Bicarbonate Addition to Lidocaine-Epinephrine in Surgery Under WALANT

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phasePhase 4
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

About this trial

Distal upper limb and distal lower limb surgery performed under local anesthesia using the WALANT technique (Wide Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet) has become standard practice in ambulatory orthopedic surgery. Current infiltration mixtures used by orthopedic surgeons include lidocaine-epinephrine with the addition of 8.4% bicarbonate to reduce injection-related pain and improve analgesia duration. However, the clinical benefit of bicarbonate addition remains insufficiently supported by evidence and may increase preparation complexity and risk, including potential solution crystallization.

The aim of the ROPIWA-2 trial is to investigate whether omission of bicarbonate from the local infiltration mixture is noninferior to bicarbonate addition with respect to early postoperative quality of recovery on postoperative day 1. We hypothesize that removing bicarbonate does not impair postoperative quality of recovery after ambulatory hand and foot surgery under WALANT. Expected benefits include confirmation of a simpler, ready-to-use anesthetic solution that is easier and safer to use, without reducing patient comfort or recovery. The expected risks are those normally associated with this type of procedure.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Adults (≥18 years) eligible for ambulatory surgery under WALANT for Hand surgery (including carpal tunnel release, trigger finger release, or Dupuytren's disease surgery) and foot surgery (including hallux valgus or hallux rigidus.)

Provision of free and informed consent.

Signed informed consent form.

Affiliation with or beneficiary of a health insurance system

Disqualifiers

Ischemic vascular disorders, including severe Raynaud's disease, Buerger's disease, or diabetic microangiopathy.

Scleroderma.

Known allergy to lidocaine or potential cross-reactivity with other amide-type local anesthetics.

Severe hepatic impairment.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Ambulatory surgery under Lidocaine with epinephrine alone

    Combination product

    The anesthetic solution will consist of lidocaine 5 mg/mL combined with epinephrine 0.005 mg/mL, administered as 18 mL (90 mg of lidocaine) plus 2 mL of saline (placebo), for a total volume of 20 mL Additional solution will be administered if sensory block is insufficient prior to incision.

  • Ambulatory surgery under lidocaine with epinephrine plus bicarbonate

    Combination product

    The anesthetic solution will consist of lidocaine 5 mg/mL combined with epinephrine 0.005 mg/mL, administered as 18 mL (90 mg of lidocaine) plus 2 mL of 8.4% bicarbonate, for a total volume of 20 mL. Additional solution will be administered if sensory block is insufficient prior to incision.

Treatment groups

150 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Patients undergoing hand and foot surgery with lidocaine and Epinephrine aloneExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Patients undergoing hand and foot surgery with buffered lidocaineActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

QoR-15 score, assessed at 24 hours postoperatively in both study arms

QoR-15 score, assessed at 24 hours postoperatively in both study arms. This validated questionnaire includes 15 items covering five dimensions: pain, physical comfort, physical independence, psychological support, and emotional state. Each item is rated on a 1-10 scale, with a total score ranging from 15 to 150.

Time frame
24 hours after surgery

Secondary outcomes

1

Sensory block onset time

Anesthetic block onset time: time (in minutes) from the initial injection to complete sensory block of the surgical area, defined as absence of sensation to pinprick testing performed at 5-minute intervals by the surgeon.

Time frame
Day 0
2

Intraoperative anesthetic block failure rate

Defined as the need for rescue intraoperative reinjection of local anesthetic solution by the surgeon due to persistent sensation during anesthetic block testing using nociceptive stimuli (yes/no).

Time frame
Day0
3

Pain related to injection of the WALANT anesthetic solution.

Patient self-assessment of pain experienced during WALANT administration, measured using a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).

Time frame
Day 0
4

Intraoperative pain intensity

Patient self-assessment of pain experienced during the surgical procedure, measured using a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).

Time frame
Day 0

Other outcomes

1

Sex of patients

Male/Female

Time frame
Day 0
2

Age of patients

In years

Time frame
Day 0
3

Weight of patients

In kilograms

Time frame
Day 0
4

Height of patients

In centimeters

Time frame
Day 0

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: