental arm: Densification of the chemotherapy administration dose and dosing schedule of carboplatin-paclitaxel (carboplatin AUC 5 every 3 weeks on day 1 and paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 every week, on day 1, day 8, and day 15, with 3 week-cycles) for 3 cycles * Standard arm: Continuation of the same 3-weekly carboplatin-paclitaxel, as administered during the neo-adjuvant chemotherapy

  • Paclitaxel

    Drug

    Patients will be randomized 1:1: * Experimental arm: Densification of the chemotherapy administration dose and dosing schedule of carboplatin-paclitaxel (carboplatin AUC 5 every 3 weeks on day 1 and paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 every week, on day 1, day 8, and day 15, with 3 week-cycles) for 3 cycles * Standard arm: Continuation of the same 3-weekly carboplatin-paclitaxel, as administered during the neo-adjuvant chemotherapy

Treatment groups

250 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Experimental armExperimental treatment 2 interventions
Group B: StandardActive comparator 2 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Percentage of patients operated with late complete debulking surgery

To demonstrate the superiority in terms of efficacy of a densification of the chemotherapy with the salvage weekly dose-dense carboplatin-paclitaxel regimen compared to the continuation of the standard 3-weekly carboplatin-paclitaxel, in ovarian cancer patients found to have a poor prognostic disease (characterized by a poor chemosensitivity, with an unfavorable KELIMTM score \< 1.0, and a disease not amenable to complete interval debulking surgery) after 3 cycles of standard neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.

Time frame
From the date of randomization until patients operated with late complete debulking surgery, assessed up 100 days
2

Overall survival (OS)

To demonstrate the superiority in terms of efficacy of a densification of the chemotherapy with the salvage weekly dose-dense carboplatin-paclitaxel regimen compared to the continuation of the standard 3-weekly carboplatin-paclitaxel, in ovarian cancer patients found to have a poor prognostic disease (characterized by a poor chemosensitivity, with an unfavorable KELIMTM score \< 1.0, and a disease not amenable to complete interval debulking surgery) after 3 cycles of standard neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.

Time frame
From the date of randomization until death due to any cause, assessed up to 5 years

Secondary outcomes

1

Percentage of patients operated with late complete debulking surgery, regardless of the number of chemotherapy cycles received

To compare the efficacy, in term of percentage of patients operated with late complete debulking surgery, between the salvage weekly dose-dense regimen and the standard regimen, regardless of the number of chemotherapy cycles received.

Time frame
from the date of randomization until objective tumor progression based on RECIST 1.1, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first assessed up to 3 years
2

Overall response rate according to RECIST V1.1 in the whole population

To compare the efficacy of the salvage weekly dose-dense regimen with those of the standard regimen in terms of: * Radiological response after 3 cycles of treatment, based on the best radiological response using RECIST criteria * Progression-free survival

Time frame
from the date of randomization until objective tumor progression based on RECIST 1.1, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first assessed up to 3 years
3

Progression-free survival in the whole population

To compare the efficacy of the salvage weekly dose-dense regimen with those of the standard regimen in terms of: • Radiological response after 3 cycles of treatment, based on the best radiological response using RECIST criteria

Time frame
from the date of randomization until objective tumor progression based on RECIST 1.1, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first assessed up to 3 years
4

Percentage of patients treated with a subsequent maintenance treatment with a PARP inhibitor (%) in the whole population

To assess the impact of the adjustment to the salvage weekly dose-dense regimen on the rate of subsequent prescription of PARP inhibitors (since these drugs are indicated in patients with complete or partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy) in terms of survival.

Time frame
from the date of randomization until objective tumor progression based on RECIST 1.1, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first assessed up to 3 years

Other outcomes

1

Quality of life questionnaires

To compare the quality of life and patient-reported outcomes of the salvage chemotherapy arm with those of the standard regimen

Time frame
from date of randomization through study completion, an average of 3 years
2

Perceptions of the patient-doctor relationship in patients offered bevacizumab/debulking surgery/PARPi

Measure of patient-doctor relationship: The Patient-Doctor Relationship Questionnaire measures patient perceptions of the patient-doctor relationship. Participants rate the level of helpfulness, time, trust, understanding, dedication, agreement, availability, contentment, and accessibility of their healthcare provider. All nine items are rated on a five-point Likert scale from 1 (Not at all appropriate) to 5 (totally appropriate). Mean scores are calculated, and higher scores indicate a better perceived doctor-patient relationship.

Time frame
From 4-8 weeks after a decision on bevacizumab (approx. at randomization date) through end of follow-up (2-3 years after inclusion, depending on debulking surgery)
3

Satisfaction with decision-making process in patients offered bevacizumab/debulking surgery/PARPi

Measure of satisfaction with care: One self-generated item developed on the basis of the literature will ask patients in general how they would rate the care they received for their ovarian cancer treatment during the past three months, using a five-point scale from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent). A higher score reflects a higher satisfaction with their care.

Time frame
From 4-8 weeks after a decision on bevacizumab (approx. at randomization date) through end of follow-up (2-3 years after inclusion, depending on debulking surgery)
4

Satisfaction with decision-making process in patients offered bevacizumab/debulking surgery/PARPi

Measure of decision satisfaction: The Satisfaction with Decision scale measures a patient's level of satisfaction with healthcare decisions. It consists of six statements to which respondents are asked to indicate their level of agreement using a five-point scale, from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Total scores are summed, with higher scores indicating greater decisional satisfaction.

Time frame
From 4-8 weeks after a decision on bevacizumab (approx. at randomization date) through end of follow-up (2-3 years after inclusion, depending on debulking surgery)

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

ARCAGY/ GINECO GROUP

Lead sponsor

Horizon 2020 - European Commission

Collaborator